<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: &#8220;Why Spoil The View?&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 18:01:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: al oof</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-29556</link>
		<dc:creator>al oof</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 03:35:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8622#comment-29556</guid>
		<description>i always thought it was weird that panty lines weren&#039;t supposed to be seen, but we also weren&#039;t supposed to not wear underwear.  i mean, i was a little kid then.  but i still think it&#039;s weird with the whole thong thing.  i mean, they were created to eliminate panty line, but then it became attractive to show you were wearing a thong.  thongs may be one of the least sexy undergarments i&#039;ve ever seen. 

but it always seemed to me, if you don&#039;t want it to look like you&#039;re wearing underpants, don&#039;t wear underpants.  easy!

oh, and i don&#039;t know about underalls specifically, but i&#039;m pretty sure all pantyhose are linked to yeast infections, but not in a way that would make the medical establishment try outlaw them like talcum powder crotch powder.  any nonbreathable crotch (nylon underpants are no good either) is linked to yeast infections.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i always thought it was weird that panty lines weren&#8217;t supposed to be seen, but we also weren&#8217;t supposed to not wear underwear.  i mean, i was a little kid then.  but i still think it&#8217;s weird with the whole thong thing.  i mean, they were created to eliminate panty line, but then it became attractive to show you were wearing a thong.  thongs may be one of the least sexy undergarments i&#8217;ve ever seen. </p>
<p>but it always seemed to me, if you don&#8217;t want it to look like you&#8217;re wearing underpants, don&#8217;t wear underpants.  easy!</p>
<p>oh, and i don&#8217;t know about underalls specifically, but i&#8217;m pretty sure all pantyhose are linked to yeast infections, but not in a way that would make the medical establishment try outlaw them like talcum powder crotch powder.  any nonbreathable crotch (nylon underpants are no good either) is linked to yeast infections.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-29235</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 19:22:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8622#comment-29235</guid>
		<description>So, did lined skirts, half slips and similar articles of clothing get suddenly out of fashion, or what? Because I&#039;ve never worn a skirt of a cloth so filmy that the panties would be seen through it and however so tight that the panties&#039; seams would be noticed.

(Okay, I don&#039;t wear skirts that often. But the one I bought yesterday for a family event is a summer skirt with a lining)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, did lined skirts, half slips and similar articles of clothing get suddenly out of fashion, or what? Because I&#8217;ve never worn a skirt of a cloth so filmy that the panties would be seen through it and however so tight that the panties&#8217; seams would be noticed.</p>
<p>(Okay, I don&#8217;t wear skirts that often. But the one I bought yesterday for a family event is a summer skirt with a lining)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linda</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-28995</link>
		<dc:creator>Linda</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2009 02:41:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8622#comment-28995</guid>
		<description>Oh, wow. I remember this commercial. I&#039;d forgotten, but this brings it all back -- I was *terrified* of panty lines.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, wow. I remember this commercial. I&#8217;d forgotten, but this brings it all back &#8212; I was *terrified* of panty lines.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Libby</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-28941</link>
		<dc:creator>Libby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 23:04:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8622#comment-28941</guid>
		<description>I heard that these were pulled off the shelf because they were found to be linked with an increase in yeast infections. Ugh.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard that these were pulled off the shelf because they were found to be linked with an increase in yeast infections. Ugh.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Duran</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-28907</link>
		<dc:creator>Duran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:46:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8622#comment-28907</guid>
		<description>Since when did marketing have anything to do with common sense?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since when did marketing have anything to do with common sense?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gexx</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/25/why-spoil-the-view/comment-page-1/#comment-28877</link>
		<dc:creator>gexx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 18:57:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8622#comment-28877</guid>
		<description>ok... women&#039; s bodies being seen as public oogling property aside. 

Why would you wear pantyhose when camping or hang gliding?  I call this a general commonsense fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>ok&#8230; women&#8217; s bodies being seen as public oogling property aside. </p>
<p>Why would you wear pantyhose when camping or hang gliding?  I call this a general commonsense fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

