<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What Warrants A Slide Show?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 16:59:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: (Lack of) Global News Coverage in the U.S. &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-210996</link>
		<dc:creator>(Lack of) Global News Coverage in the U.S. &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 15:18:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-210996</guid>
		<description>[...] which missing kids get news coverage?, covering Obama and McCain, covering Obama and Clinton, and what&#8217;s worth covering in a slideshow?        Leave a Comment     Tags: celebrity, discourse/language, globalization, media, nation: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] which missing kids get news coverage?, covering Obama and McCain, covering Obama and Clinton, and what&#8217;s worth covering in a slideshow?        Leave a Comment     Tags: celebrity, discourse/language, globalization, media, nation: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chelle</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-207609</link>
		<dc:creator>Chelle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 21:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-207609</guid>
		<description>The cafe where they use sex to sell drinks, as someone has mentioned, is nothing new. This stuff has been in Japan a long time before this showed up in maid cafés, where waitresses (there were no waiters) dress up in French maid costumes and are extremely submissive to the customers (99% men). They&#039;re just westernizing the cafes to fit American culture (the Japanese, and also now as a trend in Hong Kong, have some French maid fetishes).

And the thing is, the French maids in those cafes are in fishnets, dresses that obviously emphasize their bust (hence bumping up their cup sizes by 2 letters), and just know how to bend to your liking. Of course, the cafe owners said this was nothing immoral, and many otaku guys (Japanophiles) love going there to &quot;unwind&quot; or &quot;relax&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The cafe where they use sex to sell drinks, as someone has mentioned, is nothing new. This stuff has been in Japan a long time before this showed up in maid cafés, where waitresses (there were no waiters) dress up in French maid costumes and are extremely submissive to the customers (99% men). They&#8217;re just westernizing the cafes to fit American culture (the Japanese, and also now as a trend in Hong Kong, have some French maid fetishes).</p>
<p>And the thing is, the French maids in those cafes are in fishnets, dresses that obviously emphasize their bust (hence bumping up their cup sizes by 2 letters), and just know how to bend to your liking. Of course, the cafe owners said this was nothing immoral, and many otaku guys (Japanophiles) love going there to &#8220;unwind&#8221; or &#8220;relax&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anna</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-207536</link>
		<dc:creator>Anna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 19:21:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-207536</guid>
		<description>I was excited by the idea of 185 pictures of cheerleaders.  When I thought they were going to be real (ie. competitive, both men &amp; women) cheerleaders -- gymnastics, aerials, and so forth.  Imagine my disappointment!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was excited by the idea of 185 pictures of cheerleaders.  When I thought they were going to be real (ie. competitive, both men &amp; women) cheerleaders &#8212; gymnastics, aerials, and so forth.  Imagine my disappointment!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images Update (Jan. 2010) &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-207424</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images Update (Jan. 2010) &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 16:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-207424</guid>
		<description>[...] C. sent us a link to a slide show featuring 185 pictures of cheerleaders.  We added it to our post titled &#8220;What Warrants a Slide [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] C. sent us a link to a slide show featuring 185 pictures of cheerleaders.  We added it to our post titled &#8220;What Warrants a Slide [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CNN: &#8220;Is It Getting Too Much Coverage? We Better Cover It to See!&#8221; &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-202947</link>
		<dc:creator>CNN: &#8220;Is It Getting Too Much Coverage? We Better Cover It to See!&#8221; &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 08:17:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-202947</guid>
		<description>[...] also the guest post on media coverage of the George Sodini murders and what warrants a slideshow?        4 Comments     Tags: media, tv/movies     Woman Embodies The HIV Virus In Italian Ad [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] also the guest post on media coverage of the George Sodini murders and what warrants a slideshow?        4 Comments     Tags: media, tv/movies     Woman Embodies The HIV Virus In Italian Ad [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Redhead Metalhead</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-114915</link>
		<dc:creator>Redhead Metalhead</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 17:35:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-114915</guid>
		<description>Sorry I haven&#039;t replied in ages, Rina, but I just found this post again after a search.

First off, don&#039;t get picky with my words like that. It&#039;s quite rude, especially considering I&#039;m trying to sympathize here, but I guess that&#039;s not good enough for you.

Regardless, I don&#039;t consider your answer to my question reliable, especially considering that I am, in fact, a woman (I can understand why you might have thought that I was a man, although you would&#039;ve known that had you read my blog). Either way, I want a hard answer, not just something personal. In other words, I don&#039;t consider you saying that &quot;you and friends in the industry&quot; as a solid answer. You can&#039;t prove it to me that way.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry I haven&#8217;t replied in ages, Rina, but I just found this post again after a search.</p>
<p>First off, don&#8217;t get picky with my words like that. It&#8217;s quite rude, especially considering I&#8217;m trying to sympathize here, but I guess that&#8217;s not good enough for you.</p>
<p>Regardless, I don&#8217;t consider your answer to my question reliable, especially considering that I am, in fact, a woman (I can understand why you might have thought that I was a man, although you would&#8217;ve known that had you read my blog). Either way, I want a hard answer, not just something personal. In other words, I don&#8217;t consider you saying that &#8220;you and friends in the industry&#8221; as a solid answer. You can&#8217;t prove it to me that way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Annoyed</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-93495</link>
		<dc:creator>Annoyed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Aug 2009 16:21:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-93495</guid>
		<description>@Larry C Wilson:

You can&#039;t come on to a sociological blog and bitch about deconstructionism and well established sociological theory.  That is what you will see.  Brady is correct.  Sometimes it is hard to understand, and sometimes it is pretentious, and sometimes it is perfectly valid and you just don&#039;t understand it.  If you have problems with specific vocabularies, don&#039;t go into business, banking, medicine, or any academic field.  I can&#039;t imagine how a historian came to disdain critical analysis.  

Maybe when you were training to be a historian they trained you to list facts and not think about them.  But now historians have to do quite a bit of critical thinking.  And sometimes they even use theory and hard to understand words.

And yes, Katrina, there are people everywhere of every ethnicity that disdain critical thinking.  Sometimes the most oppressed are the most ardent supporters of the status quo.  But in Larry&#039;s case, I think they are right.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Larry C Wilson:</p>
<p>You can&#8217;t come on to a sociological blog and bitch about deconstructionism and well established sociological theory.  That is what you will see.  Brady is correct.  Sometimes it is hard to understand, and sometimes it is pretentious, and sometimes it is perfectly valid and you just don&#8217;t understand it.  If you have problems with specific vocabularies, don&#8217;t go into business, banking, medicine, or any academic field.  I can&#8217;t imagine how a historian came to disdain critical analysis.  </p>
<p>Maybe when you were training to be a historian they trained you to list facts and not think about them.  But now historians have to do quite a bit of critical thinking.  And sometimes they even use theory and hard to understand words.</p>
<p>And yes, Katrina, there are people everywhere of every ethnicity that disdain critical thinking.  Sometimes the most oppressed are the most ardent supporters of the status quo.  But in Larry&#8217;s case, I think they are right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; What We’ve Been Up To Behind Your Back (July 2009)</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-93146</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; What We’ve Been Up To Behind Your Back (July 2009)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 19:53:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-93146</guid>
		<description>[...] York called &#8220;Sex in the Sky.&#8221;  Kiera S. thought it would make a good addition to our &#8220;What Warrants a Slide Show&#8221; post.  We [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] York called &#8220;Sex in the Sky.&#8221;  Kiera S. thought it would make a good addition to our &#8220;What Warrants a Slide Show&#8221; post.  We [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; &#8220;Body Lexicon&#8221; for Aging Female Bodies</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-93058</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; &#8220;Body Lexicon&#8221; for Aging Female Bodies</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 15:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-93058</guid>
		<description>[...] recently asked, &#8220;What warrants a slide show on a newspaper&#8217;s website?&#8221; Denise L. sent in an article from the Life section of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently asked, &#8220;What warrants a slide show on a newspaper&#8217;s website?&#8221; Denise L. sent in an article from the Life section of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adam</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-70691</link>
		<dc:creator>adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 18:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-70691</guid>
		<description>The lingerie football league reminded me of the previous posts on how female athletes are expected to remain sexy (if not also heterosexual) for men to warrant celebrity attention and respect.

I mean, the women playing seem pretty in shape, but not in a way that would be optimal for American football. Plus, instead of having a barred face mask, they are wearing helmets with plastic protection so that the (male) audience can see their faces better. And the lingerie don&#039;t offer much protection from those cleats!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The lingerie football league reminded me of the previous posts on how female athletes are expected to remain sexy (if not also heterosexual) for men to warrant celebrity attention and respect.</p>
<p>I mean, the women playing seem pretty in shape, but not in a way that would be optimal for American football. Plus, instead of having a barred face mask, they are wearing helmets with plastic protection so that the (male) audience can see their faces better. And the lingerie don&#8217;t offer much protection from those cleats!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; What We’ve Been Up To Behind Your Back (June 2009)</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-70644</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; What We’ve Been Up To Behind Your Back (June 2009)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 17:16:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-70644</guid>
		<description>[...] League that apparently warranted a slide show with fifty-nine (59) photos. We added some to our post asking &#8220;What warrants a slide show?&#8221; (scroll [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] League that apparently warranted a slide show with fifty-nine (59) photos. We added some to our post asking &#8220;What warrants a slide show?&#8221; (scroll [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katrina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-53498</link>
		<dc:creator>Katrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 20:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-53498</guid>
		<description>Ensor hits nothing on the head. There are women, even women of color (gasp!!) who are critical of deconstructionism, post-modernism,  and the like....So much for what one can gain from Endor&#039;s ad hominem...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ensor hits nothing on the head. There are women, even women of color (gasp!!) who are critical of deconstructionism, post-modernism,  and the like&#8230;.So much for what one can gain from Endor&#8217;s ad hominem&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-52225</link>
		<dc:creator>Gina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 01:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-52225</guid>
		<description>Endor, you have hit the nail on the head.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Endor, you have hit the nail on the head.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brady</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-52116</link>
		<dc:creator>Brady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 21:02:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-52116</guid>
		<description>Can I just put on my theory nerd hat for a minute and remark that there is a big difference between a sociologically-informed critical reading of some image and &quot;deconstruction&quot; in the sense that Derrida and his followers wrote about it, which as far as I understand it describes inherent features/puzzles of language use, not an intentional act by a reader who is trying to tease out a coded message?

(Then again, I could be wrong about that. Derrida makes Bourdieu look like Seuss.)

It is one of my biggest theory pet peeves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can I just put on my theory nerd hat for a minute and remark that there is a big difference between a sociologically-informed critical reading of some image and &#8220;deconstruction&#8221; in the sense that Derrida and his followers wrote about it, which as far as I understand it describes inherent features/puzzles of language use, not an intentional act by a reader who is trying to tease out a coded message?</p>
<p>(Then again, I could be wrong about that. Derrida makes Bourdieu look like Seuss.)</p>
<p>It is one of my biggest theory pet peeves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Endor</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/06/06/what-warrants-a-slide-show/comment-page-1/#comment-52020</link>
		<dc:creator>Endor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2009 17:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=9493#comment-52020</guid>
		<description>&quot;ut of course I’m just a 66-year-old white male historian who rejects deconstructionism in all its forms.&quot;

Translation:  I rest on privilege to make excuses for my lack of empathy for non66-year-old-white-males.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;ut of course I’m just a 66-year-old white male historian who rejects deconstructionism in all its forms.&#8221;</p>
<p>Translation:  I rest on privilege to make excuses for my lack of empathy for non66-year-old-white-males.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

