The ONLY reason naked BW are not considered obscene is they are not considered “human.” The same way a female animal is not seen as “human,” and the same way black women and black men stood on a slave auction block stark naked:

because they were seen as less than human, non-people, who did not deserve the rights, freedom, or dignity that white people take for granted.

For anyone to try to rationalize this even YOU admitted white females were NOT shown in this manner, considering the era that National Geographic was a mainstay in every doctor’s and dentist’s office — is more evidence of how white people play the nut role when other whites are practicing racism against non-whites to DECEIVE non-whites (like myself) that we are being mistreated.

However, those of us who understand how white supremacy is practiced, are not so easily fooled.

Well, Europeans may not be the majority in the world, but we are still minorities in their mind. In a way, I understand it. They are used to their own physical forms of beauty and it is hard to transcend that notion(Even Indian, Hispanic and Asian girls are becoming the more “Desired minorities” now because Europeans are discovering that they have physical qualities which are somewhat like theirs.) When you break it down, there are even Europeans who have trouble coexisting with other Europeans. As far as physical beautiy is concerned, i’ve heard of some non-Italaian Europeans who think that Italian women look like men/have moustaches, which always makes me laugh. Italian chicks are beautiful. Political wise, some Irish still hate the English/vise versa because of centuries old feuds between the two which didn’t really end until the 80s.

Their is still a problem with Chechens and the more European Russians, and the Gypsies still find it hard as well in Europe, etc etc.

With that sort of inter-racial(I don’t believe that Europeans are the same…They are descended from different tribes. Dacians are not Gauls, Picts are not Saxons, etc etc. Some are related…But some are obviously physically different. Just like Fulani is not synonymous with Kenyan, Eritreans are different from Nigerians.) tension it’s no surprise that minorities find it hard to find equality amongst Europeans. Many Europeans don’t even get along with one another. This Pan-European outlook in the American media is not supported by history.

Did any of this make sense O_o?

Remember, “Might makes right”…If you have the power, and the majority of power in the world is held by Caucasians, then you can decide that, for example, Africans are “Exotic” and “Weirdly alien”…And of course, having an appearance which, at most extremes, and at it’s darkest and most Subsaharan is completely the opposite of what Europeans are use to, I can see how, even in an innocent way they just might exoticize something they are not use to.

What is most interesting about your comment — and I agree with some of it — is this (bizarre) notion that the first AND oldest people on the planet, who were AFRICANS, are “exotic” and “weirdly alien”

while the youngest and smallest racial group (politically speaking), who are Europeans, are somehow considered the “norm” when they are less than 10% of the world’s population

Of course, the images reflect the inherent racism/white supremacy MINDSET that has infected the planet, just as it has infected and distorted any dialogue about race, like one in which seemingly intelligent people describe other human beings — just because they look different — as “exotic.”

I see your point. The white girl is not even nude and even has little implieds. It is a little disturbing.

The images are beautiful, though…Both models look stunning. Not quite sure what to do with it.

Black women are chosen as models for fashion editorial/print b/c of a combination of their curvy physique, exotic beauty, and sex appeal. It’s a fact of life. That’s how black models get jobs(With the exception of the weirdly alien African models).

The other model(White) has the “alienish” model. White models go from beautiful, alien, ethereal…But its hard for black models transcend the mainly nonAfrican(Fashion) world as anything other than being model worthy in a primitive sense(African-centered Fashion photog) or in an “Urban honey” way , even in the world of Haute Couture fashion, photography, etc etc, as we here see.

Strange Thing #2:
From a fashion-mag POV, this is confusing. These garments have nothing to do with each other. You’d think they’d be related in some way, but there’s no apparent theme (except partial nudity). And I’m REALLY good at finding patterns. I even looked to see if maybe the two women were wearing one outfit between them in each photo or something like that (y’know, because “best friends” share clothes— get it?), but no dice. Even if you ignore the random nudity (pretty standard, sigh) and the oddness of only-the-black-model-is-naked, and the ridiculous slack-jawed Magnum face (or is it Blue Steel?) the blonde is giving us, it just… makes no sense.

Strange Thing #3:
What’s up with their hair? How comez the white model’s hair is the same in every single photo (ie: huge, out, and being blown back)? I thought it might be a tad different in the second-to-last shot, but nope— it’s just being held down by the cord of her domino. Meanwhile, the black model’s hair/head is styled differently in each shot. Eh?

and anyone who does not see the “superior” position of the white model VS the “inferior” position of the black model is either blind or….

Anyone remember the National Geographic magazine?

with black women and bare breasts

at a time when nudity of any kind for HUMAN BEINGS was forbidden?

but – since black women — black people — are animals (less than human)

showing a black woman’s breasts was no more serious

than showing a cow’s UDDERS.

This so-called fashion photo shoot

is the same d**n thing

in my humble opinion…

once we learn what white supremacy looks like

we will recognize it EVERYWHERE

If we (black people) do not learn how to recognize

and oppose it

we will continue to be VICTIMIZED