Did you even bother to read my latest post? I re-read it just now, and it only BRIEFLY mentions age as one item in a list at the very end, and the post ITSELF has absolutely NOTHING to do with age. So, if that’s what you read into it, then you are obviously the one obsessed with age.

I advocate people’s freedom to seek whatever they want within the law, which is more than can be said for you. Whether someone wants to date/marry someone their age, older or younger, and their reasons why, are THEIR OWN BUSINESS and NONE OF YOURS.

It appears though that women do not have to follow this law. Hey Ann, what is a “cougar?” Why do you say “You go girl” everytime you see an old woman with a much younger man? No hypocrisy there! When you are an old angry bitter divorced woman, let us see how many dates you turn down just because the hot guy is way younger than yourself. And you WILL be old before you know it!

Another reason why foreign women are so superior to American women and why international marriages have a success rate in the high 90 per cent range as opposed to the 50 per cent failure (divorce) rate domestic marriages have.

Even if I was 20 years old, I would never marry an immature, childish, self centered American woman. They don’t know what they want until they are at least 25 and then after that they change their minds every 6 months.They figure if the marriage doesn’t work out they will just divorce the guy in 6 months and soak him for every cent they can.

Foreign women are so much more mature emotionally. Even at the age of 18, they know exactly what they want in a man. Oh yes, they associate age with wisdom and stability, not to mention much hotter sex!

What’s ironic about this whole thing is that real pornography, sex hookup and sham dating sites, like “prison penpals” and others, where women pose nude and ask for money, are under little or no attack.

It is the serious “personals ad” services (the term I like to use), where people seeking a life partner to build a family with, that are the subject of public scrutiny and dissent.

I call them personals ad services because that’s what they are. They are no different than your local newspaper or magazine personals where people post and answer messages. The same information gets exchanged, the same type of meetings occur (except that foreign families are far more strict about dating protocol, so those women are actually SAFER than the local girls who meet through the Washington Post personals), and probably the same percentage of people eventually get married.

People who paint these services as “mail order bride” services are under the mistaken impression that only women advertise and hence are treated as “product”. However, if they looked further they would find that similar pages of men’s listings are sent to ladies. Are we also being “sold” to them as “product”? Where are we never referred to as “mail order grooms”?

These services comprise people freely posting and answering messages in what others have called a “free-will meeting place”. It is people CHOOSING whom to contact and befriend; just like on Facebook, Friendster, MySpace, Match.com, Cupid’s Destiny, the Sheela Wood column and a host of other similar services from the present and past. In fact, people in this country have been meeting marriage partners through personals advertising since the early 19th century. Only in the last three decades have these types of meetings been painted as exploitative, abusive, “trafficking”, “modern-day slavery”, “bride purchasing” and “servitude”; and the people referred to by the pejorative “mail order brides” and “consumer-husbands”. All of this slander and defamatory hyperbole started right around the time the radical wing of the feminist movement got off the ground in the late 1960′s; which, incidentally, is about the time “Women’s and Gender Studies” curricula started being taught in colleges and universities. Interesting…..

When you get right down to it, free adults in a free society have the right to seek their own companionship however and wherever they find it. If two people choose to gamble on the motives of someone from a far away land, a very different culture and economy, or a much older or younger companion, it is BETWEEN THE TWO OF THEM. It is NONE of anybody else’s business. If someone does abuse someone, it’s up to law enforcement and the criminal justice system to deal individually with these people. It’s not the government’s role to be “Dr. Phil” and determine a safe family arrangement for every person.

Individual liberty and personal responsibility go hand in hand. These are the values the Founding Fathers had in mind when they wrote the Constitution. Are we going to hold fast to these ideals, or abandon them for a nanny police state?

Freedom, if you are a man, to place your information with an International Friendship Service or Penpal Club (NOT the Layli Miller-Muro fabricated label of International Marriage Broker Service of which NONE exist.)

Freedom, if you are a foreign woman, to do the same. (NOT “mail order bride” another feminist propaganda label.)

There is a certain segment (probably 1 per cent) of “old fashioned” American men who are attracted to foreign women for various reasons, including physical looks, culture, traditional values, religious values, desire to raise a family, etc. These men are honest, hard working and appreciate an honest, mutual loving relationship based on mutual love and respect for each other. They are policemen, firemen, lawyers, doctors, actors, musicians, salesmen, truck drivers, clergymen, investors, etc. etc., you name it. They come from all walks of life, but they are GOOD honest men. They are decent men. They deserve that special someone on their lives. So what if that someone is from a different country? So what if that someone is from a different nationality? Who has the right to say they can’t seek that special someone in their life?

There is a certain segment (probably 1 per cent) of “old fashioned” foreign women who are attracted to foreign men for various reasons, including physical looks, culture, traditional values, religious values, desire to raise a family, etc. These women are honest, hard working and appreciate an honest, mutual loving relationship based on mutual love and respect for each other. They are secretaries, nurses, salesladies, lawyers, business owners, teachers, college students, professors, etc. etc., you name it. They come from all walks of life, but they are GOOD honest women. They are decent women. They deserve that special someone on their lives. So what if that someone is from a different country (the USA.) So what if that someone is from a different nationality? Who has the right to say they can’t seek that special someone in their life?

Folks, these are really decent, honest, law-abiding, God-fearing NICE people. DECENT men and women who just want the chance to be able to say hi to each other and take it from there. They are not stupid. They are not dumb. They will not just jump into the first thing that comes their way. They will test the waters. They will correspond with several people or whatever until they find what they feel could potentially be someone they feel compatible with. They correspond with emails and letters, exchange photos, reveal their innermost thoughts and feelings to the other person. Time passes until there comes a point where the man will take the voyage of a lifetime to meet that special someone he has been opening his heart to for the past year or so (or?)

The best part is when they finally meet in person, it will just be the “frosting on the cake” because they already know each other deep inside at that point in time. These marriages have a success rate in the high 90 per cent range and it is easy to see why.

But how do they “meet” in the first place? The normal term is services called International Friendship Services, Penpal Clubs (for single adults instead of school children), perhaps International Dating Services (although in my humble opinion “dating” means meeting for a date, going to dinner and then a movie or concert or something fun that both the lady and man finds enjoyable. Hard to do that when you are thousands of miles away.)

So how do they meet then?

First of all, the lady has usually heard of the PenPal Club (MY preferred term) through word of mouth from a happily married girlfriend, sister, cousin or business card (one service has over 1 million floating out there that the ladies photocopy and distribute to friends – sorry Layli).

Then the lady sends in her photo (conservative, of course, NO nudity, NO bikinis, face shots or full length photos in a conservative ankle or knee length dress.) The Penpal Service suggests a face shot because if you truly love someone and marry them, you had better love her face because hopefully you will be looking at it for the rest of your life.

Then the men. Same for them. A conservative photo, a lot of guys wear suits and get professional photos taken or maybe a shot of them in a favorite activity – tennis, golf, fishing, whatever. They are VERY serious about this.

Then the biodatas. Pretty much the same for both the men and women. Interests, hobbies, religious beliefs and practices, type of music they enjoy, what they like to read, what kind of movies they like, what kind of partner in life they hope to find. Typical, yet such very important stuff really.

Then the LADIES go over the men’s information and decide FOR THEMSELVES if any men interest them and who THEY will choose to respond to. In the cases where the men contact the ladies first, it is still THE LADIES who decide whom THEY wish to respond back to. Remember that. It is THE LADIES who do the choosing and picking!

Reiterate! THE LADIES ARE THE ONES WHO DO THE PICKING AND CHOOSING. And take my word for it, they are smart enough to know what they are doing and especially, the type of man they are looking for.

Then you have people like IRANIAN-american Layli Miller-Muro who knows NOTHING about these services (while claiming to be an “expert”), or the men who use these services and certainly not the ladies who use these services, let alone knowing how their relationships grow or what happens after they are married. She knows NOTHING NOTHING NOTHING and cannot come up with one bonifide and verified shred of evidence to prove that she does besides fabricated “facts and stats” out of her huge IRANIAN ass! Hey, when the couples are corresponding and growing their relationship, they don’t tell the Penpal Service about it, so how in the Hell would Layli know? After the couples have married and have kids, the only way the Penpal Service knows is when the happy couple sends them a photo and thank you letter, so how in the Hell would Layli know? These couples have no idea who in the Hell Layli Miller-Muro is, so how in the Hell does Layli Miller-Miller know what is going on and why does she LIE to make it sound like the husbands are (1) beating the crap out of their wives, (2) “premeditating torturing” them (Layli’s own words), (3) “serial abusing them” (Layli’s words), or (are you ready for this?) (4) “selling their wives to brothels!” Puuuleeeez! Give me a break! She must deal with some pretty stupid people to think she can get away with this crap!

Can you believe the media and politicians actually fall for this garbage? And she gets $1.5 million of our hard-earned tax dollars a year (and growing) to promote this BS?

Shame on her! Shame on Wash, DC for feeding her hate! Shame on the media for falling for it! Shame on the politicians for, wait, we already know they have no shame and certainly neither does she!

I tried to argue with him on the “Living in Peru” message thread that NOW is a good organization that has fought tirelessly to advance equal rights and equal opportunities and protection for women, but he and others showed me that a part of what I was arguing is in error.

As someone who cares about the CONSTITUTION and a FREE AMERICA, I reconsidered some of what these people were saying, and see things differently now.

I argued that “Paying a fee for the right to post a message is not the same as paying a fee to obtain a list of people who are presented to get married”; not realizing, of course, that I was in error thinking that a such service that actually “arranges marriages” exists in the 21st century.

I argued that “A free will meeting people site is not the same as a marriage broker, no matter how you spin it.”, but was brainwashed by the modern feminist cartel that women are having their marriages arranged and have no choice in whom they end up with.

I made the point that Match.com and other dating sites are not marriage brokers, because … “The marriage broker was the guy…he used a message board..he could have also taken out a classified ad, distributed posters around town or just showed up….”, but again was under the false impression that someone kidnaps girls, ties them up with ropes and keeps them padlocked in a holding room until their “order” is filled by someone who purchases them through a catalog. What was I thinking?

Since “I am shocked and ashamed of any American that does not hold the foundation of our democracy as sacred”, as I argued then, I have seen the light and believe that any service that introduces single people; whether they fit the “profile” of a “marriage broker” or not, should be protected by the constitutional rights of free speech and free assembly.

You, your activist groups or the Government are not their nannies. These are mature adult women, I don’t see why they need government regulated babysitters.

I have seen the light. Thanks Frank, Delphi, Triston and others. You guys are patriots.