<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Working Mamas, Working Families, and &#8220;Exceptional&#8221; Dads</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/girlwpen/2009/02/04/working-mamas-working-families-and-exceptional-dads/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/girlwpen/2009/02/04/working-mamas-working-families-and-exceptional-dads/</link>
	<description>Girl w/ Pen, founded by Deborah Siegel, publicly and passionately dispels modern myths concerning gender, encouraging other feminist scholars, writers, and thinkers to do the same.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:32:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaley Hassey</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/girlwpen/2009/02/04/working-mamas-working-families-and-exceptional-dads/#comment-767</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Kaley Hassey]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jun 2011 05:08:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlwpen.com/?p=1497#comment-767</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is very interesting, You&#039;re a very skilled blogger. I&#039;ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is very interesting, You&#8217;re a very skilled blogger. I&#8217;ve joined your feed and look forward to seeking more of your excellent post. Also, I have shared your website in my social networks!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Raeburn</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/girlwpen/2009/02/04/working-mamas-working-families-and-exceptional-dads/#comment-766</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Paul Raeburn]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 21:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://girlwpen.com/?p=1497#comment-766</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As a &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.fathersandfamilies.blogspot.com&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;father blogger&lt;/a&gt;, I&#039;d like to comment on the biological distinction between mothers and fathers that Elrena and Caroline took as the reason for focusing only on mothers.

I&#039;d suggest that the biological difference is not the important piece of this. Many women can work through most of their pregnancy, and they can choose not to breastfeed. (Yes, they might be foolish to do so, but it&#039;s a decision, not an absolute constraint. ) So the &quot;brunt of the biology,&quot; as Elrena puts it, might amount to as little as, say, missing work for the last month of pregnancy and two weeks after the birth. (Sadly, I think many women are forced to take no more time off than that.)

My point is not to argue that the situation for working mothers and fathers is the same--it clearly is not. But what makes them different is not the biology, but exactly the kinds of social constructs that lead to the situation Lydia describes, or to the different reactions at work when it&#039;s a mother or a father who takes time off to take the kid to the doctor. 

And, incidentally, this is anecdote, not research, but when my kids were sick for an extending period, and I left often to go to the hospital or the doctor, I suffered severely at work, even though I completed all my assignments and did my job. It&#039;s not quite so black and white. Bosses don&#039;t like family complications in fathers, either.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As a <a href="http://www.fathersandfamilies.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">father blogger</a>, I&#8217;d like to comment on the biological distinction between mothers and fathers that Elrena and Caroline took as the reason for focusing only on mothers.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d suggest that the biological difference is not the important piece of this. Many women can work through most of their pregnancy, and they can choose not to breastfeed. (Yes, they might be foolish to do so, but it&#8217;s a decision, not an absolute constraint. ) So the &#8220;brunt of the biology,&#8221; as Elrena puts it, might amount to as little as, say, missing work for the last month of pregnancy and two weeks after the birth. (Sadly, I think many women are forced to take no more time off than that.)</p>
<p>My point is not to argue that the situation for working mothers and fathers is the same&#8211;it clearly is not. But what makes them different is not the biology, but exactly the kinds of social constructs that lead to the situation Lydia describes, or to the different reactions at work when it&#8217;s a mother or a father who takes time off to take the kid to the doctor. </p>
<p>And, incidentally, this is anecdote, not research, but when my kids were sick for an extending period, and I left often to go to the hospital or the doctor, I suffered severely at work, even though I completed all my assignments and did my job. It&#8217;s not quite so black and white. Bosses don&#8217;t like family complications in fathers, either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
