public health

Colorado Arts and Science Magazine wrote an article about Leslie Irvine (Professor of Sociology at the University of Colorado at Boulder) and Cameron Whitley’s (Assistant Professor in the Department of Sociology at Western Washington University) research on the loss of companion animals in the Marshall Fire that was overlooked by public officials and the news media. They found that “the wildfire…killed more than 1,000 companion animals who were trapped in homes”, however, two months after the fire only 16% of news stories published mentioned animals. Whitley and Irvine shed light on how these companion animals “…don’t fit into breaking news. But they shape everyday life for years…for people with animals, the disaster often continues for the rest of those animals’ lives—through toxic exposure, long‑term illness and ongoing [unrecognized] grief.”

Leslie Irvine & Cameron Whitley

The Conversation recently published an article by Emily Huddart (Associate Head and Professor of Sociology at University of British Columbia) and Tony Silva (Associate Professor of Sociology at University of British Columbia) on how political orientation impacts opinions on climate policy.  Examining the range of climate opinions on the political right, they found that affective polarization drove the variation: “Negative feelings toward the left and positive feelings toward the right were by far the strongest predictors of climate policy attitudes.” Huddart and Silva explain that “If opposition to climate policy is rooted in social and political identity, then strategies for building support need to reflect that reality…this will mean finding core needs that Canadians have in common and seeking policies that can have climate benefits while meeting those core needs.”

Emily Huddart & Tony Silva

The book Trash! A Garbageman’s Story by Simon Pare-Poupart made it onto a New York Times book list called The Nonfiction Everyone Will Be Talking About in 2026. Pare-Poupant’s book investigates society’s relationship with garbage, drawing from his graduate study in sociology. It is “A Montreal garbageman’s sharp and funny memoir/exposé, in which he attempts to convince people to ‘stop imagining that your garbage magically disappears…’”

Simon Pare-Poupart

An article from Newswise by the American Sociological Association (ASA) announces the expansion of Context, “the quarterly magazine that makes cutting-edge sociology research accessible to general readers,” to an online-only fully digital publication. Editor David Grazian (Professor of Sociology at the University of Pennsylvania) explains that “With the move online, Contexts enters a new chapter—one that broadens our reach and deepens our ability to engage a public hungry for evidence-based perspectives on the most pressing social issues of our time.”

American Sociological Association (ASA)

Zeynep Tufekci (Professor of Sociology and Public Affairs at Princeton) wrote an opinion piece for the New York Times on the Trump administration’s slashing of research funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Tufecki highlights that NIH “grants are a crucial reason that America has the most advanced biomedical research infrastructure” and that this decision endangers Americans’ health. “It was nice having the world’s most important, most vital medical research infrastructure,” Tufecki writes. “But enough. To the wood chipper!”

Zeynep Tufekci

Elizabeth Bruch (Associate Professor of Sociology at the University of Michigan) and Amie Gordon (Assistant Professor of Psychology at the University of Michigan) have teamed up to design Revel, a dating app for students at the University of Michigan that doubles as a research tool. While modern dating apps collect a “treasure trove” of relevant data, this data is often inaccessible for researchers or users. Using Revel, Bruch and Gordon aim to examine how people “find opportunities, pick strategies, and learn from mistakes” and why couples choose to stay together or break up. This story was covered by The Pulse.

Elizabeth Bruch and Amie Gordon

The Hong Kong Free Press ran a story on Ruby Lai’s (Assistant Professor of Sociology at Lingnan University) research on Hong Kong’s subdivided flats–living units of approximately 119 sqft. that house over 200,000 people in Hong Kong. “There is an assumption that only the poor live in subdivided flats, but housing precarity and unaffordable housing are problems faced by most people,” Lai said, emphasizing the diversity of residents. Lai also examines how individuals and families transform these constrained spaces into “resilient, functional and liveable abodes.”

Ruby Lai

The New York Times ran a story on how companies are navigating legal risks in response to the Trump administration’s attacks on D.E.I. efforts. Companies simultaneously want to avoid discrimination lawsuits, “Trump’s ire, federal investigations and lawsuits from anti-D.E.I. conservatives.” Musa Al-Gharbi’s (Assistant Professor in the School of Communication and Journalism at Stony Brook University) commented: “D.E.I. programming grew popular because it was responding to real challenges organizations were facing. Basically they’re being told to do nothing about these problems.”

Musa Al-Gharbi

Remembering Michael Burawoy: Last week, renowned British scholar Michael Burawoy passed away at age 77 after he was struck by a hit-and-run driver. Sociologists and others continue to reflect on his legacy in Berkeley Sociology, Verso Books, The Wire, and The Daily Californian.

Michael Burawoy

• Julia Sonnevend (Associate Professor of Sociology and Communications at the New School for Social Research) was interviewed by Public Seminar about her new book Charm: How Magnetic Personalities Shape Global Politics. Sonnevend discussed how political charm is evaluated by (often fragmented) audiences and how the charm of a political leader affects views of their country: “We simply pay more attention to personalities than to institutions, values, or even facts. If you think about the international context, we are often talking about countries Americans know very little about. And when there is a relatable political character, or a character who we really dislike, it is easier to put the country in a box.”

• Eric Klinenberg (Professor of Social Science at New York University) wrote an opinion piece in the New York Times arguing that there is an “urgent need to make dangerous heat more recognizable.” Klinenberg discusses how, despite the fact that deaths due to heat waves typically outnumber deaths from hurricanes, tornadoes, and floods combined, Americans are “quick to forget” heat waves. Klinenberg argues that major heat waves should be named (like major storms are named, e.g. “Hurricane Katrina” or “Superstorm Sandy”) to help us “recognize it as an enemy and mobilize support for public projects” to avoid future climate disasters.

• Pesquisa ran an article on homelessness in Brazil, which has grown about 211% from 2012 to 2022. Research from the Institute of Applied Economic Research (IPEA) indicates that the primary reasons for homelessness are financial hardship, broken family ties, and health issues (particularly related to addiction). Marco Antônio Carvalho Natalino (Sociologist at the Institute of Applied Economic Research) explains that “the reason for homelessness influences its duration,” and homelessness due to family or health issues tends to last longer. Fraya Frehse (Professor of Sociology at the University of São Paulo) commented that the spread of homelessness is a global reality.

• Ahead of the U.S. presidential debate, Tressie McMillan Cottom (Associate Professor at the University of North Carolina’s School of Information and Library Science) joined four other New York Times columnists in an online discussion on the candidates and their potential pathways to winning the election. McMillan Cottom noted that “Trump is a known entity. He does not have to “win” the debate…he has to win the media cycle. His biggest risk is being ineffectual at commanding attention.” For Harris, the “best path to winning is through historic turnout and enthusiasm.” McMillan Cottom emphasized the importance of selling a compelling story to scared, angry voters: “The big story of Trump’s win in 2016 was that voters were angry and experts missed it. … The story in this election is that voters are still angry and we may still be missing it. I spent time talking to female voters in nail salons, hair salons and waxing salons. … The women I talked to in those female spaces are angry and afraid. As one low-information voter told me, she wants someone to look like a fighter.”

• David Karen (Professor of Sociology at Bryn Mawr) is featured in the recently released film Love 2020. The film is about the 2020 US Open–the first major international event held during the COVID-19 pandemic. Karen commented that it “was a delight to talk with Jacqueline Joseph, the director of the film, about so many things that I’m passionate about: tennis, New York City, the role of sports in our lives, and movements for social justice.” This story was covered by Bryn Mawr News. 

And Some Bonus Clippings:

• Arlie Russell Hochschild’s new book, Stolen Pride: Loss, Shame, and the Rise of the Right, was covered by WBUR and the Boston Globe.
• Sherry Turkle’s interview for Body Electric discussing the effects of AI chatbots on relationships was re-publicized on NPR last week.

This year was momentous for trans visibility in the media, with high profile celebs like Laverne Cox and Caitlyn Jenner speaking out about their experiences as trans women. Even so, trans folks still face an incredible risk of discrimination and attacks. The recent death of Keisha Jenkins marks at least 20 American trans women murdered in 2015.

But trans people are not equally likely to experience discrimination. A recent study published by Lisa R. Miller and Eric Anthony Grollman showed that trans women were more likely to experience discrimination than trans men, as are trans folks from already disadvantaged groups—like those who are multiracial or low income. In turn, those who experienced more discrimination were more likely to engage in risky health behaviors like smoking cigarettes, abusing drugs and alcohol, and attempting suicide. Miller told US News, “Rather than assuming that all members of the transgender community are equally at risk, we need to investigate the extent to which some members may face disproportionate exposure to discrimination and poor health.”Those who experienced more discrimination were more likely to engage in risky health behaviors like smoking cigarettes, abusing drugs and alcohol, and attempting suicide.

“Wow, it’s only $2.20 a gallon over here!”

“Remember when it was $3.20 a few months ago?”

From the late 2000s until recently, gas prices were consistently on the rise. A more recent downward slide may have some consequences: though cheap gas prices might be lighter on the wallet, individuals might be at greater risk for car accidents.

In an article from MN-based Star Tribune, Tim Harlow discusses research conducted by Guangqing Chi of the South Dakota State University’s Department of Sociology and Rural Studies. A professor and demographer whose specialties include the sociology of transportation, Chi had studied data on gas prices and overall traffic safety in Minnesota from 1998 to 2007. His team found that “a 20-cent drop in gas prices resulted in 15 more fatalities a year. Conversely, he found that a 20-cent increase would bring a decrease of 15 deaths annually.”

Using similar methodology with study data from Alabama and Mississippi, Chi has found that teens are more impacted by high gas prices, driving less frequently when prices go up. Their road reticence when costs are high, Chi’s study asserts, may lead to safer streets. Beyond driving less often, Chi says, when gas prices rise, “we suspect people drive more carefully.” For now, go ahead and put the pedal to the metal—just, you know, don’t throw all caution to the wind.

California’s measles outbreak  has refueled heated debates about mandated childhood vaccinations. With little known about the political leanings of anti-vaxxers, many politicians are carefully toeing the line to avoid alienating potential voters. In a recent Star Tribune article, though, sociologist Kent Schwirian said:

There is a long history to the fight against vaccination, and it does seem to break down along liberal versus conservative lines.

Schwirian argues that political conservatives are more likely to be anti-vaxxers than their liberal peers. The Ohio State University professor bases his claim on his own 2009 study of the swine flu scare, in which he found that conservatives who distrusted government were more likely to oppose vaccinations than were others with higher levels of trust or more progressive politics.

For more, see “There’s Research on That!“