<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Black &#8220;Lil&#8217; Monkey&#8221; Baby Doll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Attitudes About Race &#124; Erin V Echols</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-547221</link>
		<dc:creator>Attitudes About Race &#124; Erin V Echols</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Feb 2012 20:08:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-547221</guid>
		<description>[...] of various racial/ethnic groups in movies,sports, politics, comedy, toys, advertisements, costumes [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of various racial/ethnic groups in movies,sports, politics, comedy, toys, advertisements, costumes [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob reyes</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-543405</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob reyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-543405</guid>
		<description>wow cool so cool what u wrote
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow cool so cool what u wrote</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob reyes</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-543404</link>
		<dc:creator>Jacob reyes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jan 2012 17:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-543404</guid>
		<description>All gay this website is totally gay</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All gay this website is totally gay</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pleading &#187; Blog Archive &#187; african american babies pictures</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-514584</link>
		<dc:creator>Pleading &#187; Blog Archive &#187; african american babies pictures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Jun 2011 12:21:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-514584</guid>
		<description>[...] Black вЂњLil&#039; MonkeyвЂќ Baby Doll В» Sociological Images Aug 16, 2009 &#8230; Come on Sharon, who said an African American parent does not let their children play with monkey &#8230; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Black вЂњLil&#039; MonkeyвЂќ Baby Doll В» Sociological Images Aug 16, 2009 &#8230; Come on Sharon, who said an African American parent does not let their children play with monkey &#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Black “Lil&#039; Monkey” Baby Doll » Sociological Images &#124; Baby Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-356095</link>
		<dc:creator>Black “Lil&#039; Monkey” Baby Doll » Sociological Images &#124; Baby Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Aug 2010 20:03:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-356095</guid>
		<description>[...] more: Black “Lil&#039; Monkey” Baby Doll » Sociological Images  Posted in My, The, Uncategorized, With, You, an, and, at, babies, baby, children, i, in, la, young [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] more: Black “Lil&#039; Monkey” Baby Doll » Sociological Images  Posted in My, The, Uncategorized, With, You, an, and, at, babies, baby, children, i, in, la, young [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Handful Of&#8230; Companies That Could Go Back To The Drawing Board &#171; monkeyBLOGmonkeyDO &#8211; Peeling Away @ Pop Culture</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-278905</link>
		<dc:creator>A Handful Of&#8230; Companies That Could Go Back To The Drawing Board &#171; monkeyBLOGmonkeyDO &#8211; Peeling Away @ Pop Culture</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Apr 2010 02:47:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-278905</guid>
		<description>[...] Eloquence is not my strong suit, so check out Sociological Images&#8217; take on this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Eloquence is not my strong suit, so check out Sociological Images&#8217; take on this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Walmart Barbie Scandal &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-239104</link>
		<dc:creator>The Walmart Barbie Scandal &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 18:32:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-239104</guid>
		<description>[...] faced this kind of problem when it&#8217;s black Lil&#8217; Monkey doll was pulled from shelves.  It turned out that the Lil&#8217; Monkey doll came in three different races, but the black doll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] faced this kind of problem when it&#8217;s black Lil&#8217; Monkey doll was pulled from shelves.  It turned out that the Lil&#8217; Monkey doll came in three different races, but the black doll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Compton Cookout: Racism, Resistance, and Backlash &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-230272</link>
		<dc:creator>The Compton Cookout: Racism, Resistance, and Backlash &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 04:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-230272</guid>
		<description>[...] and inequality.  We&#8217;ve posted about it in response to racist products (Mr. Wasabi, the Black &#8220;Lil&#8217; Monkey&#8221; doll, and the Obama sock monkey) as well as anti-rape campaigns.  As I wrote in a previous post: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and inequality.  We&#8217;ve posted about it in response to racist products (Mr. Wasabi, the Black &#8220;Lil&#8217; Monkey&#8221; doll, and the Obama sock monkey) as well as anti-rape campaigns.  As I wrote in a previous post: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Polygenism: the link to primates &#171; Kew Chronicles</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-136972</link>
		<dc:creator>Polygenism: the link to primates &#171; Kew Chronicles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 15:08:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-136972</guid>
		<description>[...] very good example of this comes in the form an article I came across recently.  The retailer of the Dolls in that article has since taken necessarily [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] very good example of this comes in the form an article I came across recently.  The retailer of the Dolls in that article has since taken necessarily [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: &#8216;Lil Monkey&#8217; doll causes controversy &#171; Media Diversity</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-121954</link>
		<dc:creator>&#8216;Lil Monkey&#8217; doll causes controversy &#171; Media Diversity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2009 20:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-121954</guid>
		<description>[...] blog that featured the story stresses the sociological issues and the questions surrounding the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] blog that featured the story stresses the sociological issues and the questions surrounding the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Carrie Hughes</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-113802</link>
		<dc:creator>Carrie Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Sep 2009 01:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-113802</guid>
		<description>Well I just want to know where this doll is sold. My daughter is bi-racial and we gave her the nickname &quot;Monkey&quot; and I want to buy her one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I just want to know where this doll is sold. My daughter is bi-racial and we gave her the nickname &#8220;Monkey&#8221; and I want to buy her one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deborah Green</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-112936</link>
		<dc:creator>Deborah Green</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:52:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-112936</guid>
		<description>Bottom line, whites have referred to blacks as apes, monkeys, etc. for ages.  No I do not like the doll being referred to as lil monkey and of all the names they could have given the doll especially with the background  of blacks being referred to as monkeys, you people amaze me with your out of touch ramblings of why blacks should not be offended by this.  You are out of touch, blind, stupid or plain ignorant to what is going on here, and I don&#039;t intend to waste my time and energy trying to make you people see why this doll is offensive.  Get real and get a clue.  Do not contact me, I don&#039;t care to listen to what you have to say.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bottom line, whites have referred to blacks as apes, monkeys, etc. for ages.  No I do not like the doll being referred to as lil monkey and of all the names they could have given the doll especially with the background  of blacks being referred to as monkeys, you people amaze me with your out of touch ramblings of why blacks should not be offended by this.  You are out of touch, blind, stupid or plain ignorant to what is going on here, and I don&#8217;t intend to waste my time and energy trying to make you people see why this doll is offensive.  Get real and get a clue.  Do not contact me, I don&#8217;t care to listen to what you have to say.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: careycarey</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-112924</link>
		<dc:creator>careycarey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 21:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-112924</guid>
		<description>Sharon  ....&quot;No one did, the question was entirely rhetorical to illustrate the point that we do not imbue racial meaning into every aspect of our lives&quot;

  It may have been written as a rhetorical question, but it still sidestepped the issue.  
 
Here&#039;s another example of how you&#039;re wandering off:  &quot;To use your analogy, if an african american child was playing with a monkey doll and someone watching was asked what was on their mind, I doubt they would be comparing the looks of the doll and the child nor would their mind wander to the history of the usage of the word monkey&quot;

Actually, you&#039;ve made my point. In your analogy, you failed to add &quot;a doll with the words &quot;lil monkey&quot; on it&#039;s head&quot;. Following that theme, your explaination of the word &quot;cracker&quot; still fails to attach the word to the subject. Did you wish to address the issue of &quot;YOU&quot; being offended? Lets come back. Again, if &quot;YOU&quot; were offended by another, would it be right for me or anyone to speak for you? You insist on blaming the media. Someone obviously brought this to their attention. You appear to be projecting the problem away from the source. Regardless of the &quot;intent&quot;, the FACT remains that the displaying of such dolls offends some cultures - period. This seems to be a cut and dry issue. You error, when you try to tell someone else what should and shouldn&#039;t bother themWhat is it that you are not understanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sharon  &#8230;.&#8221;No one did, the question was entirely rhetorical to illustrate the point that we do not imbue racial meaning into every aspect of our lives&#8221;</p>
<p>  It may have been written as a rhetorical question, but it still sidestepped the issue.  </p>
<p>Here&#8217;s another example of how you&#8217;re wandering off:  &#8220;To use your analogy, if an african american child was playing with a monkey doll and someone watching was asked what was on their mind, I doubt they would be comparing the looks of the doll and the child nor would their mind wander to the history of the usage of the word monkey&#8221;</p>
<p>Actually, you&#8217;ve made my point. In your analogy, you failed to add &#8220;a doll with the words &#8220;lil monkey&#8221; on it&#8217;s head&#8221;. Following that theme, your explaination of the word &#8220;cracker&#8221; still fails to attach the word to the subject. Did you wish to address the issue of &#8220;YOU&#8221; being offended? Lets come back. Again, if &#8220;YOU&#8221; were offended by another, would it be right for me or anyone to speak for you? You insist on blaming the media. Someone obviously brought this to their attention. You appear to be projecting the problem away from the source. Regardless of the &#8220;intent&#8221;, the FACT remains that the displaying of such dolls offends some cultures &#8211; period. This seems to be a cut and dry issue. You error, when you try to tell someone else what should and shouldn&#8217;t bother themWhat is it that you are not understanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chrystal</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-112905</link>
		<dc:creator>Chrystal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:52:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-112905</guid>
		<description>What I think is sad, Deborah, is that people find this to be offensive at all. I think this shows exactly why racism is still so present today, regardless of how much we try to hide it - because people constantly have to worry about upsetting someone with something as silly as this. How on Earth can this possibly be viewed as a racial slur?? The dolls were put out in 3 different ethnicities, each available in either outfit. You really think a toy company would go through THAT much marketing/production/materials just to get a sly racial jab in?? What a sad world those of you who believe that live in. Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m not turning a blind eye to the presence of prejudism nor am I pretending it doesn&#039;t exist; I&#039;m just saying being SO overly cautious of it and bending over SO far backwards to be sure no one could possibly be offended in any stretch of the imagination is a bit overboard. Any product that is ever created could be twisted into some form of racism, and honestly it&#039;s ridiculous.

Furthermore, I disagree with some of your other thoughts as well. I do agree wholeheartedly with teaching your children to be proud of who they are and where they come from, but &quot;..most importantly, teach them that in life they will always come across people who have the mindset of those who produced and named this doll..&quot;, no. How about teaching our children not to automatically assume the worst in people? How about teaching them that yes, in some circumstances, people will have different views of different ethnicities and teach them not to fall prey to that type of judgemental thinking, but also teach them not to be offended by every little tiny detail of life? I think that is the more valuable lesson. Another thing I disagree on is your statement about focusing on the fact that we have a black president. Believe me, I am insanely proud of America for finally looking past a person&#039;s skin color and instead choosing them based on their leadership skills and what they can do for our country. But are we really going to focus on the fact that he&#039;s black for the entire 4, if not 8, years of his presidency? To me, that just means we&#039;re still focusing on color rather than who he actually is.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I think is sad, Deborah, is that people find this to be offensive at all. I think this shows exactly why racism is still so present today, regardless of how much we try to hide it &#8211; because people constantly have to worry about upsetting someone with something as silly as this. How on Earth can this possibly be viewed as a racial slur?? The dolls were put out in 3 different ethnicities, each available in either outfit. You really think a toy company would go through THAT much marketing/production/materials just to get a sly racial jab in?? What a sad world those of you who believe that live in. Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m not turning a blind eye to the presence of prejudism nor am I pretending it doesn&#8217;t exist; I&#8217;m just saying being SO overly cautious of it and bending over SO far backwards to be sure no one could possibly be offended in any stretch of the imagination is a bit overboard. Any product that is ever created could be twisted into some form of racism, and honestly it&#8217;s ridiculous.</p>
<p>Furthermore, I disagree with some of your other thoughts as well. I do agree wholeheartedly with teaching your children to be proud of who they are and where they come from, but &#8220;..most importantly, teach them that in life they will always come across people who have the mindset of those who produced and named this doll..&#8221;, no. How about teaching our children not to automatically assume the worst in people? How about teaching them that yes, in some circumstances, people will have different views of different ethnicities and teach them not to fall prey to that type of judgemental thinking, but also teach them not to be offended by every little tiny detail of life? I think that is the more valuable lesson. Another thing I disagree on is your statement about focusing on the fact that we have a black president. Believe me, I am insanely proud of America for finally looking past a person&#8217;s skin color and instead choosing them based on their leadership skills and what they can do for our country. But are we really going to focus on the fact that he&#8217;s black for the entire 4, if not 8, years of his presidency? To me, that just means we&#8217;re still focusing on color rather than who he actually is.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sharon</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/08/16/black-lil-monkey-baby-doll/comment-page-2/#comment-112885</link>
		<dc:creator>Sharon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 20:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=12228#comment-112885</guid>
		<description>Oh, and the use of the term cracker was rather inspired by a comment on Jill&#039;s post that seems to either have been since deleted or was sent to her personally. It used cracker prolifically in such a way that it seemed to be a valid competitor to the term monkey. So if &quot;cracker&quot; seems random and not on the same level, keep in mind that the post was meant to follow a more obvious usage of the word.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, and the use of the term cracker was rather inspired by a comment on Jill&#8217;s post that seems to either have been since deleted or was sent to her personally. It used cracker prolifically in such a way that it seemed to be a valid competitor to the term monkey. So if &#8220;cracker&#8221; seems random and not on the same level, keep in mind that the post was meant to follow a more obvious usage of the word.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

