<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another Peek into the Re-Touching Process</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 14:45:45 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images Update (Feb. 2010) &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-229111</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images Update (Feb. 2010) &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 15:48:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-229111</guid>
		<description>[...] we updated one of our posts about retouching with two examples of a photoshopped Demi Moore.  var addthis_language = &#039;en&#039;;       Leave a Comment [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we updated one of our posts about retouching with two examples of a photoshopped Demi Moore.  var addthis_language = &#39;en&#39;;       Leave a Comment [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: People Asks, &#8220;Has Heidi Montag&#8217;s Plastic Surgery Gone Too Far?&#8221; &#124; Jack-Booted Liberal</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-196670</link>
		<dc:creator>People Asks, &#8220;Has Heidi Montag&#8217;s Plastic Surgery Gone Too Far?&#8221; &#124; Jack-Booted Liberal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 04:27:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-196670</guid>
		<description>[...] who can blame her? Magazine covers regularly Photoshop already stunningly-beautiful people (link link link link) to further &#8220;enhance&#8221; them into completely fantastical realms of physical [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] who can blame her? Magazine covers regularly Photoshop already stunningly-beautiful people (link link link link) to further &#8220;enhance&#8221; them into completely fantastical realms of physical [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just passing through</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-20016</link>
		<dc:creator>Just passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-20016</guid>
		<description>Whit, both of these are a problem.  But the fact that people are denying the fact that she is lighter is why it is getting more discussion.  But yes, both those issues you brought up are problems with this picture.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whit, both of these are a problem.  But the fact that people are denying the fact that she is lighter is why it is getting more discussion.  But yes, both those issues you brought up are problems with this picture.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just passing through</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-20014</link>
		<dc:creator>Just passing through</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 20:11:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-20014</guid>
		<description>Skin color IS one of them.  I do not think it would be that difficult to figure out how to lighten the background without lightening the person.  The fact of the matter is that our society favors people with lighter skin, lighter hair, and lighter eyes.  Our society is racist through and through, but these are much more subtle than the racism of 100 years ago, or even 60 years ago.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Skin color IS one of them.  I do not think it would be that difficult to figure out how to lighten the background without lightening the person.  The fact of the matter is that our society favors people with lighter skin, lighter hair, and lighter eyes.  Our society is racist through and through, but these are much more subtle than the racism of 100 years ago, or even 60 years ago.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Whit</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-19563</link>
		<dc:creator>Whit</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-19563</guid>
		<description>Why is it a problem that she got whitened, but not de-&quot;fat&quot;ted? Srsly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is it a problem that she got whitened, but not de-&#8221;fat&#8221;ted? Srsly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thewhatifgirl</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-19152</link>
		<dc:creator>thewhatifgirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:14:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-19152</guid>
		<description>I initially thought she looked whiter too, but when I examined the rest of the picture, I realized they lightened the whole thing (the reason why is most obvious, I think, if you look at where the belt is - it&#039;s hard to see it in the untouched photo but more defined in the touched-up photo - but you can also tell just by looking at the background).  There is an ideal light level for photographs that means this kind of all-over lightening is often required, even with the prepared studio work.  (Lightening also has a tendency to wash out certain very tiny &quot;imperfections&quot;.)

Which is not to say that there aren&#039;t problems with these photos but that skin color is probably not one of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I initially thought she looked whiter too, but when I examined the rest of the picture, I realized they lightened the whole thing (the reason why is most obvious, I think, if you look at where the belt is &#8211; it&#8217;s hard to see it in the untouched photo but more defined in the touched-up photo &#8211; but you can also tell just by looking at the background).  There is an ideal light level for photographs that means this kind of all-over lightening is often required, even with the prepared studio work.  (Lightening also has a tendency to wash out certain very tiny &#8220;imperfections&#8221;.)</p>
<p>Which is not to say that there aren&#8217;t problems with these photos but that skin color is probably not one of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chilligan</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-18185</link>
		<dc:creator>Chilligan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:59:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-18185</guid>
		<description>Yeah, legs look whiter, and generally the skin tone is more uniform. Its getting to the point that its too obvious these days... that you look at it and think &#039;fake&#039; rather than &#039;man, s/he looks great.&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, legs look whiter, and generally the skin tone is more uniform. Its getting to the point that its too obvious these days&#8230; that you look at it and think &#8216;fake&#8217; rather than &#8216;man, s/he looks great.&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: CJ :)</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-18175</link>
		<dc:creator>CJ :)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:32:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-18175</guid>
		<description>I think she does look like they lightened her skin using light effects.  That&#039;s pretty sad.  I mean, all of it is ridiculous, but why did they feel the need to make her look lighter?  *sigh*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think she does look like they lightened her skin using light effects.  That&#8217;s pretty sad.  I mean, all of it is ridiculous, but why did they feel the need to make her look lighter?  *sigh*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elena</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-18025</link>
		<dc:creator>Elena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 20:40:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-18025</guid>
		<description>She&#039;s also gotten a tummy lift and a liposuction  in her thighs, and her arm and back (compare the empty space between arm and torso) have also lost some fat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>She&#8217;s also gotten a tummy lift and a liposuction  in her thighs, and her arm and back (compare the empty space between arm and torso) have also lost some fat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Franklin S.</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-17960</link>
		<dc:creator>Franklin S.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 18:13:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-17960</guid>
		<description>Check out the Gawker post (where I originally saw this) which includes an animated gif comparing the two images and a list of changes.

http://gawker.com/5184270/14-ways-photoshopped-kim-kardashian-was-made-hotter</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Check out the Gawker post (where I originally saw this) which includes an animated gif comparing the two images and a list of changes.</p>
<p><a href="http://gawker.com/5184270/14-ways-photoshopped-kim-kardashian-was-made-hotter" rel="nofollow">http://gawker.com/5184270/14-ways-photoshopped-kim-kardashian-was-made-hotter</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-17916</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 16:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-17916</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think she looks whiter, but her skin does look more even, and much fewer veins are visible.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think she looks whiter, but her skin does look more even, and much fewer veins are visible.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vettekaas</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-17899</link>
		<dc:creator>Vettekaas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 15:30:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-17899</guid>
		<description>wow... she looks... whiter x-(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow&#8230; she looks&#8230; whiter x-(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/03/28/8037/comment-page-1/#comment-17778</link>
		<dc:creator>A</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 10:27:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=8037#comment-17778</guid>
		<description>Peek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Peek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

