Comments on: Portraying Age in Vogue

By: When I’m Sixty-Four « I’ll Follow the Sun

When I’m Sixty-Four « I’ll Follow the Sun — Thu, 12 Mar 2009 06:29:15 +0000

[...] [See better quality scans on Sociological Images] [...]

By: Dubi

Dubi — Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:36:17 +0000

Bagelsan – on the contrary cropping the picture so low while still not showing any sign of cleavage is done precisely to desexualize her – making it seem as if the model is prepubescent. Maybe 10 is a bit borderline, but certainly at age 6-7 shirtlessness for girls is considered non-problematic where I’m from.

Also – how can you say the 40 picture is toning it down? Her jacket is completely open with no blouse…

By: Bagelsan

Bagelsan — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:46:17 +0000

Nudity =/= sexuality.

…except that, often, nudity DOES equal sexuality, and they chose that ambiguity for the *underaged* one. Why can’t she have a shirt? Is naked the usual state for 10 year old girls? Also, cropping the photo so low on her chest is pretty suggestive that the sexuality was intended.

By: Eleanor

Eleanor — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 06:10:54 +0000

Altairian – what’s creepy about the nude poses? Nudity =/= sexuality. Nothing about the model or the poses is sexual to me at all.

By: altairian

altairian — Fri, 09 Jan 2009 00:19:43 +0000

It seems like a few of the commenters missed the point? They were not trying to ACTUALLY make her look 30-40-50-60, but simply to TREAT her as if she was, which makes it an interesting comment on what is “acceptable” for different ages of women when it comes to clothing/hair/make-up/behavior (though the pose).

It’s very creepy to me that the nude ones are the 10 and 20 year old pose.

I agree that I don’t really get what’s going on in the 30 picture — but I also can see how that is often how that age of women are often portrayed. They’re “too old” to photograph nude and “mature” enough to wear that much makeup, so they glitz them up way beyond what is necessary. By 40, it’s time to tone things down and take a backseat to the naked 20 year olds and dramatically glamorous 30 year olds.

Unrelated, I recently discovered this blog and can’t get enough. :)

By: Caravelle

Caravelle — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 21:58:20 +0000

More specifically, the ads say NO to cosmetic surgery but YES to cosmetic products. If you hadn’t said it came from Vogue I would have assumed it’s an ad for l’Oréal.

As for the pictures… I find the lack of wrinkles in the three last ones a bit disturbing. In particular, like others I don’t see what says “30″ about the “30″ picture, and the age difference between the 40 and 50 ones is so subtle I almost don’t see it. Thank goodness for the gray hair and humongous ring on the 60 year-old or I’d say the same thing about her.

Anyway, the reaction I imagine to those pictures from anybody over 30 is “heck, NO cream or skin care will make me look like THAT ! Screw it, I’m having surgery”. Or something.

By: Jasmine

Jasmine — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:27:03 +0000

Dubi: I think it looks like the age 50 and 60 pictures involve surgical intervention because the model IS young. I imagine it would be difficult to make realistic wrinkles through makeup (without serious use of Halloween-type latex). I do agree that the 30-year-old picture doesn’t seem to make a lot of sense. She’s so heavily made up and looks almost drugged.

By: Dubi

Dubi — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 18:17:05 +0000

I don’t speak French, and Jay says that the magazine is taking a stand against surgical intervention, but it certainly DOES look like face-lifting and whatnot has been taking place for that latter ages. On the bright(?) side, at least they’re not showing a gradual decline in the attractiveness of the woman. If anything, the low-point seems to be at age 30 – why does she look so jaded and tired at 30? Is it the career? Kids? And is 30 really the age women start using botox? That sounds… stupid.

By: Alexis

Alexis — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 16:40:52 +0000

I saw this a while back and thought it was great.

By: Jay Livingston

Jay Livingston — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:18:36 +0000

Note that at every age, the magazine says “non” to surgical interventions.

By: mordicai

mordicai — Thu, 08 Jan 2009 12:37:31 +0000

http://hautemacabre.wordpress.com/?p=915

No, no, it isn’t NAILPOLISH it is MAN GLAZE.