<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poverty, Single Mothers, and Class Mobility</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Class, Breastfeeding and Parenting Practices: Social Drivers of Childhood Development &#124; Myths of Our Time</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/comment-page-1/#comment-587651</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Class, Breastfeeding and Parenting Practices: Social Drivers of Childhood Development &#124; Myths of Our Time]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Mar 2014 17:51:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=3903#comment-587651</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[&#8230;] study should not be read as an indictment of single mothers either but should open to way towards looking at proper child welfare provisions for working parents, and [&#8230;]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] study should not be read as an indictment of single mothers either but should open to way towards looking at proper child welfare provisions for working parents, and [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poverty, Single Mothers, and Class Mobility &#171; Welcome to the Doctor&#039;s Office</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/comment-page-1/#comment-547352</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Poverty, Single Mothers, and Class Mobility &#171; Welcome to the Doctor&#039;s Office]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 22:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=3903#comment-547352</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] POVERTY, SINGLE MOTHERS, AND CLASS MOBILITY by Philip N. Cohen, [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] POVERTY, SINGLE MOTHERS, AND CLASS MOBILITY by Philip N. Cohen, [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/comment-page-1/#comment-547260</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Feb 2012 00:10:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=3903#comment-547260</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The biggest barrier to fixing the system isn&#039;t developing a new method to address poverty (experiments with guaranteed annual income schemes have already shown great promise in this respect), but the fact that those who benefit from the current system want and need a large underclass who can be kept in control through fear and desperation, as their undercompensated labour and coerced complacency drives the system. The fact that this underclass is usually a racialized one, too, just enhances the privilege experienced by the largely white owning class, and provides an easy scapegoat for pawning off the systemic problems caused by those in power. (Greedy CEOs and stockholders? Nope, must be those Mexican &quot;illegals&quot; and those &quot;shiftless&quot; black folks. . . ) The problem isn&#039;t being fixed because the most powerful interests are benefiting more than they are losing as a result of it -- it&#039;s not a &#039;problem&#039; to them.

Changing family structures will never address the root problems of a diseased system. The few &#039;malignant cells&#039; at the top of the pyramid, who consume most of the resources, starve the rest of the social body -- regardless of whether or not John and Jane have two parents or only one. The resulting inequality -- which, eventually, brings exhaustion of resources and, as a consequence, violence and revolt -- has brought down great civilizations repeatedly.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The biggest barrier to fixing the system isn&#8217;t developing a new method to address poverty (experiments with guaranteed annual income schemes have already shown great promise in this respect), but the fact that those who benefit from the current system want and need a large underclass who can be kept in control through fear and desperation, as their undercompensated labour and coerced complacency drives the system. The fact that this underclass is usually a racialized one, too, just enhances the privilege experienced by the largely white owning class, and provides an easy scapegoat for pawning off the systemic problems caused by those in power. (Greedy CEOs and stockholders? Nope, must be those Mexican &#8220;illegals&#8221; and those &#8220;shiftless&#8221; black folks. . . ) The problem isn&#8217;t being fixed because the most powerful interests are benefiting more than they are losing as a result of it &#8212; it&#8217;s not a &#8216;problem&#8217; to them.</p>
<p>Changing family structures will never address the root problems of a diseased system. The few &#8216;malignant cells&#8217; at the top of the pyramid, who consume most of the resources, starve the rest of the social body &#8212; regardless of whether or not John and Jane have two parents or only one. The resulting inequality &#8212; which, eventually, brings exhaustion of resources and, as a consequence, violence and revolt &#8212; has brought down great civilizations repeatedly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eeka</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/comment-page-1/#comment-547237</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[eeka]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:36:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=3903#comment-547237</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It would be interesting to see this broken down further. Like, are there differences in where teachers place kids if they&#039;re not aware of their backgrounds? Are there differences if their skills are evaluated using an actual assessment of reading comprehension by a psychologist or similar rather than just observation or nonstandardized testing by a teacher who might be mistaking enthusiasm or types of answers s/he prefers for skills?

I mean, there is empirical data showing that children in middle-class households hear MILLIONS more words before entering kindergarten compared to kids in poverty, which affects language development tremendously, so yes, kids in poverty have skill deficits on average, but it would be interesting to see the affects of bias as well. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be interesting to see this broken down further. Like, are there differences in where teachers place kids if they&#8217;re not aware of their backgrounds? Are there differences if their skills are evaluated using an actual assessment of reading comprehension by a psychologist or similar rather than just observation or nonstandardized testing by a teacher who might be mistaking enthusiasm or types of answers s/he prefers for skills?</p>
<p>I mean, there is empirical data showing that children in middle-class households hear MILLIONS more words before entering kindergarten compared to kids in poverty, which affects language development tremendously, so yes, kids in poverty have skill deficits on average, but it would be interesting to see the affects of bias as well. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kennethmccormack</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/02/27/poverty-single-mothers-and-class-mobility/comment-page-1/#comment-547231</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kennethmccormack]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 21:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://familyinequality.wordpress.com/?p=3903#comment-547231</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You need to show this to the current White House and get his ass in gear. But, this is what he wants.  People dependent on the Government. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You need to show this to the current White House and get his ass in gear. But, this is what he wants.  People dependent on the Government. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
