Comments on: Racial Categories As Historical Artifact http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/ Sociological Images encourages people to exercise and develop their sociological imaginations with discussions of compelling visuals that span the breadth of sociological inquiry. Fri, 10 Apr 2015 14:32:02 +0000 hourly 1 By: Caitlin http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-195270 Wed, 20 Jan 2010 05:14:32 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-195270 Notice, too, how only men are included in this. Women aren’t people and therefore cannot represent even a stereotype of their race.

]]> By: Cultural Relativism, Challenging the Universality of Human Rights « P.A.P. Blog – Human Rights Etc. http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-143125 Tue, 17 Nov 2009 07:24:08 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-143125 […] (source) […]

]]> By: Sociological Images » WHITES, BLACKS, & APES IN THE GREAT CHAIN OF BEING http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-1784 Wed, 18 Jun 2008 08:25:58 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-1784 […] The practice of depicting the races hierarchically occurred as late as the early 1900s as we showed in a previous post. […]

]]> By: pkdk http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-453 Sat, 29 Mar 2008 20:05:00 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-453 Interesting to me that they recognized more than one “type” of African and Native American.

Also, of course, the default person of any racial group is male.

]]> By: Casey http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-452 Tue, 12 Feb 2008 00:28:00 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-452 Did anyone else notice that the Naitve Americans didn’t get a “race type”?
Or that the last perosn is an “American Negro”

]]> By: Anonymous http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-451 Sat, 02 Feb 2008 11:14:00 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-451 Notice how the good respectable white old anglo saxan is at the top in the middle? I have a feeling I know which “race type” made the picture…

]]> By: Anonymous http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-450 Thu, 31 Jan 2008 02:00:00 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-450 There is a more elaborate version of this at a local pub, and it has always fascinated me

]]> By: Wendy http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/comment-page-1/#comment-449 Thu, 31 Jan 2008 00:00:00 +0000 http://thesocietypages.org/socimages/2008/01/30/racial-categories-as-historical-artifact/#comment-449 Wow! how incredibly creepy– especially the way the “race types” are arranged in a hierarchy.

]]>