<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: U.S. Requests to Remove Books from Libraries, 2007-2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 17:40:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: MaLu</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-121157</link>
		<dc:creator>MaLu</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 04 Oct 2009 08:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-121157</guid>
		<description>&quot;L&#039;homme qui rit&quot;,&quot;Germinal&quot;, pour ne citer que deux oeuvres, dispensent aux enfants un savoir humain. un savoir qui n&#039;est pas &quot;vendable&quot;, un savoir-être humain. S&#039;émouvoir, se révolter, s&#039;émerveiller. 

Quelle société veut-on ?

Cormac Mac Carthy a écrit le roman le plus bouleversant de ces 20 dernières années, sur le lien entre le petit enfant et son parent déclinant, sur la peur viscérale de l&#039;apocalypse, c&#039;est &quot;La Route&quot;. Quelle tristesse, s&#039;il n&#039;est accessible qu&#039;à un petit nombre...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;L&#8217;homme qui rit&#8221;,&#8221;Germinal&#8221;, pour ne citer que deux oeuvres, dispensent aux enfants un savoir humain. un savoir qui n&#8217;est pas &#8220;vendable&#8221;, un savoir-être humain. S&#8217;émouvoir, se révolter, s&#8217;émerveiller. </p>
<p>Quelle société veut-on ?</p>
<p>Cormac Mac Carthy a écrit le roman le plus bouleversant de ces 20 dernières années, sur le lien entre le petit enfant et son parent déclinant, sur la peur viscérale de l&#8217;apocalypse, c&#8217;est &#8220;La Route&#8221;. Quelle tristesse, s&#8217;il n&#8217;est accessible qu&#8217;à un petit nombre&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-120571</link>
		<dc:creator>Village Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:47:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-120571</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;Pretty soon most kids will have wireless devices and then what little censorship we have will vanish. Isn’t book banning just in the class of behaviors that will die out over a long enough time frame?&lt;/i&gt;

I think that happened five years ago (at least). So really, book banning is already merely a ceremonial re-enactment of an old, time-dishonored ritual to celebrate a simpler and more willfully ignorant age.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>Pretty soon most kids will have wireless devices and then what little censorship we have will vanish. Isn’t book banning just in the class of behaviors that will die out over a long enough time frame?</i></p>
<p>I think that happened five years ago (at least). So really, book banning is already merely a ceremonial re-enactment of an old, time-dishonored ritual to celebrate a simpler and more willfully ignorant age.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beelzebub</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-120552</link>
		<dc:creator>Beelzebub</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Oct 2009 02:02:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-120552</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s an unfortunate myth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s an unfortunate myth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rodney</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-119355</link>
		<dc:creator>Rodney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 20:31:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-119355</guid>
		<description>I loved this one, though, from Maine: &quot;(2008) Robie Harris&#039; It&#039;s Perfectly Normal: A Book about Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex, and Sexual Health was removed by a patron because of her objections to the book&#039;s sexual content. Other patrons donated 4 copies of the book, which remain in circulation today.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved this one, though, from Maine: &#8220;(2008) Robie Harris&#8217; It&#8217;s Perfectly Normal: A Book about Changing Bodies, Growing Up, Sex, and Sexual Health was removed by a patron because of her objections to the book&#8217;s sexual content. Other patrons donated 4 copies of the book, which remain in circulation today.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-119177</link>
		<dc:creator>Village Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 13:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-119177</guid>
		<description>I also encountered books that disturbed me and that I was obviously reading too young (what are kids who read at a college level in 6th grade supposed to do?) but like you I also set them aside when they made me feel too uncomfortable. 

Still, I think there&#039;s a major difference between being disturbed and being truly damaged. And IMO the damage a book can cause (if any) is still going to be insignificant if compared to the ubiquitous constant onslaught of visual media using graphic imagery that leaves nothing to the imagination. At least &lt;i&gt;you&lt;/i&gt; had to create the image of electrodes being attached to the character in the sf book you mentioned; on TV or in movies that image would&#039;ve instantly appeared fully formed in your mind since it would&#039;ve been depicted that way on the screen. 

Besides, I don&#039;t think most censorship advocates give a damn about kids&#039; minds anyway. I think they&#039;re either just trying to strong-arm their belief system into other people&#039;s heads or they&#039;re desperately trying to maintain a doomed status quo and the actual kids are incidental. 

Words that open minds are always the most threatening to the established order, but since totalitarianism is a parody of itself the book banners ironically save us the trouble of figuring out which books to read by putting them on the handy &#039;ban&#039; list for us. It&#039;s like the &quot;Parental Advisory: Explicit Lyrics&quot; labels on music; when that first came out I would seek out albums that had it over those that didn&#039;t (I was kind of young at the time, and the stickers just screamed &quot;forbidden fruit!&quot; as they tend to to kids).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I also encountered books that disturbed me and that I was obviously reading too young (what are kids who read at a college level in 6th grade supposed to do?) but like you I also set them aside when they made me feel too uncomfortable. </p>
<p>Still, I think there&#8217;s a major difference between being disturbed and being truly damaged. And IMO the damage a book can cause (if any) is still going to be insignificant if compared to the ubiquitous constant onslaught of visual media using graphic imagery that leaves nothing to the imagination. At least <i>you</i> had to create the image of electrodes being attached to the character in the sf book you mentioned; on TV or in movies that image would&#8217;ve instantly appeared fully formed in your mind since it would&#8217;ve been depicted that way on the screen. </p>
<p>Besides, I don&#8217;t think most censorship advocates give a damn about kids&#8217; minds anyway. I think they&#8217;re either just trying to strong-arm their belief system into other people&#8217;s heads or they&#8217;re desperately trying to maintain a doomed status quo and the actual kids are incidental. </p>
<p>Words that open minds are always the most threatening to the established order, but since totalitarianism is a parody of itself the book banners ironically save us the trouble of figuring out which books to read by putting them on the handy &#8216;ban&#8217; list for us. It&#8217;s like the &#8220;Parental Advisory: Explicit Lyrics&#8221; labels on music; when that first came out I would seek out albums that had it over those that didn&#8217;t (I was kind of young at the time, and the stickers just screamed &#8220;forbidden fruit!&#8221; as they tend to to kids).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bagelsan</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118958</link>
		<dc:creator>Bagelsan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 02:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118958</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;What possible harm could a few written words cause any more? If by around the age of 13 or so a kid has seen an uncensored example of every conceivable type of sexual act (and some that are still inconceivable even after having seen them) and has watched countless instances of graphic and often real violence then I’d say a book that merely describes such things is hardly an issue.&lt;/i&gt;

I gotta disagree with this, though. As a kid I didn&#039;t have cable and we never rented violent movies so I was very sheltered from a lot of sex/violence/whatnot going on. What I did have was the public library, and the adult sci-fi section. Which apparently likes to throw in some graphic underage torture/rape scenes -- those bothered me more than anything I&#039;d ever seen before. One of the only books I&#039;ve ever had to put down finally got me to quit when the kid started getting electrodes attached to him to make him more responsive... So yeah. To answer you and Andrew, I found some of that stuff pretty damaging as a kid. :p

Not that books like *that* are what get banned of course (and I don&#039;t think they should be anyways) but books really can have more of an impact than &quot;just a few written words&quot; yanno?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>What possible harm could a few written words cause any more? If by around the age of 13 or so a kid has seen an uncensored example of every conceivable type of sexual act (and some that are still inconceivable even after having seen them) and has watched countless instances of graphic and often real violence then I’d say a book that merely describes such things is hardly an issue.</i></p>
<p>I gotta disagree with this, though. As a kid I didn&#8217;t have cable and we never rented violent movies so I was very sheltered from a lot of sex/violence/whatnot going on. What I did have was the public library, and the adult sci-fi section. Which apparently likes to throw in some graphic underage torture/rape scenes &#8212; those bothered me more than anything I&#8217;d ever seen before. One of the only books I&#8217;ve ever had to put down finally got me to quit when the kid started getting electrodes attached to him to make him more responsive&#8230; So yeah. To answer you and Andrew, I found some of that stuff pretty damaging as a kid. :p</p>
<p>Not that books like *that* are what get banned of course (and I don&#8217;t think they should be anyways) but books really can have more of an impact than &#8220;just a few written words&#8221; yanno?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Taro Holmes</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118911</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Taro Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:20:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118911</guid>
		<description>Pretty soon most kids will have wireless devices and then what little censorship we have will vanish. Isn&#039;t book banning just in the class of behaviors that will die out over a long enough time frame?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pretty soon most kids will have wireless devices and then what little censorship we have will vanish. Isn&#8217;t book banning just in the class of behaviors that will die out over a long enough time frame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marc Taro Holmes</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118908</link>
		<dc:creator>Marc Taro Holmes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:18:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118908</guid>
		<description>Does reading pornography too young count? My parents were pretty liberal, so there was plenty of hardcore around my house from the earliest time I could read. I don&#039;t feel &#039;damaged&#039; by it - but I&#039;m definitely different than other ppl in my attitude to content.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does reading pornography too young count? My parents were pretty liberal, so there was plenty of hardcore around my house from the earliest time I could read. I don&#8217;t feel &#8216;damaged&#8217; by it &#8211; but I&#8217;m definitely different than other ppl in my attitude to content.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jennifer</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118807</link>
		<dc:creator>jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 20:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118807</guid>
		<description>@duran - in order to receive federal funding for internet access (i&#039;m sorry that i can&#039;t recall the exact name of the program) public libraries must filter their internet access.  generally, an adult can get an employee of the library to override the restrictions if they can show that they are over 17 or 18, but that is not the case in all public libraries.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@duran &#8211; in order to receive federal funding for internet access (i&#8217;m sorry that i can&#8217;t recall the exact name of the program) public libraries must filter their internet access.  generally, an adult can get an employee of the library to override the restrictions if they can show that they are over 17 or 18, but that is not the case in all public libraries.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jill</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118717</link>
		<dc:creator>Jill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118717</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve never readi it myself, but Bless Me Ultima was on the REQUIRED reading list for reshmen when my younger brothers went to Catholic high school</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never readi it myself, but Bless Me Ultima was on the REQUIRED reading list for reshmen when my younger brothers went to Catholic high school</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Woz</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118701</link>
		<dc:creator>Woz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 14:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118701</guid>
		<description>When I was in high school about a decade ago, a friend&#039;s father leafed through his copy of &quot;I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings&quot; and became so enraged at the depictions of sexuality (or was it sexual abuse? I must admit I never actually read the book) that he demannded the school no longer teach the book.

And based on this *one* person&#039;s complaint, it was expunged from the curriculum. Now that&#039;s small-town Iowa for you...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I was in high school about a decade ago, a friend&#8217;s father leafed through his copy of &#8220;I Know Why The Caged Bird Sings&#8221; and became so enraged at the depictions of sexuality (or was it sexual abuse? I must admit I never actually read the book) that he demannded the school no longer teach the book.</p>
<p>And based on this *one* person&#8217;s complaint, it was expunged from the curriculum. Now that&#8217;s small-town Iowa for you&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118667</link>
		<dc:creator>Village Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:26:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118667</guid>
		<description>Oh, and I guess from the graphic we can conclude that all the offensive books have already been purged from Utah, Arkansas, and South Dakota libraries. And it&#039;s apparently a non-issue in Nevada, as I would expect.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and I guess from the graphic we can conclude that all the offensive books have already been purged from Utah, Arkansas, and South Dakota libraries. And it&#8217;s apparently a non-issue in Nevada, as I would expect.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Lamond</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118661</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Lamond</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 13:01:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118661</guid>
		<description>Banning books usually just serves to increase their popularity. It is sad though that they will be out of reach from those who might have needed them most.
On the other hand, there are two instances where I have supported a little censorship. The first is in St. Catharines where one of the families of Bernardo&#039;s victims lives, the local bookstores were not allowed to put a book written on the subject and published before the videos appeared in their front windows.
The second is just a case in which a book was inappropriately shelved with children&#039;s books and was moved to the adult section. In both cases the books were still available, but were moved in an attempt to be sensitive to patrons.

Going to the sheriff and teacher suspension? Sounds like something Orwell would have written. But there is a lot of censorship that goes on at the purchasing level. Just try and find a library video/dvd about natural birth in Southern Ontario!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Banning books usually just serves to increase their popularity. It is sad though that they will be out of reach from those who might have needed them most.<br />
On the other hand, there are two instances where I have supported a little censorship. The first is in St. Catharines where one of the families of Bernardo&#8217;s victims lives, the local bookstores were not allowed to put a book written on the subject and published before the videos appeared in their front windows.<br />
The second is just a case in which a book was inappropriately shelved with children&#8217;s books and was moved to the adult section. In both cases the books were still available, but were moved in an attempt to be sensitive to patrons.</p>
<p>Going to the sheriff and teacher suspension? Sounds like something Orwell would have written. But there is a lot of censorship that goes on at the purchasing level. Just try and find a library video/dvd about natural birth in Southern Ontario!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Village Idiot</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118656</link>
		<dc:creator>Village Idiot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:39:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118656</guid>
		<description>What possible harm could a few written words cause any more? If by around the age of 13 or so a kid has seen an uncensored example of every conceivable type of sexual act (and some that are still inconceivable even after having seen them) and has watched countless instances of graphic and often &lt;i&gt;real&lt;/i&gt; violence then I&#039;d say a book that merely describes such things is hardly an issue. 

Most parents with a child who is 12 or older are delusional if they think their child hasn&#039;t already seen it all. The kids will deny it (so will the parents) just like they&#039;re supposed to so everyone can continue walking around pulling the wool over their own eyes about how fanatically degenerate the world has become. 

Maybe a better approach would be to teach kids how to think critically about what they encounter rather than running ahead of them trying to throw black sheets over anything wicked, like nipples (Ashcroft took the lead on that one) or two men or two women holding hands, or criticisms of the Catholic Church?!? (huh? seriously? Since when is being &quot;Anti-Catholic&quot; a bad thing?).

Teaching kids how to deal with the world they actually live in instead of encapsulating them in the cramped, suffocating box of some hysterical Concerned Parent&#039;s fear-based reality might just help them cope with this increasingly insane society. Don&#039;t worry about Junior reading a library book about real or fictional characters having sex (even if it&#039;s gay sex); Junior has most likely already seen plenty of double-fisted necro-bestial bukkake so I think Junior&#039;s parents and teachers should be thrilled that Junior went into a library at all for something other than internet access. So it&#039;s, like, whatever.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What possible harm could a few written words cause any more? If by around the age of 13 or so a kid has seen an uncensored example of every conceivable type of sexual act (and some that are still inconceivable even after having seen them) and has watched countless instances of graphic and often <i>real</i> violence then I&#8217;d say a book that merely describes such things is hardly an issue. </p>
<p>Most parents with a child who is 12 or older are delusional if they think their child hasn&#8217;t already seen it all. The kids will deny it (so will the parents) just like they&#8217;re supposed to so everyone can continue walking around pulling the wool over their own eyes about how fanatically degenerate the world has become. </p>
<p>Maybe a better approach would be to teach kids how to think critically about what they encounter rather than running ahead of them trying to throw black sheets over anything wicked, like nipples (Ashcroft took the lead on that one) or two men or two women holding hands, or criticisms of the Catholic Church?!? (huh? seriously? Since when is being &#8220;Anti-Catholic&#8221; a bad thing?).</p>
<p>Teaching kids how to deal with the world they actually live in instead of encapsulating them in the cramped, suffocating box of some hysterical Concerned Parent&#8217;s fear-based reality might just help them cope with this increasingly insane society. Don&#8217;t worry about Junior reading a library book about real or fictional characters having sex (even if it&#8217;s gay sex); Junior has most likely already seen plenty of double-fisted necro-bestial bukkake so I think Junior&#8217;s parents and teachers should be thrilled that Junior went into a library at all for something other than internet access. So it&#8217;s, like, whatever.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/09/28/u-s-requests-to-remove-books-from-libraries-2007-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-118653</link>
		<dc:creator>Andrew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Sep 2009 12:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=13610#comment-118653</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s also been a few *cough* years since I was in school, but back then, the kids who took advantage of the school library for non-assigned reading were a pretty small minority. 

I&#039;ll never forget the Banned Books Week poster in the library; in a time in which everything else in my world was censored, transparently commercial, or dumbed-down, the list on that poster was my lifeline.  Like any adolescent, I wanted to know everything that &quot;the man&quot; seemed to say I shouldn&#039;t, and my access to all those books too controversial for the classroom gave me the push to be the most well-read kid in class.

No 8th grade teacher would dream of assigning a book like &quot;Another Country,&quot; or even &quot;The Color Purple,&quot; but as a 14-year-old queer black kid, those books meant a lot more to me than anything served up in the classroom. When teachers were pleased my term papers, it wasn&#039;t because anyone had bothered to teach me how to write, but rather because I&#039;d learned to love modern prose from reading the age-inappropriate books that appealed to my curiosities. Imagine teaching &quot;Lolita&quot; or &quot;Portnoy&#039;s Complaint&quot; to precocious youngsters - who tend to love both - and it seems like a very bad idea...but then imagine modern lit without them, and it seems even worse. And while the literary value of those works is undisputed, there&#039;s still an enormous lost opportunity in graphic novels, by and large absent from schools, but well-loved by the brainy kids who find them. 

Most kids, unfortunately, won&#039;t take any kind of refuge in books, often because the most exhilarating, sexy, and fiery ones have been subtly withheld from them. With those on-campus libraries, schools have the chance to nudge kids toward the literary equivalent of all the hyper-sexual and violent media they&#039;re bound to consume anyway, and maybe they&#039;ll have a better chance of joining that small number of kids who graduate high school at adult reading level.

But anyone is welcome to convince me otherwise...just tell me how you were damaged for life by reading a grown-up book too young!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s also been a few *cough* years since I was in school, but back then, the kids who took advantage of the school library for non-assigned reading were a pretty small minority. </p>
<p>I&#8217;ll never forget the Banned Books Week poster in the library; in a time in which everything else in my world was censored, transparently commercial, or dumbed-down, the list on that poster was my lifeline.  Like any adolescent, I wanted to know everything that &#8220;the man&#8221; seemed to say I shouldn&#8217;t, and my access to all those books too controversial for the classroom gave me the push to be the most well-read kid in class.</p>
<p>No 8th grade teacher would dream of assigning a book like &#8220;Another Country,&#8221; or even &#8220;The Color Purple,&#8221; but as a 14-year-old queer black kid, those books meant a lot more to me than anything served up in the classroom. When teachers were pleased my term papers, it wasn&#8217;t because anyone had bothered to teach me how to write, but rather because I&#8217;d learned to love modern prose from reading the age-inappropriate books that appealed to my curiosities. Imagine teaching &#8220;Lolita&#8221; or &#8220;Portnoy&#8217;s Complaint&#8221; to precocious youngsters &#8211; who tend to love both &#8211; and it seems like a very bad idea&#8230;but then imagine modern lit without them, and it seems even worse. And while the literary value of those works is undisputed, there&#8217;s still an enormous lost opportunity in graphic novels, by and large absent from schools, but well-loved by the brainy kids who find them. </p>
<p>Most kids, unfortunately, won&#8217;t take any kind of refuge in books, often because the most exhilarating, sexy, and fiery ones have been subtly withheld from them. With those on-campus libraries, schools have the chance to nudge kids toward the literary equivalent of all the hyper-sexual and violent media they&#8217;re bound to consume anyway, and maybe they&#8217;ll have a better chance of joining that small number of kids who graduate high school at adult reading level.</p>
<p>But anyone is welcome to convince me otherwise&#8230;just tell me how you were damaged for life by reading a grown-up book too young!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

