<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The US Federal Budget</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2010/05/19/the-us-federal-budget/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2010/05/19/the-us-federal-budget/</link>
	<description>Analyzing the visual presentation of social data. Each post, Laura Nor&#233;n takes a chart, table, interactive graphic or other display of sociologically relevant data and evaluates the success of the graphic.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 31 Jan 2015 21:29:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: May Spotlight on Member Blogs &#171; Research!America</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2010/05/19/the-us-federal-budget/comment-page-1/#comment-5548</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[May Spotlight on Member Blogs &#171; Research!America]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 20:16:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/?p=801#comment-5548</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] knew that a discussion of onions in Germany could be so fascinating? And the Graphic Sociology blog jumps in to dissect a graphic that shows the relative place of research amid the U.S. federal [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] knew that a discussion of onions in Germany could be so fascinating? And the Graphic Sociology blog jumps in to dissect a graphic that shows the relative place of research amid the U.S. federal [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeToo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2010/05/19/the-us-federal-budget/comment-page-1/#comment-5493</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MeToo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/?p=801#comment-5493</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[oops - that 1005 was supposed to be 100%.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>oops &#8211; that 1005 was supposed to be 100%.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MeToo</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/2010/05/19/the-us-federal-budget/comment-page-1/#comment-5492</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[MeToo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 May 2010 16:12:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/graphicsociology/?p=801#comment-5492</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cool. One question: am I missing something? The budget is a totality: 1; 1005; one line. So, why are there two lines? Couldn&#039;t the blue line on the left be deleted, with no loss of info, and losing some confusion? I spent a few moments trying to figure out what the blue line was: the deficit? Next year&#039;s budget? EU budget?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool. One question: am I missing something? The budget is a totality: 1; 1005; one line. So, why are there two lines? Couldn&#8217;t the blue line on the left be deleted, with no loss of info, and losing some confusion? I spent a few moments trying to figure out what the blue line was: the deficit? Next year&#8217;s budget? EU budget?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
