<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:creativeCommons="http://backend.userland.com/creativeCommonsRssModule"
xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" 

	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Monsters of the Complex Market</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2008/10/30/monsters-of-the-complex-market/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2008/10/30/monsters-of-the-complex-market/</link>
	<description>Brooke Harrington explores the social underpinnings of money and markets.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 15:11:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	
	<item>
		<title>By: Brian Pitt</title>
		<link>http://thesocietypages.org/economicsociology/2008/10/30/monsters-of-the-complex-market/comment-page-1/#comment-10</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Brian Pitt]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Nov 2008 19:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://economicsociologist.wordpress.com/?p=6#comment-10</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great Post!

Unfortunately, however, sociologists are just as likely to employ statistical models akin to economists and physicists when attempting to understand the financial crisis.  Moreover, being &quot;almost entirely data-driven&quot; will lead sociologists to conclusions that are more question-begging than elucidating.

That said, I agree with your overall argument that a new approach is needed in order to understand the financial crisis (and this new approach should not employ systems theories).  Hopefully, however, that new approach emphasizes thin theories - e.g., the tools of rational choice and network analysis - and thick descriptions (e.g., intensive interviews with mortgarge brokers and homeowners; a detailed exploration of the public opinion of minority homeownership in the late nineties through the present; and an historical look at the creation, operation, and promises of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great Post!</p>
<p>Unfortunately, however, sociologists are just as likely to employ statistical models akin to economists and physicists when attempting to understand the financial crisis.  Moreover, being &#8220;almost entirely data-driven&#8221; will lead sociologists to conclusions that are more question-begging than elucidating.</p>
<p>That said, I agree with your overall argument that a new approach is needed in order to understand the financial crisis (and this new approach should not employ systems theories).  Hopefully, however, that new approach emphasizes thin theories &#8211; e.g., the tools of rational choice and network analysis &#8211; and thick descriptions (e.g., intensive interviews with mortgarge brokers and homeowners; a detailed exploration of the public opinion of minority homeownership in the late nineties through the present; and an historical look at the creation, operation, and promises of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
