<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refining Fine Art</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: thistle</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-107596</link>
		<dc:creator>thistle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 16:45:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-107596</guid>
		<description>why do people like this find so much enjoyment in stalking sites like this and leaving juvenile messages? Though I suppose it does further some of the points made on this site...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why do people like this find so much enjoyment in stalking sites like this and leaving juvenile messages? Though I suppose it does further some of the points made on this site&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: e.</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-7251</link>
		<dc:creator>e.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 18:25:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-7251</guid>
		<description>mh. i think just because its &quot;classical&quot; and they had their ideals, that does not mean theyre the best. i mean, what would you say in maybe a hundred years if you came across some picture of a model from our time?

its really icky, yes, but why exactly is it their fault?
i mean, it IS a modern interpretation, and it probably suits a lot of people. as much as i dislike it i find it difficult to entirely discard it as &quot;distasteful, stamp on it, archive and gone with it.&quot;

(though from the pure feeling i wholeheartedly agree with the first post ;))</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>mh. i think just because its &#8220;classical&#8221; and they had their ideals, that does not mean theyre the best. i mean, what would you say in maybe a hundred years if you came across some picture of a model from our time?</p>
<p>its really icky, yes, but why exactly is it their fault?<br />
i mean, it IS a modern interpretation, and it probably suits a lot of people. as much as i dislike it i find it difficult to entirely discard it as &#8220;distasteful, stamp on it, archive and gone with it.&#8221;</p>
<p>(though from the pure feeling i wholeheartedly agree with the first post ;))</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ccc</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6997</link>
		<dc:creator>ccc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6997</guid>
		<description>I think they look great!  Much better than the fatties next to them.  Seriously, which one would you rather poke?  Ya buncha pseudo-enlightened d-bags!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they look great!  Much better than the fatties next to them.  Seriously, which one would you rather poke?  Ya buncha pseudo-enlightened d-bags!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Honey</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6988</link>
		<dc:creator>Honey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 02:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6988</guid>
		<description>Great, now venus looks like a porn star.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great, now venus looks like a porn star.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: LoveDog</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6950</link>
		<dc:creator>LoveDog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Feb 2009 06:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6950</guid>
		<description>whoa, super creepy! Proportion goes where now?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>whoa, super creepy! Proportion goes where now?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Zece</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6834</link>
		<dc:creator>Zece</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 21:55:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6834</guid>
		<description>I am so offended by this. Really, how DARE these people violate these beautiful and classic works of art! These pieces of art are thousands of years old, and have survived war, famine, and time; they are perfect the way they are. To change these statues into not only the &quot;picturesque&quot; woman in today&#039;s American society (which is total and utter bullshit, excuse my French), but to think that this museum has the RIGHT to do so is insulting and demeaning. How DARE you, Thorwaldsen Museum in Copenhagen. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am so offended by this. Really, how DARE these people violate these beautiful and classic works of art! These pieces of art are thousands of years old, and have survived war, famine, and time; they are perfect the way they are. To change these statues into not only the &#8220;picturesque&#8221; woman in today&#8217;s American society (which is total and utter bullshit, excuse my French), but to think that this museum has the RIGHT to do so is insulting and demeaning. How DARE you, Thorwaldsen Museum in Copenhagen. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Linkage &#171; Marjorie Rodrigues</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6819</link>
		<dc:creator>Linkage &#171; Marjorie Rodrigues</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 13:34:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6819</guid>
		<description>[...] o padrão de beleza, ele fica mais severo &#8212; porque o lance é justamente ser inatingível). E sobre o quanto esta magreza é desproporcional. - Sobre salto alto, sobre cosméticos e sobre como todo mundo está no balaio do patriarcado  (em [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] o padrão de beleza, ele fica mais severo &#8212; porque o lance é justamente ser inatingível). E sobre o quanto esta magreza é desproporcional. &#8211; Sobre salto alto, sobre cosméticos e sobre como todo mundo está no balaio do patriarcado  (em [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Links &#171; Stuff</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6781</link>
		<dc:creator>Links &#171; Stuff</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 09:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6781</guid>
		<description>[...] Related to that: The Thorwaldsen Museum in Copenhagen sells &#8220;amended&#8221; sculptures. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Related to that: The Thorwaldsen Museum in Copenhagen sells &#8220;amended&#8221; sculptures. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypatia</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6774</link>
		<dc:creator>hypatia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 05:22:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6774</guid>
		<description>I fail to see how shaving 45 pounds off these women in an &quot;artistic interpretation&quot; it&#039;s just a skinny interpretation.

It is bad that I&#039;m thinking &quot;At least they didn&#039;t give them pornstar breasts&quot;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I fail to see how shaving 45 pounds off these women in an &#8220;artistic interpretation&#8221; it&#8217;s just a skinny interpretation.</p>
<p>It is bad that I&#8217;m thinking &#8220;At least they didn&#8217;t give them pornstar breasts&#8221;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Will</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6770</link>
		<dc:creator>Will</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 02:24:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6770</guid>
		<description>This is just plain awful.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is just plain awful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joeline</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6765</link>
		<dc:creator>Joeline</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:52:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6765</guid>
		<description>I agree very much with everything you guys have said.  The Human body is a work of art in itself no matter the size or age.  Venus is a representation of the female form in her natural HEALTHY state and more so is a work of highly recognised and appreciated art.  To create replica&#039;s which not only alter this state, but INSULT IT by ignoring the ideals which it was representing is horrifying, especially since it was a well known Museum which did so (and they should have known better!!)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree very much with everything you guys have said.  The Human body is a work of art in itself no matter the size or age.  Venus is a representation of the female form in her natural HEALTHY state and more so is a work of highly recognised and appreciated art.  To create replica&#8217;s which not only alter this state, but INSULT IT by ignoring the ideals which it was representing is horrifying, especially since it was a well known Museum which did so (and they should have known better!!)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6678</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 19:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6678</guid>
		<description>HA!  It&#039;s cause all the fine art students now a days are watching to much Anime!  God those are awful!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HA!  It&#8217;s cause all the fine art students now a days are watching to much Anime!  God those are awful!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tina</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6675</link>
		<dc:creator>tina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 18:56:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6675</guid>
		<description>she&#039;s got a lollipop head now. it&#039;s too big for her body. 


as is usual with anorexics! go figure!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>she&#8217;s got a lollipop head now. it&#8217;s too big for her body. </p>
<p>as is usual with anorexics! go figure!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sunnyhello</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6672</link>
		<dc:creator>sunnyhello</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 16:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6672</guid>
		<description>I know she&#039;s a goddess and all, but how does Venus breathe and stand upright without any ribs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know she&#8217;s a goddess and all, but how does Venus breathe and stand upright without any ribs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Two-Headed Blog &#187; My New Favorite Blogs</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/30/refining-fine-art/comment-page-1/#comment-6666</link>
		<dc:creator>Two-Headed Blog &#187; My New Favorite Blogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Feb 2009 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6228#comment-6666</guid>
		<description>[...] This post, in particular, got my blood boiling. Apparently, some folks at the Thorvaldsen Museum in Copenhagen got together and decided that classics like The Birth of Venus or Venus with the Apple just weren&#8217;t good enough the way they were - nope, that Venus bitch needed to lose some of the weight. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post, in particular, got my blood boiling. Apparently, some folks at the Thorvaldsen Museum in Copenhagen got together and decided that classics like The Birth of Venus or Venus with the Apple just weren&#8217;t good enough the way they were - nope, that Venus bitch needed to lose some of the weight. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

