<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shareholders vs. Stakeholders</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/01/25/shareholders-vs-stakeholders/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/01/25/shareholders-vs-stakeholders/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 07:17:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Julia N123</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/01/25/shareholders-vs-stakeholders/comment-page-1/#comment-544388</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Julia N123]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Jan 2012 19:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=44496#comment-544388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[MITT ROMNEY IS GOOD-LOOKING?!!!!!

As an beautiful artistess, I must protest XXL on this.

He is as scary as his private equity-his bushy eyebrows-Maybe thats where his offshore accounts are hidden! Lets get those monsters trimmed, and maybe make some of them monster into fiscal-ethical-moral-Sensibility! I cannot understand why we see him as so business-smart when he goes into a political battle with such taxless corruption. &quot;Romney&quot;? Its Gross. And to think he is running against someone named &quot;Newt&quot; WHAT THE HELL?!!! So, Bushy-Eyebrows Vs. Toad? Salamander? Frog Species? Look at his head-he looks like a Cabbage Patch breeded with a Toad! And he has the propensity to have sex too! I am Republican, and I am voting for Mister Obama, because heaven help us if we have anyone else. (Remember: I upheld the trend of ignoring all female participants of political discussions as well due to them being non-applicable to this arena) 

This isn&#039;t 2012. Its 1920.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MITT ROMNEY IS GOOD-LOOKING?!!!!!</p>
<p>As an beautiful artistess, I must protest XXL on this.</p>
<p>He is as scary as his private equity-his bushy eyebrows-Maybe thats where his offshore accounts are hidden! Lets get those monsters trimmed, and maybe make some of them monster into fiscal-ethical-moral-Sensibility! I cannot understand why we see him as so business-smart when he goes into a political battle with such taxless corruption. &#8220;Romney&#8221;? Its Gross. And to think he is running against someone named &#8220;Newt&#8221; WHAT THE HELL?!!! So, Bushy-Eyebrows Vs. Toad? Salamander? Frog Species? Look at his head-he looks like a Cabbage Patch breeded with a Toad! And he has the propensity to have sex too! I am Republican, and I am voting for Mister Obama, because heaven help us if we have anyone else. (Remember: I upheld the trend of ignoring all female participants of political discussions as well due to them being non-applicable to this arena) </p>
<p>This isn&#8217;t 2012. Its 1920.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yrro Simyarin</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2012/01/25/shareholders-vs-stakeholders/comment-page-1/#comment-544203</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yrro Simyarin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Jan 2012 20:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=44496#comment-544203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s a fairly strong populist streak running through the Republican party as well. Even if many people admit the necessity of firms like that, no one likes the idea of shutting down a whole town&#039;s industry. Even if it *was* going to die in a year or two anyway - until it&#039;s actually killed, there&#039;s still hope.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s a fairly strong populist streak running through the Republican party as well. Even if many people admit the necessity of firms like that, no one likes the idea of shutting down a whole town&#8217;s industry. Even if it *was* going to die in a year or two anyway &#8211; until it&#8217;s actually killed, there&#8217;s still hope.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
