<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: I Guess Human Rights Abuses are no Match for Cleavage</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 04:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: YourName</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-552579</link>
		<dc:creator>YourName</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 May 2012 08:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-552579</guid>
		<description>Sorry for commenting so late, but bisexuality among women is considered to be sexy, as you Lisa have pointed. Maybe though the sexualization of Tila, they didn&#039;t want to make it to much, just because lesbianism isn&#039;t considered normal, but pornographical. Also as it is mentioned on some of the comments, the girls as allowed to gaze and they want to take part in Tila&#039;s striptease as much as the boys, so I definitely think that there is a suggestion of female bisexuality/lesbianism here. </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry for commenting so late, but bisexuality among women is considered to be sexy, as you Lisa have pointed. Maybe though the sexualization of Tila, they didn&#8217;t want to make it to much, just because lesbianism isn&#8217;t considered normal, but pornographical. Also as it is mentioned on some of the comments, the girls as allowed to gaze and they want to take part in Tila&#8217;s striptease as much as the boys, so I definitely think that there is a suggestion of female bisexuality/lesbianism here. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BE SMOKEFREE AND GET HOT CHICKS &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-151050</link>
		<dc:creator>BE SMOKEFREE AND GET HOT CHICKS &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Nov 2009 09:49:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-151050</guid>
		<description>[...] other examples of using sex, go here, here, and here. Or go to our &#8220;More&#8221; tab, where you&#8217;ll find a search box, and search [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] other examples of using sex, go here, here, and here. Or go to our &#8220;More&#8221; tab, where you&#8217;ll find a search box, and search [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Using Sex To Sell The Most Unlikely Things &#187; Sociological Images</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-102659</link>
		<dc:creator>Using Sex To Sell The Most Unlikely Things &#187; Sociological Images</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Aug 2009 10:38:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-102659</guid>
		<description>[...] See also similar posts on PETA (see here and here) and human rights violations in Burma. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] See also similar posts on PETA (see here and here) and human rights violations in Burma. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: G. Smith</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4415</link>
		<dc:creator>G. Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Nov 2008 18:42:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4415</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not saying what was done here was right, but how do you get people&#039;s attention in a society that has for the past fifty years been focused on self? We live in a consumer society in which the needs and desires of the individual have superseded all else, which has lead to a hardening of the individual conscious as well as a desensitizing of violence committed toward humans. In this environment how do you capture the minds and wills of a collective, there is two ways - You some how shock the audience (perhaps airing the rape of a real child by a dozen men of t.v), further desensitizing society to violence, or you use sex and appeal to the consumer side of society, further exacerbating the self centered obsession. I understand the conflict represented here and quite frankly I think they chose the more tasteful approach. Children being hurt, while a fact in conflict zones, should never be exploited for any reason. Although that might be needed to get people to do something.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not saying what was done here was right, but how do you get people&#8217;s attention in a society that has for the past fifty years been focused on self? We live in a consumer society in which the needs and desires of the individual have superseded all else, which has lead to a hardening of the individual conscious as well as a desensitizing of violence committed toward humans. In this environment how do you capture the minds and wills of a collective, there is two ways &#8211; You some how shock the audience (perhaps airing the rape of a real child by a dozen men of t.v), further desensitizing society to violence, or you use sex and appeal to the consumer side of society, further exacerbating the self centered obsession. I understand the conflict represented here and quite frankly I think they chose the more tasteful approach. Children being hurt, while a fact in conflict zones, should never be exploited for any reason. Although that might be needed to get people to do something.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dominika</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4078</link>
		<dc:creator>dominika</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Nov 2008 01:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4078</guid>
		<description>this is awful, and trivializing Burma</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is awful, and trivializing Burma</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Le</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4064</link>
		<dc:creator>Le</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 23:04:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4064</guid>
		<description>Yeah I thought girl-on-girl action is usually portrayed as sexually favorable. But either way of course this doesn&#039;t help the cause!!! As the first replier said, just plain laughable!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah I thought girl-on-girl action is usually portrayed as sexually favorable. But either way of course this doesn&#8217;t help the cause!!! As the first replier said, just plain laughable!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The bisexuality of Tila Tequila &#171; Café Americano</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4062</link>
		<dc:creator>The bisexuality of Tila Tequila &#171; Café Americano</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 15:32:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4062</guid>
		<description>[...] a side note: I sent in a PSA for human rights in Burma (starring Tila Tequila) to Sociological Images, a blog whose insistent media watch I appreciate. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a side note: I sent in a PSA for human rights in Burma (starring Tila Tequila) to Sociological Images, a blog whose insistent media watch I appreciate. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adriana</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4060</link>
		<dc:creator>Adriana</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 11:50:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4060</guid>
		<description>To clarify, a student showed this ad as part of a presentation on Tila Tequila and the media representation of bisexuality. I found this ad appalling for the reasons that everyone mentions. Fifa puts it well: we&#039;re rewarding idealism and world knowledge with porn?!?

Focusing on the bisexuality, I found it oddly skewed. Tila Tequila *touches* the men but only allows the women to *gaze*. So, yes, there is a shift in that Tila is the focus of the male *and* female gaze, but I wonder how different that is than Laura Mulvey&#039;s description of the way film spectatorship elicits a male gaze that women are asked/forced to inhabit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To clarify, a student showed this ad as part of a presentation on Tila Tequila and the media representation of bisexuality. I found this ad appalling for the reasons that everyone mentions. Fifa puts it well: we&#8217;re rewarding idealism and world knowledge with porn?!?</p>
<p>Focusing on the bisexuality, I found it oddly skewed. Tila Tequila *touches* the men but only allows the women to *gaze*. So, yes, there is a shift in that Tila is the focus of the male *and* female gaze, but I wonder how different that is than Laura Mulvey&#8217;s description of the way film spectatorship elicits a male gaze that women are asked/forced to inhabit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Darin</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4042</link>
		<dc:creator>Darin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 08:46:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4042</guid>
		<description>This is such a strange ad. Trying to use sex appeal to raise awareness of rape. 

And when the 2 girls talk together about thousands of people getting killed they are smiliing because she is going to strip.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is such a strange ad. Trying to use sex appeal to raise awareness of rape. </p>
<p>And when the 2 girls talk together about thousands of people getting killed they are smiliing because she is going to strip.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fifa</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4027</link>
		<dc:creator>Fifa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4027</guid>
		<description>It seems to me that the girls *are* drooling over her as well in the video (- a striking change from the usual &#039;girl-sees-hotter-girl-and-so-must-automatically-want-to-make-her-life-miserable Hollywood formula&#039;, but revolting either way.) Now we&#039;re rewarding intellectualism/idealism with porn? Overthrow Mugabe and the pornstars will love you? My brain is bleeding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems to me that the girls *are* drooling over her as well in the video (- a striking change from the usual &#8216;girl-sees-hotter-girl-and-so-must-automatically-want-to-make-her-life-miserable Hollywood formula&#8217;, but revolting either way.) Now we&#8217;re rewarding intellectualism/idealism with porn? Overthrow Mugabe and the pornstars will love you? My brain is bleeding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barbar</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/11/04/i-guess-human-rights-abuses-are-no-match-for-cleavage/comment-page-1/#comment-4026</link>
		<dc:creator>Barbar</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2008 07:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3949#comment-4026</guid>
		<description>Laughably ineffective of course.

A bit of a tangent, but this comment:

&quot;I guess hypersexualizing a woman is all fine and good, but bisexuality would be a real turn off.&quot;

seems way off base to me.  Her bisexuality fits in perfectly well with the hypersexualizing.  Trust me, this video would not be any &quot;better&quot; if the girls were drooling over her as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Laughably ineffective of course.</p>
<p>A bit of a tangent, but this comment:</p>
<p>&#8220;I guess hypersexualizing a woman is all fine and good, but bisexuality would be a real turn off.&#8221;</p>
<p>seems way off base to me.  Her bisexuality fits in perfectly well with the hypersexualizing.  Trust me, this video would not be any &#8220;better&#8221; if the girls were drooling over her as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

