Newark Mayor Cory Booker recently announced that he will spend the week of December 4th living on food stamps. He will join the ranks of many others, such as celebrities and college students, who are undertaking a food stamp challenge. As Professor Noliwe M. Rooks explained in an opinion piece in Time, however, there is a problem with such challenges.
These experiments are designed to make politicians and the general public more sensitive to the difficulties of living on $4.00 per day, the amount that the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) provides to the almost 46 million people who currently receive benefits…Proving that those who are wealthy, middle class or famous can live on $4.00 per day may increase empathy, but it will do little to actually help those who need the program most.
In the meantime, there is little public conversation about actually raising the dollar amount that the SNAP provides. To explain this, Rooks cites survey research conducted by the Pew Research Center. In the poll, 59% of respondents said the government should provide food and housing to all citizens. Yet, 71% thought the poor were too dependent on this type of assistance, and 52% said support should not be increased if it will increase the deficit. Americans are, in general, deeply ambivalent about the role of government assistance.
But, Rooks argues that this assistance is much needed. One in five people surveyed in a recent Gallop poll said they could not always afford to feed their entire family, and more Americans struggled to afford food in 2011 than in any other year since the financial crisis. Between 1996 and 2011, SNAP reduced the number of extremely poor children in the United States by 50%. To Rooks, an increase in the amount of support offered by the SNAP program would have an even larger impact.
Those who have taken up the SNAP challenge and chronicled their experiences all say that they were tired, couldn’t focus, and were distracted by hunger. Once their week was over, their lives got right back to normal. We can only hope that Cory Booker and others who take up such experiments will become advocates to help raise others out of poverty and not just spend a week walking in their shoes.
Comments 4
Friday Roundup: November 30, 2012 » The Editors' Desk — November 30, 2012
[...] Food Stamp Challenge on Citings and Sightings [...]
Joseph Crane — December 6, 2012
Wow, that's...impressive. I wonder if he'll end up cheating at all.
Letta Page — December 6, 2012
I saw that he's doing little videos about the experience. In the one I saw, he talked about how his first observation was that his work meant that he was away from his food for most of the day and couldn't buy any more, so he went most of the day without eating until he got home. He needed to plan better on how to keep food with him and eat it during the day because he wasn't letting himself take anything his staff offered or that might be on hand at the meetings, since it wasn't "budgeted." Second, he had to give up caffeine cold turkey. There wasn't enough money for coffee or soda once he spent his money on food (he was, in the video, eating a giant, fresh salad, so he must have decided to spend higher amounts to get fresh foods and more food, rather than just going for high-calorie stuff).
One thing that struck me was that Booker himself appears to be a fairly big man - he's likely to have higher caloric needs in a day (esp. if he's running around saving Newark as seems to be his wont) than, say, I would. I'm sure SNAP and other programs don't take that sort of thing into account, so you'd end up encouraged (if not required) to get less healthy, but more calorie-dense foods.
air force 1 — December 6, 2012
I am extremely impressed with your writing
skills and also with the layout on your blog. Is this a paid theme or did you customize it yourself?
Anyway keep up the nice quality writing, it is
rare to see a nice blog like this one nowadays.