<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Food Production in the U.S.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 26 May 2012 00:46:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: READ A BOOK</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-394832</link>
		<dc:creator>READ A BOOK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Oct 2010 22:08:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-394832</guid>
		<description>you people are dumb.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you people are dumb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ninjas on the &#8216;Net &#124; AMNP</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-245433</link>
		<dc:creator>Ninjas on the &#8216;Net &#124; AMNP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 03:24:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-245433</guid>
		<description>[...] [image: % of US land devoted to corn (gold), wheat (green), soybeans (pink), cotton (blue), hay (yellow), and fruits/nuts/veggies (red) - via] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [image: % of US land devoted to corn (gold), wheat (green), soybeans (pink), cotton (blue), hay (yellow), and fruits/nuts/veggies (red) - via] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwenyth</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-240403</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwenyth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 22:21:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-240403</guid>
		<description>The food chain? Really?  Sigh.  Hurray for the &#039;natural order&#039; defense of your actions.  That has a lot of limitations.

Yes, we used to be a lot less sentimental about meat eating.  We used to be a lot less sensitive about a lot of things.  I&#039;m not sure I see this change as a bad thing, all told.  Do you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The food chain? Really?  Sigh.  Hurray for the &#8216;natural order&#8217; defense of your actions.  That has a lot of limitations.</p>
<p>Yes, we used to be a lot less sentimental about meat eating.  We used to be a lot less sensitive about a lot of things.  I&#8217;m not sure I see this change as a bad thing, all told.  Do you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: b</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239623</link>
		<dc:creator>b</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:42:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239623</guid>
		<description>This is only true if the reason you don&#039;t eat an animal is because it&#039;s cute, which is a really stupid reason not to eat an animal.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is only true if the reason you don&#8217;t eat an animal is because it&#8217;s cute, which is a really stupid reason not to eat an animal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: アメリカの食料生産事情グラフィックス(AGRICULTURE) : monogocoro ものごころ</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239583</link>
		<dc:creator>アメリカの食料生産事情グラフィックス(AGRICULTURE) : monogocoro ものごころ</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 04:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239583</guid>
		<description>[...] via:Contexts Blogs &#124; RADICAL CARTOGRAPHY/PROJECTS/BROWSE BY PROBLEMATIC/FOOD/ANIMAL / VEGETABLE/AGRICULTURE                 Subscribe to comments  Comment &#124; Trackback &#124;  Post Tags: Bill Rankin, インフォメーショングラフィックス, 食料 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via:Contexts Blogs | RADICAL CARTOGRAPHY/PROJECTS/BROWSE BY PROBLEMATIC/FOOD/ANIMAL / VEGETABLE/AGRICULTURE                 Subscribe to comments  Comment | Trackback |  Post Tags: Bill Rankin, インフォメーショングラフィックス, 食料 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239459</link>
		<dc:creator>Village Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 00:54:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239459</guid>
		<description>Somebody &quot;pulls the old canard?&quot; That sounds sordid. But anyway, I&#039;ve killed and eaten some adorably cute creatures that probably nurtured their young with almost human-like affection, but that&#039;s how it goes. I didn&#039;t &quot;feel bad&quot; about killing and eating them no matter how cute they were as it&#039;s a part of being human, and right up until the moment I removed their head (chickens) or snapped their neck (rabbits) I treated them very well, and I made sure that their demise was instant. That said, industrial meat production is a medieval travesty that needs to be rectified but it&#039;s really a separate issue from meat consumption as a dietary choice. 

I realize that thanks to our modern industrial farming and transportation infrastructure we can live as vegetarians outside the tropics without starving to death, but really without our upright posture, language, and ability to eat meat we&#039;d still just be a bunch of apes flinging poop at each other in the jungle. I think (but sometimes I wonder) that I prefer humans being able to fling poop at each other from anywhere on the planet via abstract symbols transmitted electronically, but I frankly don&#039;t have too much faith in our ability to maintain the techno-marvels we&#039;ve created and now take for granted for too much longer; maybe 20-25 more years tops and then it&#039;ll time for Plan B.

If our modern transportation infrastructure or our GMO monocultures fail (among myriad other possibilities), we will instantly -meaning within a year- be back to a situation where we won&#039;t be able to live in about 3/4 of North America unless we consume animal protein. That means being a healthy vegetarian living far away from the tropics is a luxury that has only been made possible by industrialization, and there&#039;s no reason to think our modern industrial civilization isn&#039;t as temporary a condition as all other human endeavors throughout history have proven to be, so being an omnivore affords a great deal more flexibility should things not go according to plan. That all probably seems like a strange and obtuse rationale for eating meat, but it&#039;s &lt;b&gt;all&lt;/b&gt; connected more intricately than most people can possibly imagine. You&#039;ll see...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Somebody &#8220;pulls the old canard?&#8221; That sounds sordid. But anyway, I&#8217;ve killed and eaten some adorably cute creatures that probably nurtured their young with almost human-like affection, but that&#8217;s how it goes. I didn&#8217;t &#8220;feel bad&#8221; about killing and eating them no matter how cute they were as it&#8217;s a part of being human, and right up until the moment I removed their head (chickens) or snapped their neck (rabbits) I treated them very well, and I made sure that their demise was instant. That said, industrial meat production is a medieval travesty that needs to be rectified but it&#8217;s really a separate issue from meat consumption as a dietary choice. </p>
<p>I realize that thanks to our modern industrial farming and transportation infrastructure we can live as vegetarians outside the tropics without starving to death, but really without our upright posture, language, and ability to eat meat we&#8217;d still just be a bunch of apes flinging poop at each other in the jungle. I think (but sometimes I wonder) that I prefer humans being able to fling poop at each other from anywhere on the planet via abstract symbols transmitted electronically, but I frankly don&#8217;t have too much faith in our ability to maintain the techno-marvels we&#8217;ve created and now take for granted for too much longer; maybe 20-25 more years tops and then it&#8217;ll time for Plan B.</p>
<p>If our modern transportation infrastructure or our GMO monocultures fail (among myriad other possibilities), we will instantly -meaning within a year- be back to a situation where we won&#8217;t be able to live in about 3/4 of North America unless we consume animal protein. That means being a healthy vegetarian living far away from the tropics is a luxury that has only been made possible by industrialization, and there&#8217;s no reason to think our modern industrial civilization isn&#8217;t as temporary a condition as all other human endeavors throughout history have proven to be, so being an omnivore affords a great deal more flexibility should things not go according to plan. That all probably seems like a strange and obtuse rationale for eating meat, but it&#8217;s <b>all</b> connected more intricately than most people can possibly imagine. You&#8217;ll see&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory A. Butler</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239321</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory A. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 22:24:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239321</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m saying we need to be a lot less sentimental about the use of animals for meat - if you don&#039;t want to eat meat that&#039;s your business, but don&#039;t try and guilt trip those of us who do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m saying we need to be a lot less sentimental about the use of animals for meat &#8211; if you don&#8217;t want to eat meat that&#8217;s your business, but don&#8217;t try and guilt trip those of us who do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Live United Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hunger in Contexts: Recommended Reading</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239139</link>
		<dc:creator>Live United Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Hunger in Contexts: Recommended Reading</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:15:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239139</guid>
		<description>[...] etc.—that viewers/readers submit. (You know, I wouldn’t have thought that you could even get 2,800 pigs in a square [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] etc.—that viewers/readers submit. (You know, I wouldn’t have thought that you could even get 2,800 pigs in a square [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeff Kaufman</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239085</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeff Kaufman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239085</guid>
		<description>I think three categories is about the limit of what we can pull apart: three primaries, each with an intensity.  These maps have a good bit more, and telling red apart from orange+pink is pretty hard for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think three categories is about the limit of what we can pull apart: three primaries, each with an intensity.  These maps have a good bit more, and telling red apart from orange+pink is pretty hard for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Terry &#187; Archive &#187; Food production in the US</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239061</link>
		<dc:creator>Terry &#187; Archive &#187; Food production in the US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:49:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239061</guid>
		<description>[...] class, I thought I&#8217;d share with you the following graph of food production in the US (care of Sociological Images; click through for larger [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] class, I thought I&#8217;d share with you the following graph of food production in the US (care of Sociological Images; click through for larger [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239041</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239041</guid>
		<description>I had the same thought. It&#039;s more useful to show general trends, not information about a specific county, really.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had the same thought. It&#8217;s more useful to show general trends, not information about a specific county, really.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-239040</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:18:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-239040</guid>
		<description>Most sheep and goats &quot;naturally&quot; give birth to multiple lambs--I say &quot;naturally&quot; because I&#039;m sure it has a lot to do with selective breeding over time, and I don&#039;t know if undomesticated sheep/goat species have the same high rates of twins and triplets. But there definitely wasn&#039;t any effort to implant eggs or anything--that would be WAY too expensive to be cost effective. And the vast majority are able to care for 2 or 3 just fine. But every once in a while a ewe either can&#039;t produce enough milk or just rejects one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most sheep and goats &#8220;naturally&#8221; give birth to multiple lambs&#8211;I say &#8220;naturally&#8221; because I&#8217;m sure it has a lot to do with selective breeding over time, and I don&#8217;t know if undomesticated sheep/goat species have the same high rates of twins and triplets. But there definitely wasn&#8217;t any effort to implant eggs or anything&#8211;that would be WAY too expensive to be cost effective. And the vast majority are able to care for 2 or 3 just fine. But every once in a while a ewe either can&#8217;t produce enough milk or just rejects one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louche</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-238970</link>
		<dc:creator>Louche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:22:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-238970</guid>
		<description>Did they have that many lambs on their own, or were they forced to? Just wondering.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did they have that many lambs on their own, or were they forced to? Just wondering.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Louche</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-238964</link>
		<dc:creator>Louche</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 16:17:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-238964</guid>
		<description>Are you *really* trying to reduce people&#039;s diet to &quot;it&#039;s called the food chain&quot;? Do you really think life is that simple?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you *really* trying to reduce people&#8217;s diet to &#8220;it&#8217;s called the food chain&#8221;? Do you really think life is that simple?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gregory A. Butler</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2010/03/10/food-production-in-the-u-s/comment-page-1/#comment-238818</link>
		<dc:creator>Gregory A. Butler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 13:45:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=21479#comment-238818</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s called &quot;the food chain&quot; - we&#039;re on top; cows, pigs, chickens, turkeys, lambs and goats are below us, so let&#039;s be realistic. Put it this way - do you see lions out there picketing for gazelles rights?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s called &#8220;the food chain&#8221; &#8211; we&#8217;re on top; cows, pigs, chickens, turkeys, lambs and goats are below us, so let&#8217;s be realistic. Put it this way &#8211; do you see lions out there picketing for gazelles rights?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

