<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Advertising with Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 10:55:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Yes oui kan &#171; alfanje</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-60223</link>
		<dc:creator>Yes oui kan &#171; alfanje</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2009 22:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-60223</guid>
		<description>[...] son un poco de ficción científica, pero en general está interesantillo. Hoy había un post sobre la utilización de Obama en la publicidad. Me ha llamado la atención la imagen que pongo aquí arriba, que segun dicen es publicidad de una [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] son un poco de ficción científica, pero en general está interesantillo. Hoy había un post sobre la utilización de Obama en la publicidad. Me ha llamado la atención la imagen que pongo aquí arriba, que segun dicen es publicidad de una [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; MARKETING WITH MULTICULTURALISM</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-11632</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; MARKETING WITH MULTICULTURALISM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-11632</guid>
		<description>[...] Indeed. We&#8217;ve featured a few other examples of this related to race: this set of ads that associate people of color with &#8220;progress&#8221; and related ideas, this set that associates the product with racial tolerance and harmony, and, arguably, this ad for Skittles and these ads co-opting Obama&#8217;s election.  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Indeed. We&#8217;ve featured a few other examples of this related to race: this set of ads that associate people of color with &#8220;progress&#8221; and related ideas, this set that associates the product with racial tolerance and harmony, and, arguably, this ad for Skittles and these ads co-opting Obama&#8217;s election.  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bud American Ale &#171; Collection 101: Obamappropriation</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7408</link>
		<dc:creator>Bud American Ale &#171; Collection 101: Obamappropriation</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 00:23:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-7408</guid>
		<description>[...] via sociologicalimages [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] via sociologicalimages [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; ADVERTISING AGAINST BUSH</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-7052</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; ADVERTISING AGAINST BUSH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 07:00:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-7052</guid>
		<description>[...] some companies are capitalizing on Obama&#8217;s election, others are using the end of Bush&#8217;s presidency in [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] some companies are capitalizing on Obama&#8217;s election, others are using the end of Bush&#8217;s presidency in [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; THIS HISTORIC PRESIDENCY, BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6775</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; THIS HISTORIC PRESIDENCY, BROUGHT TO YOU BY THE PRO-LIFE MOVEMENT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 07:00:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6775</guid>
		<description>[...] recently posted about advertising that capitalized on Obama&#8217;s popularity.  Here we have a non-profit called CatholicVote doing the same.  NBC reportedly refused to air it [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] recently posted about advertising that capitalized on Obama&#8217;s popularity.  Here we have a non-profit called CatholicVote doing the same.  NBC reportedly refused to air it [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SociologicalMe</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6396</link>
		<dc:creator>SociologicalMe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 18:06:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6396</guid>
		<description>This is officially the first time I&#039;ve ever wondered if a Chia pet was making a racist reference to hairstyles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is officially the first time I&#8217;ve ever wondered if a Chia pet was making a racist reference to hairstyles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: grady</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6283</link>
		<dc:creator>grady</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 06:54:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6283</guid>
		<description>I was at the innuageration. People had pepsi hats, tshirts, scarves, everything really, with the pepsi/obama tie in. (&quot;Hope&quot; with the &quot;O&quot; as the new pepsi symbol.) I was looking for a promotions tent. I wasn&#039;t sure if people were actually buying these items or getting them free. I never found out, does anyone know?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was at the innuageration. People had pepsi hats, tshirts, scarves, everything really, with the pepsi/obama tie in. (&#8220;Hope&#8221; with the &#8220;O&#8221; as the new pepsi symbol.) I was looking for a promotions tent. I wasn&#8217;t sure if people were actually buying these items or getting them free. I never found out, does anyone know?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Interrobang</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6238</link>
		<dc:creator>Interrobang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:54:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6238</guid>
		<description>That Berlitz ad made me literally roar, but I didn&#039;t need to see Dubi&#039;s explanation to get it. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That Berlitz ad made me literally roar, but I didn&#8217;t need to see Dubi&#8217;s explanation to get it. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deb G.</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6228</link>
		<dc:creator>Deb G.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:57:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6228</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know if you&#039;ve seen &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=80c_1232506036&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;this piece about a mask factory in Japan?&lt;/a&gt;  The concept of the mask, and wearing the mask to do business, seems to put Obama into a very iconic category.  (BTW, I don&#039;t think the masks look that much like him...but what can we expect for roughly US$20?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know if you&#8217;ve seen <a href="http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=80c_1232506036" rel="nofollow">this piece about a mask factory in Japan?</a>  The concept of the mask, and wearing the mask to do business, seems to put Obama into a very iconic category.  (BTW, I don&#8217;t think the masks look that much like him&#8230;but what can we expect for roughly US$20?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: links for 2009-01-21 &#171; Embololalia</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6227</link>
		<dc:creator>links for 2009-01-21 &#171; Embololalia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:03:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6227</guid>
		<description>[...] ADVERTISING WITH OBAMA Like many of the “feminist” ads, these ads seem to be genuinely celebrating Obama’s election. Do they? Or do they trivialize everything he claim to stand for and the difficult road ahead for both him and the country? Something in between? Something else entirely? (tags: barackobama advertising business appropriation) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] ADVERTISING WITH OBAMA Like many of the “feminist” ads, these ads seem to be genuinely celebrating Obama’s election. Do they? Or do they trivialize everything he claim to stand for and the difficult road ahead for both him and the country? Something in between? Something else entirely? (tags: barackobama advertising business appropriation) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SAM</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6226</link>
		<dc:creator>SAM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:00:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6226</guid>
		<description>I think the Pepsi ad is great.  I don&#039;t know who these people are who want to make and submit videos, but I know they exist, and they are happy to use whatever platform they can find.  The celebs are entertaining.  And the Pepsi connection at the end is perfect -- restrained, but just enough to draft behind Obama&#039;s star.

Actually, now that I look at them again, I like them all.  They&#039;re very effective at polishing their brand image.  I suppose it may depend on whether you feel that they are trying to manipulate you, or that you are a sophisticated consumer of marketing who knows how the game is played.  Isn&#039;t that a generational difference?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the Pepsi ad is great.  I don&#8217;t know who these people are who want to make and submit videos, but I know they exist, and they are happy to use whatever platform they can find.  The celebs are entertaining.  And the Pepsi connection at the end is perfect &#8212; restrained, but just enough to draft behind Obama&#8217;s star.</p>
<p>Actually, now that I look at them again, I like them all.  They&#8217;re very effective at polishing their brand image.  I suppose it may depend on whether you feel that they are trying to manipulate you, or that you are a sophisticated consumer of marketing who knows how the game is played.  Isn&#8217;t that a generational difference?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Robin B</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6213</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:23:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6213</guid>
		<description>Ligne Roset, a (furniture?) design firm, has been running ads that say &quot;embrace change&quot; and &quot;a modern administration deserves modern design.&quot;  I&#039;ve seen them on wonkette.com, a political site.

Also, this one, from the coal industry, is a little different: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_5N8johJeM, but it not only uses Obama&#039;s discussion of &quot;clean coal&quot; to sell it but also capitalizes on the the &quot;yes we can&quot; language.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ligne Roset, a (furniture?) design firm, has been running ads that say &#8220;embrace change&#8221; and &#8220;a modern administration deserves modern design.&#8221;  I&#8217;ve seen them on wonkette.com, a political site.</p>
<p>Also, this one, from the coal industry, is a little different: <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_5N8johJeM" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S_5N8johJeM</a>, but it not only uses Obama&#8217;s discussion of &#8220;clean coal&#8221; to sell it but also capitalizes on the the &#8220;yes we can&#8221; language.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: macon d</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6212</link>
		<dc:creator>macon d</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6212</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re crass. For me, such ads tarnish whatever they&#039;re hawking. Malodorous, desperate grabs for attention.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re crass. For me, such ads tarnish whatever they&#8217;re hawking. Malodorous, desperate grabs for attention.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dubi</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2009/01/20/advertising-with-obama/comment-page-1/#comment-6210</link>
		<dc:creator>Dubi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=6050#comment-6210</guid>
		<description>A. A word of explanation about the Israeli one: the third line is in Hebrew letters, it&#039;s the Hebrew word for &quot;yes&quot;, which is pronounced &quot;ken&quot; (that&#039;s the closest Hebrew gets to &quot;can&quot;). Just so you know.

B. One of the parties running in the current electoral campaign in Israel has chosen the innovative slogan &quot;yes we can&quot; (in Hebrew, of course) as its campaign slogan. Interestingly, the party is Shas, an ultra-orthodox, traditionalist party whose explicit goal is to turn Israel into a theocracy. Fun fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A. A word of explanation about the Israeli one: the third line is in Hebrew letters, it&#8217;s the Hebrew word for &#8220;yes&#8221;, which is pronounced &#8220;ken&#8221; (that&#8217;s the closest Hebrew gets to &#8220;can&#8221;). Just so you know.</p>
<p>B. One of the parties running in the current electoral campaign in Israel has chosen the innovative slogan &#8220;yes we can&#8221; (in Hebrew, of course) as its campaign slogan. Interestingly, the party is Shas, an ultra-orthodox, traditionalist party whose explicit goal is to turn Israel into a theocracy. Fun fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

