<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Representing Sexually Transmitted Diseases</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Choi_carvz</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-531562</link>
		<dc:creator>Choi_carvz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2011 02:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-531562</guid>
		<description>there is something in the skin of my penis in which at first it was just a small boil in my penis....but one day as i sleep, i felt that it hurts when i sleep in the form of planking and at morning i,d seen that it became larger and now it has a white color blood...i don&#039;t know why this happen to me...i wasn&#039;t able to have sex with someone...

can u help me to cure this one...pls..?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there is something in the skin of my penis in which at first it was just a small boil in my penis&#8230;.but one day as i sleep, i felt that it hurts when i sleep in the form of planking and at morning i,d seen that it became larger and now it has a white color blood&#8230;i don&#8217;t know why this happen to me&#8230;i wasn&#8217;t able to have sex with someone&#8230;</p>
<p>can u help me to cure this one&#8230;pls..?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dialurdoctor Medrx</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-529396</link>
		<dc:creator>Dialurdoctor Medrx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jul 2011 11:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-529396</guid>
		<description>Now its very easy to contact with doctor .http://www.dialurdoctor.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now its very easy to contact with doctor .<a href="http://www.dialurdoctor.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.dialurdoctor.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guest Post: Something Stinks…About This GlaxoSmithKline Ad &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-248670</link>
		<dc:creator>Guest Post: Something Stinks…About This GlaxoSmithKline Ad &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 15:47:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-248670</guid>
		<description>[...] posts by Adina include her thoughts on how STDs are represented visually in sex education (NSFW), the HPV vaccine for boys, and the beauty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] posts by Adina include her thoughts on how STDs are represented visually in sex education (NSFW), the HPV vaccine for boys, and the beauty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adjanae</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-160248</link>
		<dc:creator>adjanae</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Dec 2009 22:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-160248</guid>
		<description>people need to help the world instead of having sex wit each other because it&#039;s to many diseases and it&#039;s sad.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>people need to help the world instead of having sex wit each other because it&#8217;s to many diseases and it&#8217;s sad.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; Guest Post: Naomi Wolf On The Beauty Myth</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-86697</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; Guest Post: Naomi Wolf On The Beauty Myth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:50:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-86697</guid>
		<description>[...] out in 2008.  You can see an earlier post of hers, about sexually transmitted disease and stigma, here.          tags: beauty, bodies, capitalism, gender&#124; Permalink&#124;  Comments (0)      What Do People [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] out in 2008.  You can see an earlier post of hers, about sexually transmitted disease and stigma, here.          tags: beauty, bodies, capitalism, gender| Permalink|  Comments (0)      What Do People [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SKHC</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-25293</link>
		<dc:creator>SKHC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:47:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-25293</guid>
		<description>Much more comprehensive education of K-12 is needed but then it needs more advanced training in 9-12 and in college. Too many kids get the sex ed class once, it&#039;s too basic and never repeated. Or they don&#039;t get it again when they are young adults who can handle more depth. I work for a healthcare supply company who is the only company in our space catering to k-12 and colleges who offers a full line of sex education and sexual health products. I think more of us need to do our part to ensure these products are available to teachers, school nurses, phys. ed instructors, coaches, and parents.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Much more comprehensive education of K-12 is needed but then it needs more advanced training in 9-12 and in college. Too many kids get the sex ed class once, it&#8217;s too basic and never repeated. Or they don&#8217;t get it again when they are young adults who can handle more depth. I work for a healthcare supply company who is the only company in our space catering to k-12 and colleges who offers a full line of sex education and sexual health products. I think more of us need to do our part to ensure these products are available to teachers, school nurses, phys. ed instructors, coaches, and parents.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hexy</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-11327</link>
		<dc:creator>hexy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Mar 2009 11:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-11327</guid>
		<description>Sarah:

&lt;I&gt;Maybe some calculations along the lines of ‘if you have unprotected sex with three partners you have a x% chance of contracting herpes.’&lt;/I&gt;

I&#039;ve seen a poster aimed at gay men along those lines. It says something like &quot;If you&#039;ve had unprotected sex with eight men, chances are one of them was HIV positive.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah:</p>
<p><i>Maybe some calculations along the lines of ‘if you have unprotected sex with three partners you have a x% chance of contracting herpes.’</i></p>
<p>I&#8217;ve seen a poster aimed at gay men along those lines. It says something like &#8220;If you&#8217;ve had unprotected sex with eight men, chances are one of them was HIV positive.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Azalea</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-10747</link>
		<dc:creator>Azalea</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 23:17:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-10747</guid>
		<description>I think if such tasteful ads as the one proposed above were used in combination of how something as beautiful as the &quot;tasteful&quot; picture could lead to something as ugly as the much more graphic one the point would be driven home of the importance of proection against HIV/AIDS. However the bulk of the conversation about sex ed is more about preventing unwanted pregnancies as if STDs don&#039;t occur much much more often than pregnancy and certainly much more than childbirth ever will. Considering that you make babies the same way you pass along or contract STDs/STIs if more of an emphasis was placed on how to prevent STDs/STIs and their realistic prevelance then we&#039;d have far less unwanted pregnancy and STI/STD transmission via prevention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think if such tasteful ads as the one proposed above were used in combination of how something as beautiful as the &#8220;tasteful&#8221; picture could lead to something as ugly as the much more graphic one the point would be driven home of the importance of proection against HIV/AIDS. However the bulk of the conversation about sex ed is more about preventing unwanted pregnancies as if STDs don&#8217;t occur much much more often than pregnancy and certainly much more than childbirth ever will. Considering that you make babies the same way you pass along or contract STDs/STIs if more of an emphasis was placed on how to prevent STDs/STIs and their realistic prevelance then we&#8217;d have far less unwanted pregnancy and STI/STD transmission via prevention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NancyP</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-10739</link>
		<dc:creator>NancyP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Mar 2009 22:55:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-10739</guid>
		<description>Some people with multiple condylomas (warts) are simply in denial or are scared or embarrassed - untreated disease isn&#039;t always related to poverty, etc. Men in particular are prone not to deal with it, as  some are afraid that treating a lesion on the penis means amputation, and some with anal warts are afraid that they will be identified as gay/bisexual/punk/victim (their medical providers will certainly correctly classify them as having been MSM men who had/have sex with men, whatever the identification or circumstance was). I find it unfortunate that women who should know better (medical workers) feel ashamed of having an HPV infection - the scarlet H. 

Personally, I&#039;d be inclined to keep the scare picture, put an equivalent with a single small wart and a normal looking equivalent next to the scare picture, and state - all these people can transmit HPV to other people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Some people with multiple condylomas (warts) are simply in denial or are scared or embarrassed &#8211; untreated disease isn&#8217;t always related to poverty, etc. Men in particular are prone not to deal with it, as  some are afraid that treating a lesion on the penis means amputation, and some with anal warts are afraid that they will be identified as gay/bisexual/punk/victim (their medical providers will certainly correctly classify them as having been MSM men who had/have sex with men, whatever the identification or circumstance was). I find it unfortunate that women who should know better (medical workers) feel ashamed of having an HPV infection &#8211; the scarlet H. </p>
<p>Personally, I&#8217;d be inclined to keep the scare picture, put an equivalent with a single small wart and a normal looking equivalent next to the scare picture, and state &#8211; all these people can transmit HPV to other people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-7556</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 04:35:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-7556</guid>
		<description>I agree that normalising STDs as above is important - I also think we under-utilise stats. Maybe some calculations along the lines of &#039;if you have unprotected sex with three partners you have a x% chance of contracting herpes.&#039; We need to stop people from thinking that STDs happen to &#039;other&#039; people.

As for HPV it is a toughie as it is so incredibly common. I do think the HPV vaccine represents in important step in making the connection between cervical cancer and STDs (i.e. true prevention) and would love to see more discussion around the fact that it is down to HPV being so common that we&#039;ve got population-based screening programmes for cervical cancer.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree that normalising STDs as above is important &#8211; I also think we under-utilise stats. Maybe some calculations along the lines of &#8216;if you have unprotected sex with three partners you have a x% chance of contracting herpes.&#8217; We need to stop people from thinking that STDs happen to &#8216;other&#8217; people.</p>
<p>As for HPV it is a toughie as it is so incredibly common. I do think the HPV vaccine represents in important step in making the connection between cervical cancer and STDs (i.e. true prevention) and would love to see more discussion around the fact that it is down to HPV being so common that we&#8217;ve got population-based screening programmes for cervical cancer.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katharine</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-7545</link>
		<dc:creator>Katharine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:30:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-7545</guid>
		<description>This is somewhat of a tangent, but after I thought about the smoker&#039;s lung poster, I recalled how desensitized I became to its message after seeing it so many times.  &quot;Yes, yes - that&#039;s gross, don&#039;t smoke, whatever.&quot;  And I went on to become a smoker because a cigarette a day was not going to turn my lungs into THAT.

Then I saw the PSA Yul Brenner filmed shortly before his death of lung cancer.  (Most have probably seen it, but if not:  &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNjunlWUJJI&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;here&lt;/a&gt;.)  As grossed out as I was as a kid looking at that poster, it had NOWHERE near the impact on me that Brenner&#039;s words did when I first heard them in my 20s.

I know this isn&#039;t a post about anti-smoking campaigns, but the difference in tactics is quite similar and I thought it worth noting.  Some people will respond better to the blatant shock value of a repulsive image; others will need something more sobering and subtle in order to relate to the matter at hand.  As long as both are proven to be effective, they are valid methods of conveying a serious message and need to continue in order for the message to be received by the greatest number of people.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is somewhat of a tangent, but after I thought about the smoker&#8217;s lung poster, I recalled how desensitized I became to its message after seeing it so many times.  &#8220;Yes, yes &#8211; that&#8217;s gross, don&#8217;t smoke, whatever.&#8221;  And I went on to become a smoker because a cigarette a day was not going to turn my lungs into THAT.</p>
<p>Then I saw the PSA Yul Brenner filmed shortly before his death of lung cancer.  (Most have probably seen it, but if not:  <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JNjunlWUJJI" rel="nofollow">here</a>.)  As grossed out as I was as a kid looking at that poster, it had NOWHERE near the impact on me that Brenner&#8217;s words did when I first heard them in my 20s.</p>
<p>I know this isn&#8217;t a post about anti-smoking campaigns, but the difference in tactics is quite similar and I thought it worth noting.  Some people will respond better to the blatant shock value of a repulsive image; others will need something more sobering and subtle in order to relate to the matter at hand.  As long as both are proven to be effective, they are valid methods of conveying a serious message and need to continue in order for the message to be received by the greatest number of people.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katharine</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-7544</link>
		<dc:creator>Katharine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:14:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-7544</guid>
		<description>When I got the scary slideshow in high school, the message didn&#039;t seem to be &quot;don&#039;t sleep with someone whose junk looks like this&quot; - instead it was &quot;don&#039;t have [unprotected] sex or this could happen to you.&quot;  Perhaps this sounds like a hazy distinction, but all I know is that we left the classroom feeling anything but &quot;reassured.&quot;

Frankly, I&#039;m not too concerned about attaching a stigma to individuals with STDs through the use of such slideshows.  The same argument could be made against those ubiquitous posters of a smoker&#039;s lung, but those aren&#039;t going away any time soon.  

But even if those images are somewhat exploitative, it&#039;s more important to startle teens into smart behavior.  And unfortunately, I don&#039;t believe most teens would appreciate the message behind subtler images like the final one posted above.  I can hear my kid nephew scoffing, &quot;So what, am I supposed to act like EVERY girl I meet has an STD?&quot;  Well...yeah.

However, I do think that images of healthy-looking people rather than just a close-up of diseased genitalia have the potential to be very effective in reinforcing smart sex practices in adults.  They are probably more likely to brush off that memory of grotesque genitalia when it&#039;s a decade old and they are presented with a perfectly unblemished specimen.  So such a PSA campaign would be a sobering reminder and a new way to relate to what the Cavalcade of Venereal Disease first taught them in high school health class.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I got the scary slideshow in high school, the message didn&#8217;t seem to be &#8220;don&#8217;t sleep with someone whose junk looks like this&#8221; &#8211; instead it was &#8220;don&#8217;t have [unprotected] sex or this could happen to you.&#8221;  Perhaps this sounds like a hazy distinction, but all I know is that we left the classroom feeling anything but &#8220;reassured.&#8221;</p>
<p>Frankly, I&#8217;m not too concerned about attaching a stigma to individuals with STDs through the use of such slideshows.  The same argument could be made against those ubiquitous posters of a smoker&#8217;s lung, but those aren&#8217;t going away any time soon.  </p>
<p>But even if those images are somewhat exploitative, it&#8217;s more important to startle teens into smart behavior.  And unfortunately, I don&#8217;t believe most teens would appreciate the message behind subtler images like the final one posted above.  I can hear my kid nephew scoffing, &#8220;So what, am I supposed to act like EVERY girl I meet has an STD?&#8221;  Well&#8230;yeah.</p>
<p>However, I do think that images of healthy-looking people rather than just a close-up of diseased genitalia have the potential to be very effective in reinforcing smart sex practices in adults.  They are probably more likely to brush off that memory of grotesque genitalia when it&#8217;s a decade old and they are presented with a perfectly unblemished specimen.  So such a PSA campaign would be a sobering reminder and a new way to relate to what the Cavalcade of Venereal Disease first taught them in high school health class.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: adina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-7530</link>
		<dc:creator>adina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 17:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-7530</guid>
		<description>Sarah raises a good point. As a proponent of de-stigmatizing STDs, I&#039;ve devoted much of my professional career to this topic; I&#039;ve also been open about my cervical HPV infection and personal experiences with STD stigma. At the same time, I&#039;m an advocate for accurate sexual health education. This post focused on the later, but I agree that we must also push for a campaign that removes the moral and social stigma from those who are already infected.  Is it possible that showing attractive people with healthy-looking genitalia as being STD-infected is one step in weakening current STD stigma (which associate infections with being dirty, damaged, not-sexy)? An argument could be made that the &#039;scary&#039; slideshow images not only promote misunderstandings about STD risk but also reinforce negative stereotypes about those who are living with STDs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sarah raises a good point. As a proponent of de-stigmatizing STDs, I&#8217;ve devoted much of my professional career to this topic; I&#8217;ve also been open about my cervical HPV infection and personal experiences with STD stigma. At the same time, I&#8217;m an advocate for accurate sexual health education. This post focused on the later, but I agree that we must also push for a campaign that removes the moral and social stigma from those who are already infected.  Is it possible that showing attractive people with healthy-looking genitalia as being STD-infected is one step in weakening current STD stigma (which associate infections with being dirty, damaged, not-sexy)? An argument could be made that the &#8216;scary&#8217; slideshow images not only promote misunderstandings about STD risk but also reinforce negative stereotypes about those who are living with STDs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sarah</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/23/guest-post-representing-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comment-page-1/#comment-7522</link>
		<dc:creator>sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Feb 2009 07:02:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=7078#comment-7522</guid>
		<description>This is the whole other layer to what some call the HPV epidemic and the spread of genital herpes and that is the fact that most doctors don&#039;t test for HPV and herpes (and many will resist doing so) meaning most asymptomatic individuals have no idea they&#039;re infected. The stigma associated with these infections is often perceived to be more significant than the physical effects - odd when we consider the money that is poured into cervical screening. Creating an awareness campaign that doesn&#039;t further stigmatize those already infected is a huge challenge and something the above fails to do.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is the whole other layer to what some call the HPV epidemic and the spread of genital herpes and that is the fact that most doctors don&#8217;t test for HPV and herpes (and many will resist doing so) meaning most asymptomatic individuals have no idea they&#8217;re infected. The stigma associated with these infections is often perceived to be more significant than the physical effects &#8211; odd when we consider the money that is poured into cervical screening. Creating an awareness campaign that doesn&#8217;t further stigmatize those already infected is a huge challenge and something the above fails to do.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

