<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Who is Facebook?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-548463</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Mar 2012 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-548463</guid>
		<description>This is stupid! If avatars were created as generic genderless beings, why were some of them look male? That makes it unreal and unfair. It also makes it sound like the male and white as &quot;universal&quot;. Screw that!!! We should celebrate differences and respect who we are. You can never ignore us or deny our humanity because we can&#039;t be all the same and see it as the norm. We should accept differences and to say differences is embraced.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is stupid! If avatars were created as generic genderless beings, why were some of them look male? That makes it unreal and unfair. It also makes it sound like the male and white as &#8220;universal&#8221;. Screw that!!! We should celebrate differences and respect who we are. You can never ignore us or deny our humanity because we can&#8217;t be all the same and see it as the norm. We should accept differences and to say differences is embraced.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: אקלקטיקה אהובתי &#187; פייסבוק, גוגל, צלליות ומודעות מגדרית</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-522838</link>
		<dc:creator>אקלקטיקה אהובתי &#187; פייסבוק, גוגל, צלליות ומודעות מגדרית</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jul 2011 10:29:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-522838</guid>
		<description>[...] אישית. לא הסתבכות גדולה, זה נכון, אבל הנה כתבה על הנושא באתר Sociological Images מלפני כשנתיים, שעוררה קצת גלים באתרים אחרים שמוקדשים [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] אישית. לא הסתבכות גדולה, זה נכון, אבל הנה כתבה על הנושא באתר Sociological Images מלפני כשנתיים, שעוררה קצת גלים באתרים אחרים שמוקדשים [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Murray</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-458958</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Murray</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Mar 2011 02:54:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-458958</guid>
		<description>“the orange is supposed to be a sort of compromise skin colour.”

No, orange is the complementary colour of blue, which is what the oceans are in that logo. Perhaps a little less politics and a little more graphic design is in order, if graphic design is what you want to critique.

See #4 on this list:
http://www.cracked.com/article_18664_5-annoying-trends-that-make-every-movie-look-same.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“the orange is supposed to be a sort of compromise skin colour.”</p>
<p>No, orange is the complementary colour of blue, which is what the oceans are in that logo. Perhaps a little less politics and a little more graphic design is in order, if graphic design is what you want to critique.</p>
<p>See #4 on this list:<br />
<a href="http://www.cracked.com/article_18664_5-annoying-trends-that-make-every-movie-look-same.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.cracked.com/article_18664_5-annoying-trends-that-make-every-movie-look-same.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eva</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-375199</link>
		<dc:creator>Eva</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 19:01:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-375199</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m surprised this hasn&#039;t been pointed out (or perhaps I missed the comment), but the &quot;neutral&quot; Facebook avatar is a testament to the narcissism of Facebook&#039;s creator: the &quot;neutral&quot; avatar is a stylized silhouette of Mark Zuckerberg. Originally, the default profile picture on Facebook was a question mark, and the logo in the top left-hand corner of the site was a stylized Mark Zuckerberg (light blue head/torso on a darker blue background, with the facial features lightened so much as to be almost indistinguishable). That logo was taken down at some point during the massive expansion of Facebook, and the silhouette replaced the punctuation mark as default profile picture. So in this case, it&#039;s not a sexist/racist default avatar, it&#039;s a narcissist default avatar -- a likeness of someone who just so happens to be male and white (and young and with short hair and and and...).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m surprised this hasn&#8217;t been pointed out (or perhaps I missed the comment), but the &#8220;neutral&#8221; Facebook avatar is a testament to the narcissism of Facebook&#8217;s creator: the &#8220;neutral&#8221; avatar is a stylized silhouette of Mark Zuckerberg. Originally, the default profile picture on Facebook was a question mark, and the logo in the top left-hand corner of the site was a stylized Mark Zuckerberg (light blue head/torso on a darker blue background, with the facial features lightened so much as to be almost indistinguishable). That logo was taken down at some point during the massive expansion of Facebook, and the silhouette replaced the punctuation mark as default profile picture. So in this case, it&#8217;s not a sexist/racist default avatar, it&#8217;s a narcissist default avatar &#8212; a likeness of someone who just so happens to be male and white (and young and with short hair and and and&#8230;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hill</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-372806</link>
		<dc:creator>Hill</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 15:57:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-372806</guid>
		<description>I always thought the default avatar was Alison Bechdel.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always thought the default avatar was Alison Bechdel.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Feministe&#8217;s Epic Fail in Intersectionality &#171; HEPFAT</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-372177</link>
		<dc:creator>Feministe&#8217;s Epic Fail in Intersectionality &#171; HEPFAT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 16:44:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-372177</guid>
		<description>[...] a read if you need help understanding why feminism is for all types of women &#8211; not just your &#8220;default woman&#8221; (who is probably thin and [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a read if you need help understanding why feminism is for all types of women &#8211; not just your &#8220;default woman&#8221; (who is probably thin and [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alice</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-372042</link>
		<dc:creator>Alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 08:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-372042</guid>
		<description>I find all this to be a massive stretch. First of all, caucasian skin isn&#039;t white. Second, if you&#039;re going to complain about the default avatar&#039;s white &quot;skin&quot;, then I&#039;m going to be a little creeped out by the fact that it also has white hair and is wearing white clothes.

It&#039;s a silhouette. An OUTLINE. The person depicted in that avatar is no more white than they are standing in front of clear, blue skies: it&#039;s an abstract colour scheme. There is no race involved, much like there is no eye colour or age involved. I guess the only thing you can viably complain about is the fact that the outline is slim (&quot;Where is the representation of overweight people? Rah rah!&quot;).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find all this to be a massive stretch. First of all, caucasian skin isn&#8217;t white. Second, if you&#8217;re going to complain about the default avatar&#8217;s white &#8220;skin&#8221;, then I&#8217;m going to be a little creeped out by the fact that it also has white hair and is wearing white clothes.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a silhouette. An OUTLINE. The person depicted in that avatar is no more white than they are standing in front of clear, blue skies: it&#8217;s an abstract colour scheme. There is no race involved, much like there is no eye colour or age involved. I guess the only thing you can viably complain about is the fact that the outline is slim (&#8220;Where is the representation of overweight people? Rah rah!&#8221;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mint</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-371997</link>
		<dc:creator>Mint</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:51:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-371997</guid>
		<description>I think it looks like the top of a can of spray paint.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it looks like the top of a can of spray paint.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: n</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-371984</link>
		<dc:creator>n</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 04:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-371984</guid>
		<description>new avatar looks like a penis to me</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>new avatar looks like a penis to me</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Natalie</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-371915</link>
		<dc:creator>Natalie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 21:34:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-371915</guid>
		<description>Snap. That&#039;s exactly what I was thinking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Snap. That&#8217;s exactly what I was thinking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-371900</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Sep 2010 20:40:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-371900</guid>
		<description>The new &quot;female&quot; avatar looks like Darth Vader to me...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The new &#8220;female&#8221; avatar looks like Darth Vader to me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daszign</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-341453</link>
		<dc:creator>daszign</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jul 2010 16:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-341453</guid>
		<description>Dude.  I can tell you why the silouettes in the map graphic are orange.  Facebook&#039;s color scheme is blue and white.  Always has been.  Default avatar could either be blue on white or white on blue.

But overlaying avatars w/a map of the world forces you to add a third color, at least if you want the avatars to be remotely clear/discernible.  So what color do you use?

I personally might have gone for yellow -- I&#039;m sure it was tried out -- but orange is stronger, less lemony and springtimey and feminine (and, I guess also less open to interpretation as &quot;Asian&quot;).  Pure red would be too USA/angry.  I suppose green would have been another option, but if you want a warm contrast instead of a cool compliment to your blue and white then orange is where you end up.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude.  I can tell you why the silouettes in the map graphic are orange.  Facebook&#8217;s color scheme is blue and white.  Always has been.  Default avatar could either be blue on white or white on blue.</p>
<p>But overlaying avatars w/a map of the world forces you to add a third color, at least if you want the avatars to be remotely clear/discernible.  So what color do you use?</p>
<p>I personally might have gone for yellow &#8212; I&#8217;m sure it was tried out &#8212; but orange is stronger, less lemony and springtimey and feminine (and, I guess also less open to interpretation as &#8220;Asian&#8221;).  Pure red would be too USA/angry.  I suppose green would have been another option, but if you want a warm contrast instead of a cool compliment to your blue and white then orange is where you end up.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ren</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-239419</link>
		<dc:creator>Ren</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 23:59:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-239419</guid>
		<description>Oh, gee. Because any silhouette rather than outline means the person is black, right?

And, uh, females DEFINITELY can&#039;t hair haircuts like that. Because I&#039;m not female with a haircut like that at all.

No, I think the problem is that the default icon is not heteronormative enough. Girls can&#039;t choose girly, long haired icons! GOSH!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh, gee. Because any silhouette rather than outline means the person is black, right?</p>
<p>And, uh, females DEFINITELY can&#8217;t hair haircuts like that. Because I&#8217;m not female with a haircut like that at all.</p>
<p>No, I think the problem is that the default icon is not heteronormative enough. Girls can&#8217;t choose girly, long haired icons! GOSH!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nemo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-2/#comment-215330</link>
		<dc:creator>Nemo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-215330</guid>
		<description>Try to picture that sihuette as female or even black and you may get a hard time...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Try to picture that sihuette as female or even black and you may get a hard time&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JH</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/15/who-is-facebook/comment-page-1/#comment-195941</link>
		<dc:creator>JH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 16:54:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8422#comment-195941</guid>
		<description>again, like many before me, I have to agree with the idea that the avatar is blank, not &quot;white&quot;. And it&#039;s gender is also very questionable. People do tend to overthink some things. There is enough racism and discrimination in this world as it is, let&#039;s not try to find even more...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>again, like many before me, I have to agree with the idea that the avatar is blank, not &#8220;white&#8221;. And it&#8217;s gender is also very questionable. People do tend to overthink some things. There is enough racism and discrimination in this world as it is, let&#8217;s not try to find even more&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

