<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Changing Fashion Standards: Sexy Shoes from 1969</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Damenschuhe</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-164399</link>
		<dc:creator>Damenschuhe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 07:41:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-164399</guid>
		<description>Having comfortable shoe can really take ladies everywhere without hurting their feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having comfortable shoe can really take ladies everywhere without hurting their feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sophia Williams</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-141055</link>
		<dc:creator>Sophia Williams</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 02:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-141055</guid>
		<description>Your article is wonderful! Hold it. And my favourite high heel shoes is christian louboutinshoes , they are very nice and sexy !! Recommend www.christianlouboutingirl.us online store !  Thanks !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your article is wonderful! Hold it. And my favourite high heel shoes is christian louboutinshoes , they are very nice and sexy !! Recommend <a href="http://www.christianlouboutingirl.us" rel="nofollow">http://www.christianlouboutingirl.us</a> online store !  Thanks !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129859</link>
		<dc:creator>christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129859</guid>
		<description>I had a pair of platform sneakers too!  They were the first pair of shoe I ever bought on my own!  I thought I looked just like Posh Spice! ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a pair of platform sneakers too!  They were the first pair of shoe I ever bought on my own!  I thought I looked just like Posh Spice! ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129856</link>
		<dc:creator>christina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129856</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s funny! I have the exact opposite problem.  All shoes are far too wide. I have been searching for a pair of boots that will actually stay up on my calf for 3 years!And I&#039;m no skinny-minnie!  I feel like they are making shoes too wide nowadays.  Interesting how our perspectives regarding shoes are the exact opposite.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s funny! I have the exact opposite problem.  All shoes are far too wide. I have been searching for a pair of boots that will actually stay up on my calf for 3 years!And I&#8217;m no skinny-minnie!  I feel like they are making shoes too wide nowadays.  Interesting how our perspectives regarding shoes are the exact opposite.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giorgos</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129805</link>
		<dc:creator>giorgos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129805</guid>
		<description>Wow. Well spotted. I don&#039;t know what &quot;Whittier Grand Opening&quot; means, but this image certainly says something about the fetishisation of women&#039;s shoes by men to the point that the shoes themselves become sexual objects. It is important, also, to note that women&#039;s shoes carrying the label &quot;sexy&quot; are primarily the ones that are uncomfortable, cause pain and injuries to women. In other words, it is the sexualisation of women&#039;s pain that drives men&#039;s shoe fetishism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow. Well spotted. I don&#8217;t know what &#8220;Whittier Grand Opening&#8221; means, but this image certainly says something about the fetishisation of women&#8217;s shoes by men to the point that the shoes themselves become sexual objects. It is important, also, to note that women&#8217;s shoes carrying the label &#8220;sexy&#8221; are primarily the ones that are uncomfortable, cause pain and injuries to women. In other words, it is the sexualisation of women&#8217;s pain that drives men&#8217;s shoe fetishism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeToo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129667</link>
		<dc:creator>MeToo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 05:48:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129667</guid>
		<description>I think it is, in part. As in, our shoes can even make women like this sexy.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it is, in part. As in, our shoes can even make women like this sexy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Crab</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129549</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Crab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:13:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129549</guid>
		<description>Captain Crab, not &quot;grab&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Captain Crab, not &#8220;grab&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Captain Grab</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129548</link>
		<dc:creator>Captain Grab</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:09:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129548</guid>
		<description>Wait a few years and they will be &quot;sexy&quot; again.  Maybe soon if designers read this blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a few years and they will be &#8220;sexy&#8221; again.  Maybe soon if designers read this blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: meerkat</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129480</link>
		<dc:creator>meerkat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:44:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129480</guid>
		<description>They are still too sexily impractical for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They are still too sexily impractical for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129472</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:36:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129472</guid>
		<description>I had a pair of those weird platform sneakers in the mid-90s. They died from using them so much. When they come back in style, I am SO buying a pair.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I had a pair of those weird platform sneakers in the mid-90s. They died from using them so much. When they come back in style, I am SO buying a pair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelle</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129453</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:59:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129453</guid>
		<description>“Our ideas of what constitutes a “sexy” woman’s shoe today includes a higher, thinner heel, meaning they’re also in general less stable, harder to walk in, and worse for your feet than shoes with a chunky heel like these.”

It goes in cycles...high-fashion shoes in the 1950s were stiletto-heeled, pointy-toed, and such. The mid-60s were flats or kitten heels, late 60s-mid 70s as in the picture with and without platforms, late 70s to late 80s was stiletto heels again, late 80s to mid 90s was mostly chunkier shoes as above, mid 90s were just weird with things like platform sneakers or futuristic casual loafers, and now we&#039;re back to tottery stilettos, with or without platforms. Fashion will tire of those soon enough and chunkier heels will be back right about when we get 90s retro fashion. :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“Our ideas of what constitutes a “sexy” woman’s shoe today includes a higher, thinner heel, meaning they’re also in general less stable, harder to walk in, and worse for your feet than shoes with a chunky heel like these.”</p>
<p>It goes in cycles&#8230;high-fashion shoes in the 1950s were stiletto-heeled, pointy-toed, and such. The mid-60s were flats or kitten heels, late 60s-mid 70s as in the picture with and without platforms, late 70s to late 80s was stiletto heels again, late 80s to mid 90s was mostly chunkier shoes as above, mid 90s were just weird with things like platform sneakers or futuristic casual loafers, and now we&#8217;re back to tottery stilettos, with or without platforms. Fashion will tire of those soon enough and chunkier heels will be back right about when we get 90s retro fashion. :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129329</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:01:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129329</guid>
		<description>Note to self: Figure out a way to travel back in time to 1969 to buy shoes. 

Those shoes are cute, and it&#039;s really hard to find shoes with wide chunky heels now that don&#039;t look frumpy...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Note to self: Figure out a way to travel back in time to 1969 to buy shoes. </p>
<p>Those shoes are cute, and it&#8217;s really hard to find shoes with wide chunky heels now that don&#8217;t look frumpy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: chryslin</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129321</link>
		<dc:creator>chryslin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:46:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129321</guid>
		<description>What&#039;s with the guy fellating the shoe in the &quot;Whittier Grand Opening&quot; box?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What&#8217;s with the guy fellating the shoe in the &#8220;Whittier Grand Opening&#8221; box?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129298</link>
		<dc:creator>Mina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:09:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129298</guid>
		<description>&quot;Our ideas of what constitutes a “sexy” woman’s shoe today includes a higher, thinner heel, meaning they’re also in general less stable, harder to walk in, and worse for your feet than shoes with a chunky heel like these.&quot;

Don&#039;t forget narrow. I spent several hours trying on shoes the other weekend just to end up with a pair of Mary Jane ballet flats. All the other shoes were far too narrow for my feet. Women&#039;s shoes simply aren&#039;t designed for women with wide feet.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Our ideas of what constitutes a “sexy” woman’s shoe today includes a higher, thinner heel, meaning they’re also in general less stable, harder to walk in, and worse for your feet than shoes with a chunky heel like these.&#8221;</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t forget narrow. I spent several hours trying on shoes the other weekend just to end up with a pair of Mary Jane ballet flats. All the other shoes were far too narrow for my feet. Women&#8217;s shoes simply aren&#8217;t designed for women with wide feet.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/10/19/changing-fashion-standards-sexy-shoes-from-1969/comment-page-1/#comment-129265</link>
		<dc:creator>Deaf Indian Muslim Anarchist</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:12:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=14494#comment-129265</guid>
		<description>I actually thought the comic was a mockery of sex appeal, because of how the female was drawn. Yikes</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I actually thought the comic was a mockery of sex appeal, because of how the female was drawn. Yikes</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

