<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Weekends Are for Porn (Not News)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 19:25:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: weekends are for porn &#124; jamYe waXman. seX matters.</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-177537</link>
		<dc:creator>weekends are for porn &#124; jamYe waXman. seX matters.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Dec 2009 21:26:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-177537</guid>
		<description>[...] A little light reading (in the form of charts and maps) for this laid back holiday weekend. In case you didn&#8217;t know what to do this Saturday or Sunday, it&#8217;s good to know that loads of &#8220;other&#8221; people are downloading porn! See, it says so right here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] A little light reading (in the form of charts and maps) for this laid back holiday weekend. In case you didn&#8217;t know what to do this Saturday or Sunday, it&#8217;s good to know that loads of &#8220;other&#8221; people are downloading porn! See, it says so right here. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary Tracy9</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-166845</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary Tracy9</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Dec 2009 21:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-166845</guid>
		<description>Nice to see no one has questioned the very existence of porn itself. 

Well, I do. Porn shouldn&#039;t exist. Full stop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice to see no one has questioned the very existence of porn itself. </p>
<p>Well, I do. Porn shouldn&#8217;t exist. Full stop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lsmsrbls</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-165889</link>
		<dc:creator>lsmsrbls</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Dec 2009 12:24:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-165889</guid>
		<description>Especially when you consider who would google &quot;porn&quot; itself.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Especially when you consider who would google &#8220;porn&#8221; itself.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Il porno nel week end &#171; Loriscosta&#8217;s Weblog</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-165378</link>
		<dc:creator>Il porno nel week end &#171; Loriscosta&#8217;s Weblog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 17:24:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-165378</guid>
		<description>[...] (via Rocketboom ma ce l&#8217;hanno tutti Gleuch, SocialImmages&#8230;) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (via Rocketboom ma ce l&#8217;hanno tutti Gleuch, SocialImmages&#8230;) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: it's a love thing</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-165138</link>
		<dc:creator>it's a love thing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 07:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-165138</guid>
		<description>A christmas time post about porn on google trends and no mention of the yearly christmas porn spike?

see it for your self: http://www.google.ca/trends?q=porn</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A christmas time post about porn on google trends and no mention of the yearly christmas porn spike?</p>
<p>see it for your self: <a href="http://www.google.ca/trends?q=porn" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.ca/trends?q=porn</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164998</link>
		<dc:creator>E</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Dec 2009 02:39:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164998</guid>
		<description>Ha!  I love that musical!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ha!  I love that musical!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164518</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 11:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164518</guid>
		<description>Well done. Similar results when you look at any specific type of porn or sex act (I won&#039;t mention which ones I inserted) - well-defined weekend peaks.

Of course, in light of the recession, here&#039;s another interesting correlation - http://www.google.com/trends?q=porn%2C+jobs&amp;ctab=0&amp;geo=us&amp;geor=all&amp;date=mtd&amp;sort=0</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done. Similar results when you look at any specific type of porn or sex act (I won&#8217;t mention which ones I inserted) &#8211; well-defined weekend peaks.</p>
<p>Of course, in light of the recession, here&#8217;s another interesting correlation &#8211; <a href="http://www.google.com/trends?q=porn%2C+jobs&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=us&#038;geor=all&#038;date=mtd&#038;sort=0" rel="nofollow">http://www.google.com/trends?q=porn%2C+jobs&#038;ctab=0&#038;geo=us&#038;geor=all&#038;date=mtd&#038;sort=0</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164514</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 10:56:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164514</guid>
		<description>&quot;I wonder if it seems weirder to people to look at porn on a Tuesday night than a Friday night, even if Tuesday and Wednesday are your days off...&quot;

From one guy&#039;s perspective - a definite no. Any time you have the privacy and spare time to watch porn is a time to watch porn. More than anything, this graph shows us when the aggregate volume of spare solo time peaks. 

What the graph doesn&#039;t isolate is how extraordinarily popular &quot;porn&quot; is compared to all but two other search terms (Facebook, Youtube), at any time of day or week. That should neatly account for all the variations in schedules and home lives that you mention. But if you have any info showing that MORE people are now working or studying on Saturday than on any given weekday, then you might be on to something.

As for the weekend &quot;kids around&quot; factor, I&#039;d expect it to be cancelled out by the fact that an enormous number of the people looking for porn ARE kids.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I wonder if it seems weirder to people to look at porn on a Tuesday night than a Friday night, even if Tuesday and Wednesday are your days off&#8230;&#8221;</p>
<p>From one guy&#8217;s perspective &#8211; a definite no. Any time you have the privacy and spare time to watch porn is a time to watch porn. More than anything, this graph shows us when the aggregate volume of spare solo time peaks. </p>
<p>What the graph doesn&#8217;t isolate is how extraordinarily popular &#8220;porn&#8221; is compared to all but two other search terms (Facebook, Youtube), at any time of day or week. That should neatly account for all the variations in schedules and home lives that you mention. But if you have any info showing that MORE people are now working or studying on Saturday than on any given weekday, then you might be on to something.</p>
<p>As for the weekend &#8220;kids around&#8221; factor, I&#8217;d expect it to be cancelled out by the fact that an enormous number of the people looking for porn ARE kids.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kate</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164474</link>
		<dc:creator>Kate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 09:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164474</guid>
		<description>But this is just for searches.  Who searches for &#039;news&#039;?  Wouldn&#039;t you search for a channel or some other content provider?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this is just for searches.  Who searches for &#8216;news&#8217;?  Wouldn&#8217;t you search for a channel or some other content provider?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: splack</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164277</link>
		<dc:creator>splack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 04:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164277</guid>
		<description>Eh, sometimes. 

http://www.switched.com/2009/09/30/national-science-foundation-hit-by-internet-porn-scandal/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eh, sometimes. </p>
<p><a href="http://www.switched.com/2009/09/30/national-science-foundation-hit-by-internet-porn-scandal/" rel="nofollow">http://www.switched.com/2009/09/30/national-science-foundation-hit-by-internet-porn-scandal/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lu</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164233</link>
		<dc:creator>Lu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 02:34:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164233</guid>
		<description>Seriously, who just Googles &quot;porn&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, who just Googles &#8220;porn&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gwen</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164191</link>
		<dc:creator>Gwen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:42:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164191</guid>
		<description>Sure, but lots of people do have to work on weekends, and for those with kids, even if they&#039;re off on weekends, they&#039;re more likely to have kids around too, which you&#039;d think might somewhat counteract the &quot;weekend freedom&quot; effect. Maybe? 

I wonder if it seems weirder to people to look at porn on a Tuesday night than a Friday night, even if Tuesday and Wednesday are your days off and therefore count as your weekend?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sure, but lots of people do have to work on weekends, and for those with kids, even if they&#8217;re off on weekends, they&#8217;re more likely to have kids around too, which you&#8217;d think might somewhat counteract the &#8220;weekend freedom&#8221; effect. Maybe? </p>
<p>I wonder if it seems weirder to people to look at porn on a Tuesday night than a Friday night, even if Tuesday and Wednesday are your days off and therefore count as your weekend?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164189</link>
		<dc:creator>J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:36:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164189</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;I’d expect that people view less porn when they’re at work or school.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

People take NSFW seriously, I&#039;d assume.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>I’d expect that people view less porn when they’re at work or school.</p></blockquote>
<p>People take NSFW seriously, I&#8217;d assume.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164184</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:21:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164184</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d expect that people view less porn when they&#039;re at work or school.

Zooming out a bit, the search volume of porn has really taken off in the last 2 years: http://trends.google.com/trends?q=porn&amp;date=all&amp;geo=usa&amp;ctab=0&amp;sort=0&amp;sa=N

Not to extrapolate too much, but the big bump in &quot;porn&quot; searches in spring &#039;08 - after which they never dipped below their prior peak - neatly coincides with the time the employment rate began an identical trend: http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&amp;graph_name=LN_cpsbref3

Maybe we have one more way to measure the economy on our...er...hands.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d expect that people view less porn when they&#8217;re at work or school.</p>
<p>Zooming out a bit, the search volume of porn has really taken off in the last 2 years: <a href="http://trends.google.com/trends?q=porn&#038;date=all&#038;geo=usa&#038;ctab=0&#038;sort=0&#038;sa=N" rel="nofollow">http://trends.google.com/trends?q=porn&#038;date=all&#038;geo=usa&#038;ctab=0&#038;sort=0&#038;sa=N</a></p>
<p>Not to extrapolate too much, but the big bump in &#8220;porn&#8221; searches in spring &#8217;08 &#8211; after which they never dipped below their prior peak &#8211; neatly coincides with the time the employment rate began an identical trend: <a href="http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&#038;graph_name=LN_cpsbref3" rel="nofollow">http://data.bls.gov/PDQ/servlet/SurveyOutputServlet?request_action=wh&#038;graph_name=LN_cpsbref3</a></p>
<p>Maybe we have one more way to measure the economy on our&#8230;er&#8230;hands.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kevin</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/12/09/weekends-are-for-porn/comment-page-1/#comment-164180</link>
		<dc:creator>Kevin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 01:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=17789#comment-164180</guid>
		<description>Hahaha, that&#039;s exactly what I was thinking.

But I guess it&#039;s not quite as bad as when people google using entire sentences...

&quot;Alright google, let&#039;s see here...a man and a woman having sexual intercourse doggy style on a couch *enter* YES!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hahaha, that&#8217;s exactly what I was thinking.</p>
<p>But I guess it&#8217;s not quite as bad as when people google using entire sentences&#8230;</p>
<p>&#8220;Alright google, let&#8217;s see here&#8230;a man and a woman having sexual intercourse doggy style on a couch *enter* YES!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

