<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: My Cat Person/Dog Person Rant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:32:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Yrro Simyarin</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-564117</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Yrro Simyarin]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2012 18:19:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-564117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having worked in rescue, I can assure you that there are numerous &quot;crazy dog ladies.&quot;

Oddly enough, I&#039;ve met fewer &quot;crazy dog men.&quot; I&#039;m sure some exist, though.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having worked in rescue, I can assure you that there are numerous &#8220;crazy dog ladies.&#8221;</p>
<p>Oddly enough, I&#8217;ve met fewer &#8220;crazy dog men.&#8221; I&#8217;m sure some exist, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabethshum</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-562041</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Elizabethshum]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Oct 2012 18:28:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-562041</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You are misinformed. More people in america have cats than dogs as pets. Over 10 million more cats as pets than dogs. And in persia, cats are protected but dogs can be shot on site and are not welcomed. The issue is that yiu see more dogs with people cause dogs have to be walked and cats are inside with their owners as house cats never let outside. Just know the stats that the american pet is a cat not a dog. In a study, cat people were shown to be more intelligent and dog people more social. You just do not hear bookish cat people talking about cats much but they love them fiercly. Cats are totally in right now. Finally!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are misinformed. More people in america have cats than dogs as pets. Over 10 million more cats as pets than dogs. And in persia, cats are protected but dogs can be shot on site and are not welcomed. The issue is that yiu see more dogs with people cause dogs have to be walked and cats are inside with their owners as house cats never let outside. Just know the stats that the american pet is a cat not a dog. In a study, cat people were shown to be more intelligent and dog people more social. You just do not hear bookish cat people talking about cats much but they love them fiercly. Cats are totally in right now. Finally!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erin lynne</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-488693</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[erin lynne]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Apr 2011 22:03:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-488693</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;I mean, no one ever fears ending up a “crazy dog lady,” and it’s not just because of the lack of alliteration.&quot;

my mom asked me recently if i was going to become &quot;some crazy dog lady&quot;. she was also dead serious. so my mom fears that i might. but then again it just might be my mom....]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I mean, no one ever fears ending up a “crazy dog lady,” and it’s not just because of the lack of alliteration.&#8221;</p>
<p>my mom asked me recently if i was going to become &#8220;some crazy dog lady&#8221;. she was also dead serious. so my mom fears that i might. but then again it just might be my mom&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niczo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-462392</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Niczo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Mar 2011 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-462392</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Based on many comments that I find interesting as well as my own notions (excluding those which to me appear as personal bias), I will attempt a broad generalization, that certainly for all practical intents and purposes is completely useless but still perhaps interesting.

A &quot;dog person&quot; I would assume adhere strongly to the principle of social hierarchy in both personal, spiritual and political matters. Someone is big and strong in terms of physical force, therefore he/she dictates terms. Someone is smart, popular, has alot of money, is spiritually enlightened, therefore he or she is the natural leader of your social group.

A &quot;cat person&quot; I imagine to be more independantly minded. Such individuals form social groups not around hierarchy but rather careful selection. They still derive their confidence and self-image from social acceptance, this is inevitable since humans are flock animals. What differentiates them is how they seek that acceptance. They are more likely to actively seek out like-minded individuals rather than attempt to conform to or dictate already established intellectual or political norms.

Please tell me if this makes any sense, otherwise I wont know whether or not I have failed miserably.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Based on many comments that I find interesting as well as my own notions (excluding those which to me appear as personal bias), I will attempt a broad generalization, that certainly for all practical intents and purposes is completely useless but still perhaps interesting.</p>
<p>A &#8220;dog person&#8221; I would assume adhere strongly to the principle of social hierarchy in both personal, spiritual and political matters. Someone is big and strong in terms of physical force, therefore he/she dictates terms. Someone is smart, popular, has alot of money, is spiritually enlightened, therefore he or she is the natural leader of your social group.</p>
<p>A &#8220;cat person&#8221; I imagine to be more independantly minded. Such individuals form social groups not around hierarchy but rather careful selection. They still derive their confidence and self-image from social acceptance, this is inevitable since humans are flock animals. What differentiates them is how they seek that acceptance. They are more likely to actively seek out like-minded individuals rather than attempt to conform to or dictate already established intellectual or political norms.</p>
<p>Please tell me if this makes any sense, otherwise I wont know whether or not I have failed miserably.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kathy</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-454647</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kathy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Feb 2011 23:46:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-454647</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When I ask if someone is a cat or a dog person I ask because I&#039;m hoping they aren&#039;t allergic to my cats. It&#039;s not about whether or not they are masculine or feminine.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When I ask if someone is a cat or a dog person I ask because I&#8217;m hoping they aren&#8217;t allergic to my cats. It&#8217;s not about whether or not they are masculine or feminine.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-453052</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Feb 2011 11:29:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-453052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i think it is surprising that someone who studies gender would miss the cat=femininity meme--its  really long one, particularly in European history/folklore etc. Cats have long represented both the &quot;good&quot; and &quot;bad&quot; of femininity--everything from sleek sexiness, to viciousness, to fickleness, magic/witchcraft, manipulative etc. Its not a coincidence that many nicknames/vulgar names for female genetically are also names for &quot;cat.&quot; Its kind of hard to read &quot;too much&quot; into that, in my opinion.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think it is surprising that someone who studies gender would miss the cat=femininity meme&#8211;its  really long one, particularly in European history/folklore etc. Cats have long represented both the &#8220;good&#8221; and &#8220;bad&#8221; of femininity&#8211;everything from sleek sexiness, to viciousness, to fickleness, magic/witchcraft, manipulative etc. Its not a coincidence that many nicknames/vulgar names for female genetically are also names for &#8220;cat.&#8221; Its kind of hard to read &#8220;too much&#8221; into that, in my opinion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ema</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-451512</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ema]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:07:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-451512</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I like all animals... I have a cat, a dog, birds and fish... So what does that make me?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like all animals&#8230; I have a cat, a dog, birds and fish&#8230; So what does that make me?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACK</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-407470</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JACK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-407470</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[HEY THAT WAS A JOKE................I LOVE MY CATS  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HEY THAT WAS A JOKE&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.I LOVE MY CATS  !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JACK</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-407468</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[JACK]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Nov 2010 15:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-407468</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I find when going on vacation, i place my cats in the freezer.......when i return, usally a week or two later, i put the now frozen cats in the microwave .....I find if you use the  &#039;&#039;defrost&#039;&#039; button then you use full power.[remember all microwaves varie in power. ]  THE CATS REVIVE WITHIN A 2 MIN. TIME FRAME. I HOPE THIS WAS HELPFUL..........   :]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find when going on vacation, i place my cats in the freezer&#8230;&#8230;.when i return, usally a week or two later, i put the now frozen cats in the microwave &#8230;..I find if you use the  &#8221;defrost&#8221; button then you use full power.[remember all microwaves varie in power. ]  THE CATS REVIVE WITHIN A 2 MIN. TIME FRAME. I HOPE THIS WAS HELPFUL&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.   :]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-374978</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Patrick]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 2010 04:01:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-374978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think the sense in which we think of dog = masculine and cat = feminine is dated, probably to a time when dogs were primarily work animals or hunting companions, which were male-dominated sectors. It is only a recent development that dogs are commonly household pets without ties to these other activities. I think some of the divide in opinion here reflects how we think of the animals, in terms of their current social context or in past social contexts. In the current context I don&#039;t believe we can default dogs as masculine.

As far as the linguistic argument goes, it should be handled cautiously. It may be a linguistic remnant of a past cultural dichotomy, and that dichotomy may not hold the associations we would give it. In the case of dog and bitch, we have two terms for the animal, one with a more specific use than the other. The first does not necessarily need to be exclusionary -- in the every day life of a Saxon, you can hunt with a female dog just as well as with a male. But only a bitch can raise the whelps.(Why the term dog persisted at all is unknown to me. The more common OE term for a dog was the root for our present &quot;hound.&quot;)

As for cats, there is also a name for female cats:

    b. The male or he-cat (formerly also boar-cat, ram-cat) is now colloquially called tom-cat (see TOM); formerly and still in north Engl. and Sc. gib-cat (see GIB); the female or she-cat was formerly also doe-cat.

My guess is that the only reason tom-cat persists at all is because of the derogatory slang term for a womanizing man derived from it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the sense in which we think of dog = masculine and cat = feminine is dated, probably to a time when dogs were primarily work animals or hunting companions, which were male-dominated sectors. It is only a recent development that dogs are commonly household pets without ties to these other activities. I think some of the divide in opinion here reflects how we think of the animals, in terms of their current social context or in past social contexts. In the current context I don&#8217;t believe we can default dogs as masculine.</p>
<p>As far as the linguistic argument goes, it should be handled cautiously. It may be a linguistic remnant of a past cultural dichotomy, and that dichotomy may not hold the associations we would give it. In the case of dog and bitch, we have two terms for the animal, one with a more specific use than the other. The first does not necessarily need to be exclusionary &#8212; in the every day life of a Saxon, you can hunt with a female dog just as well as with a male. But only a bitch can raise the whelps.(Why the term dog persisted at all is unknown to me. The more common OE term for a dog was the root for our present &#8220;hound.&#8221;)</p>
<p>As for cats, there is also a name for female cats:</p>
<p>    b. The male or he-cat (formerly also boar-cat, ram-cat) is now colloquially called tom-cat (see TOM); formerly and still in north Engl. and Sc. gib-cat (see GIB); the female or she-cat was formerly also doe-cat.</p>
<p>My guess is that the only reason tom-cat persists at all is because of the derogatory slang term for a womanizing man derived from it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-374143</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-374143</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Also... I had a boyfriend in highschool who was most definitely neither a cat person nor a dog person but a gerbil person. What does that say about his gender performance, sexuality, etc? (lol)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also&#8230; I had a boyfriend in highschool who was most definitely neither a cat person nor a dog person but a gerbil person. What does that say about his gender performance, sexuality, etc? (lol)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-374141</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Sep 2010 01:10:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-374141</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whether it extends to the masculinity or femininity of the human &quot;owner,&quot; I think even as adults, there is a sense that dogs are essentially masculine, cats essentially feminine. I tend to assume a cat is female unless I know otherwise, and that a dog is male unless I know otherwise. 

This even shows in our (English) language: which sex is the default, and which is the sex that we must mark to make the point that it&#039;s different? Language-wise, the default for cats is female, the marked state is male (TOM cat); the default state for dogs is male, the marked state is female (bitch in the original sense of the word.)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whether it extends to the masculinity or femininity of the human &#8220;owner,&#8221; I think even as adults, there is a sense that dogs are essentially masculine, cats essentially feminine. I tend to assume a cat is female unless I know otherwise, and that a dog is male unless I know otherwise. </p>
<p>This even shows in our (English) language: which sex is the default, and which is the sex that we must mark to make the point that it&#8217;s different? Language-wise, the default for cats is female, the marked state is male (TOM cat); the default state for dogs is male, the marked state is female (bitch in the original sense of the word.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sightergoliant</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-290811</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[sightergoliant]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 06:17:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-290811</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You&#039;re totally right!  Homeward Bound was one of my favorite movies growing up, and it totally had me thinking that cats were girls and dogs were boys!  I still have trouble with it, my boyfriend has two boy cats and I&#039;m constantly referring to them with feminine pronouns just because I can&#039;t shake that default assumption.

But then again...there&#039;s some counterexamples too.  Lassie.  Garfield.  Heathcliff.  And I always assumed Marmaduke was a girl dog?  Was that right?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re totally right!  Homeward Bound was one of my favorite movies growing up, and it totally had me thinking that cats were girls and dogs were boys!  I still have trouble with it, my boyfriend has two boy cats and I&#8217;m constantly referring to them with feminine pronouns just because I can&#8217;t shake that default assumption.</p>
<p>But then again&#8230;there&#8217;s some counterexamples too.  Lassie.  Garfield.  Heathcliff.  And I always assumed Marmaduke was a girl dog?  Was that right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chen</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-290796</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chen]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 05:16:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-290796</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maybe it&#039;s an American thing, then. Because it&#039;s really something that doesn&#039;t exist here. People go up to women and still expect them to love dogs best, not to suddenly adore cats because they&#039;re women.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe it&#8217;s an American thing, then. Because it&#8217;s really something that doesn&#8217;t exist here. People go up to women and still expect them to love dogs best, not to suddenly adore cats because they&#8217;re women.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fantine</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/02/16/my-cat-persondog-person-rant/comment-page-2/#comment-290720</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fantine]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 00:29:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6815#comment-290720</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There&#039;s nothing &quot;general&quot; about that assumption--it&#039;s just your own bias speaking.  Millions of people worldwide love cats; otherwise the question (cat person/dog person) and the related gender assumptions would not exist.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There&#8217;s nothing &#8220;general&#8221; about that assumption&#8211;it&#8217;s just your own bias speaking.  Millions of people worldwide love cats; otherwise the question (cat person/dog person) and the related gender assumptions would not exist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
