<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Blackberry Storm Ad: Hey, Guess What? You&#8217;re a White Male!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Apr 2015 03:38:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3902</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Anonymous]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 22:06:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3902</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Isn&#039;t it entirely possible (in fact, likely) that rather than being a default person, this white bourgeois man specifically represents the commercial&#039;s target audience?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it entirely possible (in fact, likely) that rather than being a default person, this white bourgeois man specifically represents the commercial&#8217;s target audience?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3901</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 20:43:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m divided on this posting.  The original analysis does seem valid; a quick search on YouTube doesn&#039;t offer any comparable ads shot from a female or non-white perspective.

But the Vodafone ad introducing the Storm has a refreshing, if obvious, &#039;Benetton&#039; mix of sex/race:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stzqLqBUECc

I guess for me the point is that the &lt;I&gt;default&lt;/I&gt; perspective is from just another white male POV (full disclosure; I&#039;m just another white male).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m divided on this posting.  The original analysis does seem valid; a quick search on YouTube doesn&#8217;t offer any comparable ads shot from a female or non-white perspective.</p>
<p>But the Vodafone ad introducing the Storm has a refreshing, if obvious, &#8216;Benetton&#8217; mix of sex/race:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stzqLqBUECc" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=stzqLqBUECc</a></p>
<p>I guess for me the point is that the <i>default</i> perspective is from just another white male POV (full disclosure; I&#8217;m just another white male).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: William</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3899</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[William]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 19:45:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3899</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[@Daniel
I agree.  In my opinion, Assuming that the character is heterosexual says more about the author of the commentary than the ad&#039;s creators.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Daniel<br />
I agree.  In my opinion, Assuming that the character is heterosexual says more about the author of the commentary than the ad&#8217;s creators.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 18:35:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t see where the ad is heteronormative at all. How does this ad do any assuming of the person being hetero?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t see where the ad is heteronormative at all. How does this ad do any assuming of the person being hetero?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3893</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Steve]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 17:28:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3893</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yeah, your analysis here goes too far. They&#039;re targeting it to the exact guy who&#039;s speaking. That&#039;s assuming a lot, sure, but it&#039;s not unfair.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, your analysis here goes too far. They&#8217;re targeting it to the exact guy who&#8217;s speaking. That&#8217;s assuming a lot, sure, but it&#8217;s not unfair.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jane</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3888</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jane]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:54:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3888</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But the voice is Jim from The Office (or at least it sounds like him), so it&#039;s okay with me!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But the voice is Jim from The Office (or at least it sounds like him), so it&#8217;s okay with me!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fernando</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/10/29/blackberry-storm-ad-hey-guess-what-youre-a-white-male/comment-page-1/#comment-3885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fernando]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Oct 2008 15:00:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=3821#comment-3885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[So they can&#039;t do ads from the point of view of a human being with recognizable traits that place him as a white male? The ad doesn&#039;t have any kind of discrimination against non-white non-males. Unless, of course, the simply act of portraying one is such a thing.

Also, products are aimed at a certain public. They must try to relate to that public when selling something. As you&#039;ve showed in an other post the other day, money is unequally distributed in america, and white people are richer. A blackberry is not cheap. Do the math.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So they can&#8217;t do ads from the point of view of a human being with recognizable traits that place him as a white male? The ad doesn&#8217;t have any kind of discrimination against non-white non-males. Unless, of course, the simply act of portraying one is such a thing.</p>
<p>Also, products are aimed at a certain public. They must try to relate to that public when selling something. As you&#8217;ve showed in an other post the other day, money is unequally distributed in america, and white people are richer. A blackberry is not cheap. Do the math.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
