<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Illustrating the media&#8217;s Obsession with Michelle Obama&#8217;s Clothes and Body</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kyra Morris</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-528306</link>
		<dc:creator>Kyra Morris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jul 2011 18:38:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-528306</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s actually 1. true that they perceived to be &quot;part&quot; of women&#039;s sex appealy parts- i have no idea where the study is... 2. OLD SCHOOL. It&#039;s a big violation to uncover the arms in a gendered &quot;professional&quot; (conservative) environment. In those environments, keeping up with fashion outside of formal events is also thought of as something of a transgression, even when it&#039;s more age appropriate for the wearer. 3. The arms thing is that most are really weird about actual physical fitness and strength in women. I mean EFFING NUTS. We both know it&#039;s not like she&#039;s cut, but any visible strength at all is looked upon as an anomaly in women.
I think it&#039;s due to white female health being depicted solely as thinness (weakness) and it being held as the standard for &quot;femininity&quot; across the board.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually 1. true that they perceived to be &#8220;part&#8221; of women&#8217;s sex appealy parts- i have no idea where the study is&#8230; 2. OLD SCHOOL. It&#8217;s a big violation to uncover the arms in a gendered &#8220;professional&#8221; (conservative) environment. In those environments, keeping up with fashion outside of formal events is also thought of as something of a transgression, even when it&#8217;s more age appropriate for the wearer. 3. The arms thing is that most are really weird about actual physical fitness and strength in women. I mean EFFING NUTS. We both know it&#8217;s not like she&#8217;s cut, but any visible strength at all is looked upon as an anomaly in women.<br />
I think it&#8217;s due to white female health being depicted solely as thinness (weakness) and it being held as the standard for &#8220;femininity&#8221; across the board.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-413137</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Nov 2010 18:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-413137</guid>
		<description>Interesting--I was reading a bunch of posts about the fetishes in the US and abroad with the black female body--particularly, the butt. In the Daily Show&#039;s satire, during the fashion show, they decided that the transparent part of the dress was to be the ass. Hm....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting&#8211;I was reading a bunch of posts about the fetishes in the US and abroad with the black female body&#8211;particularly, the butt. In the Daily Show&#8217;s satire, during the fashion show, they decided that the transparent part of the dress was to be the ass. Hm&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mary McGuire</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-143618</link>
		<dc:creator>Mary McGuire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 01:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-143618</guid>
		<description>I hope this comment shows up. I have commented before and I cannot see it here. This obsession with Michelle&#039;s clothes is typical of the media, it&#039;s as if the only important thing about a woman is how she looks or what she is wearing. I thought feminism was supposed address that type of blindness. Then I have to ask the question; who dictates what the media focus on? Are they leading the way or are we inadvertently pushing them by our interest. When I say we I mean society not necessarily you or I.  lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hope this comment shows up. I have commented before and I cannot see it here. This obsession with Michelle&#8217;s clothes is typical of the media, it&#8217;s as if the only important thing about a woman is how she looks or what she is wearing. I thought feminism was supposed address that type of blindness. Then I have to ask the question; who dictates what the media focus on? Are they leading the way or are we inadvertently pushing them by our interest. When I say we I mean society not necessarily you or I.  lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; What We&#8217;ve Been Up To Behind Your Back (April 2009)</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-30114</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; What We&#8217;ve Been Up To Behind Your Back (April 2009)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 18:53:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-30114</guid>
		<description>[...] the obsession with Michelle Obama&#8217;s clothes.  Andrea G. sent in the link and we added it to our collection of examples of this obsession.  We also added a picture of the cover of a new book: Michelle Style: Celebrating the First Lady [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the obsession with Michelle Obama&#8217;s clothes.  Andrea G. sent in the link and we added it to our collection of examples of this obsession.  We also added a picture of the cover of a new book: Michelle Style: Celebrating the First Lady [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Sexification of Michelle Obama - Whatever Is Right</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-22601</link>
		<dc:creator>The Sexification of Michelle Obama - Whatever Is Right</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 21:08:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-22601</guid>
		<description>[...] as ridiculous as the media&#8217;s obsession with Michelle touching the queen, her taste in clothes, and those enviable arms of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as ridiculous as the media&#8217;s obsession with Michelle touching the queen, her taste in clothes, and those enviable arms of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Megan</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-22343</link>
		<dc:creator>Megan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 07:09:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-22343</guid>
		<description>The obsession with Michelle Obama&#039;s arms is especially disturbing. It&#039;s &quot;inappropriate&quot; to wear sleeveless dresses? When did the upper arms become a sex organ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obsession with Michelle Obama&#8217;s arms is especially disturbing. It&#8217;s &#8220;inappropriate&#8221; to wear sleeveless dresses? When did the upper arms become a sex organ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sabriel</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-22301</link>
		<dc:creator>Sabriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Apr 2009 04:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-22301</guid>
		<description>The other day I saw an internet advertisement that was aimed at women, and it looked just like those diet advertisements with before and after pictures of a stomach, only instead it was before and after pictures of an arm. 

It said &quot;Get arms like Michelle Obama!&quot;

I thought it was really funny. I guess women are supposed to have big arms now, huh? Another thing to worry about.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The other day I saw an internet advertisement that was aimed at women, and it looked just like those diet advertisements with before and after pictures of a stomach, only instead it was before and after pictures of an arm. </p>
<p>It said &#8220;Get arms like Michelle Obama!&#8221;</p>
<p>I thought it was really funny. I guess women are supposed to have big arms now, huh? Another thing to worry about.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ld</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-22217</link>
		<dc:creator>ld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 21:57:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-22217</guid>
		<description>the video(s) aren&#039;t showing up for me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the video(s) aren&#8217;t showing up for me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-22149</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 18:06:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-22149</guid>
		<description>Thanks for posting these. It seems like every time I hear about Michelle Obama on the news, it&#039;s followed by something about her fashion sense!

(P.S. It looks like you posted the second clip twice...)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for posting these. It seems like every time I hear about Michelle Obama on the news, it&#8217;s followed by something about her fashion sense!</p>
<p>(P.S. It looks like you posted the second clip twice&#8230;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jennifer</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/04/07/illustrating-the-medias-obsession-with-michelle-obamas-clothes-and-body/comment-page-1/#comment-22011</link>
		<dc:creator>Jennifer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2009 07:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8198#comment-22011</guid>
		<description>I have been following the media hype surrounding Michelle Obama&#039;s body for a while - most recently I read a post regarding the obsession &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.wiretapmag.org/bloggers/jacinto/44068/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt; as well as the Slate XX blog and Feministing. 

Thanks for these clips! So frustrating and informative at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been following the media hype surrounding Michelle Obama&#8217;s body for a while &#8211; most recently I read a post regarding the obsession <a href="http://www.wiretapmag.org/bloggers/jacinto/44068/" rel="nofollow">here</a> as well as the Slate XX blog and Feministing. </p>
<p>Thanks for these clips! So frustrating and informative at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

