<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Replacing Women</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/20/replacing-women/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/20/replacing-women/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarah</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/20/replacing-women/comment-page-1/#comment-161577</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 07:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=4280#comment-161577</guid>
		<description>I find this especially interesting because I&#039;m reading it in conjunction with your article on washing machine ads claiming to be liberating for women. I had started bubbling up an argument about how having a washing machine makes it unnecessary to have a laundress as a servant - and I think this article links right in with that. Technology is replacing human labor in a way that is simultaneously good and bad for both the economy and for societal treatment of the people who traditionally perform that labor.

I love when you post these vintage ads, by the way - looking at things from a historical standpoint tends to mitigate the outrage that commenteers seem to feel about contemporary ads, and allows for a more removed intellectual and economic evaluation of the ideas behind the ads.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I find this especially interesting because I&#8217;m reading it in conjunction with your article on washing machine ads claiming to be liberating for women. I had started bubbling up an argument about how having a washing machine makes it unnecessary to have a laundress as a servant &#8211; and I think this article links right in with that. Technology is replacing human labor in a way that is simultaneously good and bad for both the economy and for societal treatment of the people who traditionally perform that labor.</p>
<p>I love when you post these vintage ads, by the way &#8211; looking at things from a historical standpoint tends to mitigate the outrage that commenteers seem to feel about contemporary ads, and allows for a more removed intellectual and economic evaluation of the ideas behind the ads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Of Housework And Husbands &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/20/replacing-women/comment-page-1/#comment-151011</link>
		<dc:creator>Of Housework And Husbands &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:14:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=4280#comment-151011</guid>
		<description>[...] of the social construction of housework: husbands &#8220;help&#8221; wives by buying machines, gadgets replace slaves, feminism by [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of the social construction of housework: husbands &#8220;help&#8221; wives by buying machines, gadgets replace slaves, feminism by [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

