<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Representing Heroines in the Sarah Connor Chronicles</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/</link>
	<description>Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 01:42:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: On being female and resisting the feminist label.. &#171; Prioritizing the Paranoias</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-2333</link>
		<dc:creator>On being female and resisting the feminist label.. &#171; Prioritizing the Paranoias</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 14:31:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-2333</guid>
		<description>[...] as Sociological Images illustrates so well on a daily basis (they are quickly becoming my new favorite blog), we as a society are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] as Sociological Images illustrates so well on a daily basis (they are quickly becoming my new favorite blog), we as a society are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breck</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-2027</link>
		<dc:creator>Breck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Jul 2008 15:00:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-2027</guid>
		<description>They also gave him emo hair, which is unforgivable.

/rimshot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>They also gave him emo hair, which is unforgivable.</p>
<p>/rimshot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sociological Images &#187; WHAT WE&#8217;VE BEEN UP TO BEHIND YOUR BACK (JUNE 2008)</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-1821</link>
		<dc:creator>Sociological Images &#187; WHAT WE&#8217;VE BEEN UP TO BEHIND YOUR BACK (JUNE 2008)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 10:22:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-1821</guid>
		<description>[...] For contrast, I added the posters from the Terminator Trilogy to our post on how female heroines were represented in posters for The Sarah Connor Chronicles. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] For contrast, I added the posters from the Terminator Trilogy to our post on how female heroines were represented in posters for The Sarah Connor Chronicles. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; elsewhere on the internets, 2008-06-05</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-1586</link>
		<dc:creator>Smite Me! [.net] &#187; Blog Archive &#187; elsewhere on the internets, 2008-06-05</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Jun 2008 18:45:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-1586</guid>
		<description>[...] REPRESENTING HEROINES IN THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES @ Sociological Images [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] REPRESENTING HEROINES IN THE SARAH CONNOR CHRONICLES @ Sociological Images [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Breck</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-1560</link>
		<dc:creator>Breck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Jun 2008 13:40:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-1560</guid>
		<description>We have seen male action heroes in this kind of passive pose before, though.  The poster of Vin Diesel for &lt;i&gt;xXx&lt;/i&gt; comes immediately to mind, but a quick search returns the following  male movie heroes in passive, downcast-gaze poster poses for 2008:  Mark Wahlberg in &lt;i&gt;The Happening&lt;/i&gt;, Ed Norton in &lt;i&gt;The Incredible Hulk&lt;/i&gt;, Matthew Fox in &lt;i&gt;Speed Racer&lt;/i&gt;,  and Sylvester Stallone in &lt;i&gt;Rambo&lt;/i&gt;. 

There are others, surely.  I have no idea what the proportionality of female action heroes in these poses is compared to male action heroes, but I don&#039;t necessarily see it a exclusive to a single gender.  It should be noted, however, that some of the examples I gave are one pose of several, where this set seems to show the stars posed this way exclusively.

I actually don&#039;t see this pose as &#039;passive&#039;, either.  To me it recalls the pose of Michelangelo&#039;s David.  While previous David sculptures showed him either in triumph or in battle, Michelangelo depicted the moment of contemplation before the defining event, which heightened the drama.  This approach was so successful, one barely has to say &quot;Michelangelo&#039;s&quot; when talking about this David, though no less an artist than Donatello has a pretty great David of his own.

SPOILER BELOW for a 22-year old movie, though:  C&#039;mon, people!

The half-torn-apart image is pretty disturbing.  We&#039;ve seen a masculine version of that, too, however (only in the movie, not on posters though).   In &lt;i&gt;Aliens&lt;/i&gt;, the male android character Bishop is torn in two and drags himself around by his arms for a while.  It wouldn&#039;t have made sense as a poster, because the character was new to the series, wouldn&#039;t have meant anything to fans of the original film, and would have been a spoiler, to boot.  

So anyway, those two images on the left are a little weird because of the dehumanization, but that ambiguity is the point of the character (caveat:  I have not seen the TV series, but have seen all the films.  No, I&#039;m not proud.).  The down-and-away gaze does not strike me as particularly sexist or passive given the popularity of this pose in contemporary action movie posters.

Great find, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We have seen male action heroes in this kind of passive pose before, though.  The poster of Vin Diesel for <i>xXx</i> comes immediately to mind, but a quick search returns the following  male movie heroes in passive, downcast-gaze poster poses for 2008:  Mark Wahlberg in <i>The Happening</i>, Ed Norton in <i>The Incredible Hulk</i>, Matthew Fox in <i>Speed Racer</i>,  and Sylvester Stallone in <i>Rambo</i>. </p>
<p>There are others, surely.  I have no idea what the proportionality of female action heroes in these poses is compared to male action heroes, but I don&#8217;t necessarily see it a exclusive to a single gender.  It should be noted, however, that some of the examples I gave are one pose of several, where this set seems to show the stars posed this way exclusively.</p>
<p>I actually don&#8217;t see this pose as &#8216;passive&#8217;, either.  To me it recalls the pose of Michelangelo&#8217;s David.  While previous David sculptures showed him either in triumph or in battle, Michelangelo depicted the moment of contemplation before the defining event, which heightened the drama.  This approach was so successful, one barely has to say &#8220;Michelangelo&#8217;s&#8221; when talking about this David, though no less an artist than Donatello has a pretty great David of his own.</p>
<p>SPOILER BELOW for a 22-year old movie, though:  C&#8217;mon, people!</p>
<p>The half-torn-apart image is pretty disturbing.  We&#8217;ve seen a masculine version of that, too, however (only in the movie, not on posters though).   In <i>Aliens</i>, the male android character Bishop is torn in two and drags himself around by his arms for a while.  It wouldn&#8217;t have made sense as a poster, because the character was new to the series, wouldn&#8217;t have meant anything to fans of the original film, and would have been a spoiler, to boot.  </p>
<p>So anyway, those two images on the left are a little weird because of the dehumanization, but that ambiguity is the point of the character (caveat:  I have not seen the TV series, but have seen all the films.  No, I&#8217;m not proud.).  The down-and-away gaze does not strike me as particularly sexist or passive given the popularity of this pose in contemporary action movie posters.</p>
<p>Great find, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: el forastero</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-1539</link>
		<dc:creator>el forastero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 13:43:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-1539</guid>
		<description>I think there are more in this pictures that you can see at plain said. There are beutiful pictures. The third one, was the winner of a fan of the show in a contest to make posters.

I think this is a good example of cyborg, and the separation between the body and the machine. And where is exactly that limit. Schwarzenegger was man or machine (theres one picture where you can see both parts still theres not an simple organic union with the machine), and is in a woman where that union comes almost naturally. I don´t think we are talking about disembodiment of the character, but may be quite the opposite. Powerful women with mechanic, and more powerful parts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think there are more in this pictures that you can see at plain said. There are beutiful pictures. The third one, was the winner of a fan of the show in a contest to make posters.</p>
<p>I think this is a good example of cyborg, and the separation between the body and the machine. And where is exactly that limit. Schwarzenegger was man or machine (theres one picture where you can see both parts still theres not an simple organic union with the machine), and is in a woman where that union comes almost naturally. I don´t think we are talking about disembodiment of the character, but may be quite the opposite. Powerful women with mechanic, and more powerful parts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dismembered Summer Glau in Sarah Connor Chronicles posters at Hoyden About Town</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/06/03/representing-heroines-in-the-sarah-connor-chronicles/comment-page-1/#comment-1538</link>
		<dc:creator>Dismembered Summer Glau in Sarah Connor Chronicles posters at Hoyden About Town</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 12:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/?p=1285#comment-1538</guid>
		<description>[...] And it was her words that came to mind when I saw this Fox poster advertising Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles on Sociological Images: [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] And it was her words that came to mind when I saw this Fox poster advertising Terminator: The Sarah Connor Chronicles on Sociological Images: [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

