<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Grandchildren of the Great Depression</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2010/01/31/grandchildren-of-the-great-depression/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2010/01/31/grandchildren-of-the-great-depression/</link>
	<description>Brooke Harrington explores the social underpinnings of money and markets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael E. Marotta</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2010/01/31/grandchildren-of-the-great-depression/comment-page-1/#comment-677</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Michael E. Marotta]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:23:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/?p=130#comment-677</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I am a little older, 60 now, and my parents were the youngest of five and seven. The Great Depression was a little closer for me.  Although I grew up in the Go-Go Years of the 50s and 60s, the hippie counter-culture was all about conservation of resources, hence Earth Day in 1971.  I just bought a nice tweed sport coat for school for $7 at the Goodwill.  

It was not so much that the Great Depression was an economic shock, but that the Roaring Twenties had been an uncontrolled Boom.  The years 1873-1894 or 1903 are now tagged &quot;The Long Depression.&quot;  Prices, including farm produce and factory wages, were falling. But those were also &quot;boom&quot; years of new inventions, new discoveries.  

Basically, capitalism encourages thrift.  The wild consumption of the 1920s was the result of many factors including &quot;progressivism.&quot; Dr. H cites &quot;Brave New World&quot; (Ending is better than mending.)  That book has characters Benito Hoover and Polly Trotsky.  The US 10-cent dime of 1916 has a fasces on the reverse.  Pareto and Marconi both supported Mussolini.  Individualism and capitalism -- and thrift -- were thought to be dead.  The brave new world of Ford was one of constant production ...  and consumption.  

Mere production is not CREATION, just as zillions of inflationary dollars are not WEALTH.  

For some of the many causes of the Great Depression, Murray Rothbard&#039;s classic goes into excruciating detail on the policies of the Federal Reserve Board that encourged lending (and production) over savings and creation.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am a little older, 60 now, and my parents were the youngest of five and seven. The Great Depression was a little closer for me.  Although I grew up in the Go-Go Years of the 50s and 60s, the hippie counter-culture was all about conservation of resources, hence Earth Day in 1971.  I just bought a nice tweed sport coat for school for $7 at the Goodwill.  </p>
<p>It was not so much that the Great Depression was an economic shock, but that the Roaring Twenties had been an uncontrolled Boom.  The years 1873-1894 or 1903 are now tagged &#8220;The Long Depression.&#8221;  Prices, including farm produce and factory wages, were falling. But those were also &#8220;boom&#8221; years of new inventions, new discoveries.  </p>
<p>Basically, capitalism encourages thrift.  The wild consumption of the 1920s was the result of many factors including &#8220;progressivism.&#8221; Dr. H cites &#8220;Brave New World&#8221; (Ending is better than mending.)  That book has characters Benito Hoover and Polly Trotsky.  The US 10-cent dime of 1916 has a fasces on the reverse.  Pareto and Marconi both supported Mussolini.  Individualism and capitalism &#8212; and thrift &#8212; were thought to be dead.  The brave new world of Ford was one of constant production &#8230;  and consumption.  </p>
<p>Mere production is not CREATION, just as zillions of inflationary dollars are not WEALTH.  </p>
<p>For some of the many causes of the Great Depression, Murray Rothbard&#8217;s classic goes into excruciating detail on the policies of the Federal Reserve Board that encourged lending (and production) over savings and creation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A Few More Thoughts on Culture, Consumption and Frugality &#187; Economic Sociology</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2010/01/31/grandchildren-of-the-great-depression/comment-page-1/#comment-669</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[A Few More Thoughts on Culture, Consumption and Frugality &#187; Economic Sociology]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:33:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/?p=130#comment-669</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] after writing the post below about the ways the recent economic crisis may have shifted cultural attitudes toward ..., I picked up Daniel Bell&#8217;s classic Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism and found this: [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] after writing the post below about the ways the recent economic crisis may have shifted cultural attitudes toward &#8230;, I picked up Daniel Bell&#8217;s classic Cultural Contradictions of Capitalism and found this: [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
